User:Abby.christi/sandbox

Welcome to your sandbox!

This is place to practice clicking the "edit" button and practice adding references (via the citation button). Please see Help:My_sandbox or contact User_talk:JenOttawa with any questions.

Link: Project Homepage and Resources


 * Note: Please use your sandbox to submit assignment # 3 and to present your article improvements before uploading them to your article talk page.


 * Talk Page Template: CARL Medical Editing Initiative/Fall 2019/Talk Page Template

== DELIRIUM ==

Wikipedia Assignment 2 - Due November 6th 2019
Grover, S., & Avasthi, A. (2018). Clinical Practice G

Guidelines for Management of Delirium in Elderly. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, (60)Suppl 3: S329-S340. 10.4103/0019-5545.224473

Retrieved from https://www.ebmedicine.net/topics/psychiatric-behavioral/delirium-agitation.

How did I search for the source?

I conducted a preliminary search through Pubmed for “Delirium” AND “Differential Diagnosis”:

“(Delirium[Title]) AND Differential Diagnosis[Title] Schema: all Filters: Review; published in the last 5 years”. I then focused the search to include “delirium” OR “acute confusional state” as MeSH Major Topics: “(((delirium[Title]) AND delirium[MeSH Major Topic]) OR acute confusional state[MeSH Major Topic]) AND differential diagnosis Filters: Review; published in the last 5 years”. Although this search introduced me to some review articles on delirium, none of them, as far as I could understand, listed or addressed possible differential diagnosis for delirium that matched or resembled the list available on the Wikipedia page. I continued with the following:“((delirium[Title/Abstract]) AND differential diagnosis) AND clinical practice guidelines” and found two sources. One was appropriate (Wong, 2015) and can be used to support the above listed source.

I then performed a brief Google Scholar search for “delirium differential diagnosis guidelines”, and narrowed the search by “since 2018”. This search provided a number of guidelines, reviews and texts (3,250), two were appropriate (Sugalski, 2019), one is listed above (Grover, 2018).

I continued with the following search through the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:


 * 1) delirium.m_titl. (16)
 * 2) guidelines.mp. [mp=title,     short title, abstract, full text, keywords, caption text] (5201)
 * 3) diagnosis.mp. [mp=title,     short title, abstract, full text, keywords, caption text] (5518)
 * 4) 2 or 3 (7492)
 * 5) 1 and 4 (12)

This search yielded 12 results. Although they were extremely reliable sources, I did not find any to include sufficient differential diagnoses.

Which sources were considered?

Pubmed:

Flaherty, J. H., Yue, J., & Rudolph, J. L. (2017). Dissecting Delirium: Phenotypes, Consequences, Screening, Diagnosis, Prevention, Treatment, and Program Implementation. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 33(3), 393-413. 10.1016/j.cger.2017.03.004

Han, J. H., & Suyama, J. (2018). Delirium and Dementia. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 34(3), 327-354. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2018.05.001

Pubmed (2nd search):

Wong, N., & Abraham, G. (2015). Managing Delirium in the Emergency Department: Tools for Targeting Underlying Etiology. ''Emergency Medicine Practice. 17(''10): 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.ebmedicine.net/topics/psychiatric-behavioral/delirium-agitation

Google Scholar:

Grover, S., & Avasthi, A. (2018). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Delirium in Elderly. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, (60)Suppl 3: S329-S340. 10.4103/0019-5545.224473

Sugalski, G., Ullo, M., REVIEWER, P., & Winograd, S. M. (2019). Making sense of delirium in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Reports, 40(3) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2175238208?accountid=6180

EBM Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:

Burry, Lisa, Hutton, Brian, Williamson, David R, Mehta, Sangeeta, Adhikari, KJ Neill, Cheng, Wei, et al. (2019). Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9). Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=coch&NEWS=N&AN=00075320-100000000-10154

Miranda, Fabian, Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, Diaz, Gonzalo, Gonzalez, Francisco, Plana, Maria N, Zamora, Javier, et al. (2018). Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9). Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=coch&NEWS=N&AN=00075320-100000000-11526

Why was the source chosen?

