User:Aalve1/sandbox

This is my Sandbox, where I can write down notes of articles that I have corrected.

Article Evaluation:




 * I realized that in "Genre" it says that the book is short story and adventure. I agree with the short story; however, despite the setting of the story being in the woods, it is not one of adventure. It simply tells the story of a man with a dog taking a hike in the woods that goes wrong.
 * The article is neutral.
 * The citations work and come from valuable sources.
 * I feel that the 1908 version of "To Build a Fire" is overrepresented since there is more information on it compared to the 1902 version, but it makes sense since the 1908 version is more popular and heard of.
 * The information seems up-to-date and caught up with.
 * It seems to be more different than the way we discussed because we covered a lot of viewpoints of "To Build a Fire" compared to how Wikipedia does.
 * There are no quotations in the Wikipedia version of "To Build a Fire".
 * The structure of the article altogether is good and not confusing at all.