User:Aasal.pdx/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Anthiinae

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article to evaluate because I thought it was very interesting that this fish was a hermaphrodite. I am also a biology student who is looking into marine science, so I wanted to get an idea of some of the details of the study

Evaluate the article
This article was very informative. I really appreciated the classification and the history that was included. I think that one of the things I would have also appreciated was a little more detail on the biology of the fish, especially in the context of it being a hermaphrodite. I would have liked to see a little more separation between the sections and a little more detail within each.

The sources are pretty current, however, I would have liked to have seen more. Adding more sources would help you lengthen the article a lot more through more detail. I would add more about the environment that it thrives in (geographic location, water temp, deep water, shallow, etc.) Adding these aspects will also give the reader more information about what it enjoys and why it enjoys it.

I would also go into detail regarding communication, lifespan, migration, threats, any cultural depictions, special features, and diet. All of these things are really important to be expanded on. I would also go into more detail about size, you could include a figure of it being compared to a regular everyday object, or you could provide measurements. I would also include its conservation status and a map of where it is located. For all of these sections, I would recommend adding pictures.

Another thing that would help with this article is by adding a couple more pictures, especially, in the context of them traveling in schools. Adding pictures will help keep the reader engaged and also help with visualization.

Overall, this article hit a lot of good points, I just think that they need to be expanded a little more and go a little more in depth. The overall strengths in this article is that its well organized into different paragraphs and that each paragraph is consistent with one topic, however, I would create more segregation in that sense and allow for different sections. Different sections will help the reader jump to one part of the paper without having to dig through the information. I would also like to see more sources to help develop this article a little more. Overall, I would say that this article is slightly underdeveloped.

Thank you!