User:AaryanKhan001


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. I have also reverted the move of Aryan Khan. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Aryan khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only claim to fame is being the child of a movie star; however, this is not enough to warrant an independent article (just ask Brooklyn Beckham). The article talks a lot about Aryan Khan being "destined" to be a star, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so he should not have his own article until he actually is a star. Also, even if the article were to be kept, it is horrendously promotional in tone, to the point where I think it'd be hard to salvage it into a decent article without just doing a rewrite. Iago Qnsi (talk) 18:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  18:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect to Shah Rukh Khan. Per WP:FUTURE. Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  19:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Redirect is inappropriate - should every child of every article worthy subject have a redirect.Peter Rehse (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator of this article also, I think, inappropriately moved the original subject Aryan Khan to an incorrect (by wikipedia standards) name.  If this article gets deleted the original; should be moved back even though it too is of questionable notability.  If it doesn't get deleted the renaming gets more complicated.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looks like a fan page.-  Managerarc   ™ talk  20:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.