User:Aaron Schulz/RfB

A good candidate must:


 * Intrinsic requirements
 * Understand consensus
 * Believe that Bureaucrates principly "measure" consensus
 * AGF (reasonably) and be willing to listen and put thought into things
 * Be well trusted
 * Must know when to IAR; not be overly bureacratic or focused on simple stats
 * Plan to use the tools significantly, not just get the title and sit there
 * Be in touch with what being an editor/admin means


 * Indicators of some of the above
 * Have been decently active in RfA at least in the 30 days or so
 * Exceptions obviously for users with illnesses. Also, a user that was at least very active a few months ago at RfA could pass if it was clear that they were going to become and stay active.
 * Have experience as an administrator
 * Continue to edit somewhat, as that keeps them in touch with our goals