User:Abains1721/Homelessness among LGBT youth in the United States/Isabelleosorio Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Abains1721
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Abains1721/Homelessness_among_LGBT_youth_in_the_United_States/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There might be some details that can be cut down for brevity (e.g. "first implemented ... and reauthorized).
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. The only part that seems a bit iffy to me is the phrasing near the end, "there needs." (Personally I think it's neutral because there is a need but the phrase might not be neutral on "Wikipedia standards". Maybe adding the identity of the [person/report] that claims this statement will make it sound more neutral.)
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Seems like it.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I think that the content can be split into more than one paragraph because it is pretty dense.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The new content provides more context into the gaps in federal response.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think some details can be cut down, and the section can be organized into separate paragraphs.