User:Aaaker/National Art Library/SunRey451 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Aaaker


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Aaaker/National Art Library


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * National Art Library

Evaluate the drafted changes
I'm sure you're still planning to add more and rework the article so there really isn't much to comment on yet. However, I will continue to look out for some changes!

Lead
I don't think the lead needs a ton of reworking. Some of the sentences could use a little rephrasing for clarity, but I like that you changed the second sentence. This was a good change! It adds context to why the library is a "last resort."

The lead has been updated really well. It is much more relevant to the topic with citations from outside sources.

Content
Will you be keeping "Highlights of the collections?" That section may have some interesting sources related to it! The reformatting of this section has definitely added to the page. Also, I think it's really important that you added the "History" section to this page. The content you have found to support this section is very interesting and relevant.

Tone and Balance
With what has been added/changed, the tone and balance is very neutral!

Sources and References
You have really changed the citations! There's many more outside secondary sources than the original page.

Organization
Good sections added to the page.

Images and media
The image you added to the page is interesting. It adds to the content that you've written about.