User:Ab7155/Bribery/Htetnaingoo9 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)Ab7155


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ab7155/Bribery?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bribery

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)Lead - I see that you added a new section, ‘Bribery in different countries, to this original article. I think it could be useful to understand this ‘Bribery topic” for the audience. I did not clearly see your topic sentence in your new section.

Content -I think that your new adding content is relevant to the topic. And I did not see any irrelevant content in your contribution. In your contribution, you mentioned how the relationship between trade and Bribery. I would like to suggest that you should add a historical case that is relevant to this relationship and then discuss more it. I like the solution part, and I think that it is reasonable for this problem.

Tone -I think your contribution to this article is neutral, and I did not see any bias. However, there could be room for arguments supporting or opposing this solution part.

Sources - All new sources and information are reliable for this topic.

Organization -I think that your contribution is easy to read for the audience. I did not see any serious grammatical or spelling errors in your contribution. But I see some kind of punctuation and minor grammatical errors. I think that your contribution is well-organized.

Overall Impression -

Your contribution to this topic is really good, but there is still room to argue in your new section, especially the trade and solution part.

Great job!