The first source (Grover, 2018) was chosen because it included a number of differential diagnoses for delirium, particularly echoing those that were already listed on the Wikipedia page.

The second (Sugalski, 2019) and third sources (Wong, 2015) were chosen to strengthen the first source’s claims as to the possible differential diagnoses for delirium. For the purposes of this assignment, only the first source (Grover, 2018) will be examined.

List at least three reasons why the source that was selected meets Wikipedia’s reliable medical sources (MEDRS) criteria?

-       According to MEDRS criteria, Wikipedia sources should be based on secondary or tertiary sources that are reliable and independent. My source cited a number of books, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and Randomized Controlled Trials, among others. This emphasizes that the information in my source has been previously appraised and filtered.

-       Wikipedia sources should also be as up-to-date and current as possible. As my source was first published in 2018, it is within the 3-5 year margin for selecting prominent sources for a Wikipedia article.

-       In order to be as reliable as possible, Wikipedia’s medical sources should be independent, third-party sources. Often, if the source is a supplement to an academic journal, it might lack independent oversight or peer review. This is the case for my first source (Grover, 2018), as the letter “S” has been added to page numbers, and “Suppl.” was included before the issue number. Even though this is a supplement, it does not necessarily mean that it is a sponsored supplement, but we cannot be sure that it is a legitimate source. Because of this, I included two more sources (Sugalski, 2019 and Wong, 2015) that were clearly not supplements, and that, together, covered all the differential diagnoses included in my first source (dementia, depression and other mental illnesses), except psychosis (see below for further elaboration).

C'''OMMENT- did the supplement describe the financial support used to produce it. If not then it might alleviate concern (or could increase it depending on the journal!)'''

-       Wikipedia’s medical sources should not emphasize in-vitro or animal studies. My source does not do so.

How do I plan to use the source for improving the article?

In the Wikipedia page on Delirium, under ''5. Diagnosis; 5.3 Differential diagnosis'', the following statement introduces the differential diagnoses for delirium:

“Other processes and syndromes that cause cognitive dysfunction resembling delirium include the following.”

With my sources, I am to provide an adequate citation for the above statement. The Wikipedia article then goes on to list and outline the various differential diagnoses that they have for delirium, namely: Psychosis, Dementia, Depression, Other Mental Illnesses and Long Term Learning Disorders.

I plan to use my first source to provide a citation for the above statement. It will be amended as follows (see below), and the section titled: Long term learning disorders or congenital brain dysfunction will be removed. Until an appropriate source can be found stating psychosis as a differential diagnosis for delirium, the heading titled Psychosis should also be removed, or placed in a new section. Currently, all differential diagnoses are clearly marked with [citation needed] except for Depression, which should also remain the case until suitable citations are found for each. In order to strengthen my first source, I will include the two other sources mentioned previously (Sugalski, 2019 and Wong, 2015). My proposed change to the section introduction is:

“There are conditions that might have similar clinical presentations to those seen in delirium. These include psychosis, dementia, depression and other psychiatric disorders.”

Wikipedia Assignment 3 - Due November 18th 2019
Proposed Changes


 * 1) Change the sentence introducing the “Delirium” section, add in relevant sources.
 * 2) *Original: “Other processes and syndromes that cause cognitive dysfunction resembling delirium include the following:[ citation needed]”
 * 3) *Proposed: “There are conditions that might have similar clinical presentations to those seen in delirium. These include dementia, depression, psychosis, and other conditions that affect cognitive function.[1][2][3][4]”

COMMENT- I prefer your wording, but was confused a bit about whether psychosis or depression had citations to support their inclusion

[1]: Grover, S., & Avasthi, A. (2018). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Delirium in Elderly. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, (60)Suppl 3: S329-S340. 10.4103/0019-5545.224473. Retrieved from https://www.ebmedicine.net/topics/psychiatric-behavioral/delirium-agitation

[2]: Wong, N., & Abraham, G. (2015). Managing Delirium in the Emergency Department: Tools for Targeting Underlying Etiology. ''Emergency Medicine Practice. 17(''10): 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.ebmedicine.net/topics/psychiatric-behavioral/delirium-agitation

