User:AYen3013/Eugene "Eda" Wade/Rkitam Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:AYen3013


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AYen3013/Eugene "Eda" Wade
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Concise and coherent— it covers the content that are being written in the article and does not cover additional information. Extra sentence for the lead about his notability might be better by presenting what he achieved overall, maybe referring to some of the notable works?

Content

The content is well covered, having enough information to be a notable page in wikipedia.

Tone and Balance

Tone feels very neutral for the 'Early Years' and 'Career' section, the 'Notable Work' might be starting to sound a little biased towards him? Maybe you could quote them if it came from a specific person.

Sources and References

The sources look promising, some might be a little biased in promoting his work as part of their project, but I think you took out the information and presented neutrally.

Organization

Very nicely organized, maybe the last section could be 'Legacy' since it talks more about what happens after his death.

Images and Media

No photos available. If no fair use photos could be found for the person, one way is to add an external links section so that people can click on the link and get redirected to a photo archive on another website.