User:Abbeyperrin/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) 5 Seconds of Summer, Paul's Case
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I have a lot of information about this band so I am able to make comments and evaluate the information on this topic.
 * It is a short stor we read in class.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise
 * Concise

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * No

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * To me yes, but it says on the page that the neutrality of the article is currently being disputed.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No
 * The article makes it seem that Paul's relationship with his father is in fact abuse, when it was never confirmed.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Some are current but most are older.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes
 * Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Mostly, but the writing is almost too concise and short.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * No
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * No, the picture with each of their photos has no source.
 * N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes
 * N/A

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are no conversations, just nominations for things to be deleted.
 * There are a lot of discussions, specifically about adding new sections and or deleting some.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It's rated C-class and low importance. It is a part of WikiProject Biography/Musicians, Australia/Music, and Pop and Rock Music.
 * It's rated at start-class and some low importance. It's a part of the Short Story WikiProject as well as LGBT studies and Women writers.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Wikipedia agrees with most of the theories we've discussed, but seems to believe that Paul's relationship with his father is abusive.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Overall the article is solid, not too lengthy but not too vague.
 * Overall the article has a few structural errors but has a good base to start with.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article has a lot of information about the band's start.
 * The article has a solid plot summary and symbolism section.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * It could have more detail about the band's new album release.
 * The article can restructure their sections as well as make more sections.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * This article is well developed and complete, but could use a few more details.
 * This article is underdeveloped but once more information is added it could turn into a complete article.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: