User:AaronAspelund/Badminton in the United States/Eddie943586 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) AaronAspelund / Badminton in the United States
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AaronAspelund/Badminton in the United States

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, The lead has been updating to the peer review.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the introductory sentence is introducing the badminton in USA.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, The lead gives a major idea that the badminton in USA
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The information are pops-up to the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think it's ok

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content added all of the elements of the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? It's not seems like that.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The important figure part needs to improve that.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The viewpoints are are presented by the author really well.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Yes

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?The source are cited and reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, when i checked the first source , it's shows the reliable link
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? The links are working

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The content adds well-written source
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Little bit
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content was organized and listing well.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, gives me more understanding for the topic
 * Are images well-captioned?Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?it's listing sources excellent
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? The article gives me a clear sense for the badminton in US
 * What are the strengths of the content added?The strengths is the current badminton in US needs to get more attention
 * How can the content added be improved?