[3]: Sugalski, G., Ullo, M., REVIEWER, P., & Winograd, S. M. (2019). Making sense of delirium in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Reports, 40(3) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2175238208?accountid=6180

[4]: Oh, E.S., Fong, T.G., Hshieh, T.T., & Inouye, S.K.(2017).Delirium in Older persons: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal American Medical Association,  318 (12), 1161-1174. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28973626

2. Remove “Long term learning disorders” from the list of differential diagnose

3. Change the order of the listed differential diagnoses


 * Original: “Psychosis…,Dementia…, Depression…, Long term learning disorders…, Other mental illnesses…”
 * Proposed: “Dementia…, Depression…, Other mental illnesses…, Psychosis…”

Rationale for Proposed Change & Controversy or Varied Opinion


 * 1) The term “similar clinical presentations” instead of “cognitive dysfunction” was selected to unite the reasoning behind the differential diagnoses for delirium. This term was chosen to include the symptoms of these diagnoses that extend beyond just "cognitive dysfunction", the term used in the original sentence on Wikipedia. This can lead to controversy or varied opinions because although a number of the manifestations of delirium, dementia, psychosis and other mental illnesses can be traced back to similarities of cognitive dysfunction, it is not inclusive and does not cover all the factors that can contribute to the diagnosis of delirium, especially when considering the signs and symptoms. The term "clinical presentations" allows for such criteria, namely in the 4AT test: alertness (drowsiness, hyperactivity) and acute change or fluctuating course (in alertness, cognition or other mental function). This test is recommended in the 2019 SIGN Guidelines[5].

'''COMMENT-pay attention to the clarity of you wording. For example, I am not sure what "traced back to the similarities of cognitive dysfunction" means. I believe I know what you mean but it would be very unclear if we had not discussed this in the group.'''


 * 1) The removal of “Long term learning disorders…” is recommended because they do not feature on the list of potential differential diagnoses or common sequela of the four sources above[1][2][3][4], nor as a part of the 2019 SIGN Guidelines[5] specifically the four sequela used to support Proposed Change A: dementia, depression, psychosis, and other conditions that affect cognitive function. This can lead to controversy or varied opinions as some might be opposed to the removal of these disorders. As it is difficult to prove why a section should be removed in this way, other than emphasizing its absence from the relevant literature and/or guidelines, I will address any questions or concerns on the Delirium Talk page by members of the Wikipedia community as they arise.
 * 2) The order of listed differential diagnoses was modified to better reflect the differential diagnoses listed on the three sources above, as well as included in the 2019 SIGN Guidelines[5]. This included placing "psychosis" at the end of the list of differential diagnoses, as it was only included in the differential diagnoses of two sources[1][4], not clearly listed on the three other sources. As with Proposed Change #2, I will address any questions or concerns on the Delirium Talk page by members of the Wikipedia community as they arise.
 * 3) [5] Soiza, R. L., & Myint, P. K. (2019). The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 157: Guidelines on Risk Reduction and Management of Delirium. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 55(8), 491. doi:10.3390/medicina55080491

COMMENT- you add the SIGN guideline in your justification but should that not listed as a source?

Critique of Source

In Assignment #2, I briefly touched upon the limitations of my first source (Grover, 2018) :

In order to be as reliable as possible, Wikipedia’s medical sources should be independent, third-party sources. Often, if the source is a supplement to an academic journal, it might not have independent oversight or peer review. This is the case for my first source (Grover, 2018), as the letter “S” has been added to page numbers, and “Suppl.” was included before the issue number. Even though this is a supplement, it does not necessarily mean that it was sponsored by industry groups (or other interested groups), but we cannot be sure that it is a legitimate source.

Furthermore, there are no clear disclosures of conflicts of interest in my source. These two reasons (supplement, lack of disclosures) informed my decision to search for additional sources to support my changes.

Because of this, I included three more sources (Sugalski, 2019, Wong, 2015 and Oh, 2017) that were clearly not supplements, and that, together, covered all the differential diagnoses included in my first source (dementia, depression, other mental illnesses and psychosis).