User:Abatra21/Beta oxidation/Difei Shi Peer Review

General info
Abatra21, Sylee00
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Abatra21/Beta oxidation
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Beta oxidation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Content:The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. The content belongs to the article.

Tone: The content added is neutral and not biased.

Sources: The content accurately reflect the reliable source of information. The sources are current, but it can be improved with a more diverse spectrum of authors. The fourth link under "Reference" cannot be found by the link provided.

Organization: The content added is well-written and well-organized with no grammatical or spelling errors.

Image: The article includes an image to explain steps in beta-oxidation. The image is well-captioned and adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.

Overall: The content added improved the overall quality of the article. The content can be improved with more references and more organization.