User:Aasaro4970/Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965/Sjmiatech Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Aasaro4970)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Aasaro4970/Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your article is very detailed and I can see how tough it would be to add additional material. I did like how you added interest groups to show different factions in the committee meetings on those who supported and against the bill. I think you are on the right track your edits look very professional in presentation and have a good flow. I also liked the addition you put in Johnsons works to promote the legislative piece to get this law on the books. The thing I was curious about was there seem to be a section that discussed keeping provisions of the previous bill formula from the 1920's such as the anti homosexual provision. Was anything majorly discussed such as committees or any advocates for it and what other provisions were retained from the previous law? Overall I am confident in the edits you want to propose.

Response to Peer Review
Thank you for looking at my draft! One of my following focuses on my Wikipedia page will be the background information section to make sure everything is correct. In the section, I will elaborate on anything that can currently confuse the audience and ensure that everything is accurate. Within the background section, I will specifically look into the part where the act had a homophobic ruling and adequately cite it to eliminate the confusion.

--Alexis A.