User:AadityaGupta19/Chopine/Eddiwong Peer Review

Lead: The existing lead for the article is short, concise and straight to the point which is good. However, I think you could move a little of the information in the second paragraph to the lead (especially the part about how they were worn in Venice, as it does not say in the lead where chopines were worn).

Content: The content in the existing article and your draft is very informative and clear. I like the points you are adding to the article in your draft, they complete the article.

Tone and balance: The tones of the article and your draft are neutral, unbiased, and factual. No changes needed.

Sources and references: Make sure to include citations/footnotes to your sources/references when you add your edits into the article. In your draft, it looks like you haven't included those yet. Make sure to make clear what information you've taken from your sources.

Organization: I think organizing the article into smaller subsections or headings would make it more organized and easier to digest. (for example, adding a history section for more historical facts, or an etymology section for the last paragraph, etc.)

Images and media: It would be nice if the article included more images of chopines or perhaps more primary source media and images (maybe images or paintings or drawings of people wearing chopines during that time).

Overall impressions: The existing article is very strong already, but your edits will help it reach its full potential. Make sure to add sub-sections/headings for organization and don't forget to cite your sources with citations/footnotes.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)