User:Abbsolutely04/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.


 * Article title Talk:California Green Chemistry Initiative
 * Article Evaluation.
 * The talk page of this article includes some suggestions for improvement including making it less vague and asking for more up to date research. The content of the article is pretty relevant to the topic of the article. This was written neutrally and the claims have citations. The content could e more up to date with  how the initiative has been changed and implemented throughout the last few year as many of the information is about 2009.
 * Sources
 * https://dtsc.ca.gov/green-chemistry/
 * https://healthyplacesindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2008_california_green_chemistry.pdf
 * Sources
 * https://dtsc.ca.gov/green-chemistry/
 * https://healthyplacesindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2008_california_green_chemistry.pdf

Option 2

 * Article title. Natural oil polyols
 * Article Evaluation
 * The last edit to the talk page of this article was in 2018. The edit was adding a source to the page and instructions on how to link certain sources. This article is very relevant to the topic and even includes many examples of natural oil polyols, their structure and uses. The article is written neutrally but does contain some abbreviations that are not specified and may confuse someone who is not familiar with them. The sources listed are reliable.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ijc.2910400209

Option 3

 * Article title Toyota–United
 * Article Evaluation. There is only one reference listed for this article. There Is no talk page for this article. The article is very forward and neutral but very short and lacks in depth information. The source for this article is also a website you have to pay for and I could not access it. This is a stub article.
 * Sources
 * https://www.uci.org/road/teams//TeamDetail/944/1001097/27
 * http://www.tourdegeorgia.com/toyota-united-pro-cycling-team.html
 * https://www.uci.org/road/teams//TeamDetail/944/1001097/27
 * http://www.tourdegeorgia.com/toyota-united-pro-cycling-team.html

Option 4

 * Article title.  Precursor (chemistry)
 * Precursor (chemistry)
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is very brief and to the point with the definitions on this article. The writing is neutral. The article does include some specific types of precursors but does not give very in depth definitions of what they mean. The sources are up to date on this article. The talk page is empty. This is a stub article calling for better quality.
 * Sources
 * https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr900406f
 * https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Precursor+(chemistry)
 * https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr900406f
 * https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Precursor+(chemistry)

Option 5

 * Article title. Spiralia
 * Spiralia
 * Article Evaluation This is a stub article calling for better quality. The sources are used well throughout the article to define more scientific jargon. The references are up to date. The article was written neutrally in great depth. The definition could be expanded upon a little bit in this article. The talk page includes a source fix for the article.
 * Sources
 * https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/31/7/1833/2925860
 * https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-7091-1871-9
 * https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/31/7/1833/2925860
 * https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-7091-1871-9