User:Aarzoomaknojia/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Women in science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is related to science and the topic of women in science resonates with me. I also find this topic very interesting.

Evaluate the article

 * This article starts with a strong lead that introduces the topic of Women in science throughout history. The lead also mentions why someone would find this article informative and how it can play a resourceful role.
 * The content of the article is relevant and informative. It provides details on various time periods and the roles women in science have played in each. Although, the statistics section is relevant it is outdated as the information discussed is from 2013.
 * This article is neutral and states all facts with lots of references. The article is not persuasive and introduces and explains the topic in a factual manner.
 * All of the sources used are credible and working links. Resources that are used to cite present day facts in the article are up to date and make sense with the presented info.
 * The article is well written with easy to understand writing. The article is well organized in chronological order.
 * Images are included in the article of women in science. Images in the statistics section are representative of the trends being discussed and are enhancing to the understanding being presented.
 * In the talk pages, the common conversations being made are making reference to certain key women that are missing in the article. There is mention of the article being used in course assignments through Wiki Education Foundation.
 * The article does a really good job at highlighting key areas of history that women had made an impact in science with. While the article does leave out some people, it does a good job at addressing major contributors. The article is fairly complete and well-developed.