User:Abagelbagel/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cold and heat adaptations in humans

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article was in a field I was interested in, "Environmental Studies" and it itself was something I wanted to learn.

Evaluate the article
The starting sentence feels blunt and uninteresting, however the rest of the paragraph feels informative, drawing in curiosity. The content of the article fits the title and expectations, plus more. Personally, when stating "adaptations" my mind only thinks physiological, so I think it's neat that they added cultural adaptations.

The tone feels informative, thus formal and neutral. The stronger pieces of information referencing studies and specific cultures had sources to back them up. There were no photos and I feel the physiological section could be stronger with some images.

The "Talk" section of this page has individual posts, but no replies or anything to build off other's questions and comments. It feels lacking, which makes me think this article is well written, or hardly seen.

The article does well to be a general source of information of its topic while giving topics to branch off from if someone wanted to do their own research. It is short and simple, which should be the goal, though it does lack pictures to help people imagine the adaptations described. I can see this being a problem to someone who is new to these sort of topics.

Overall though, I do feel like the article is complete enough and does it job to the standard viewer that need information to get started with.