User:Abbymetzger/Évreux Cathedral/JuneBug522 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Abbymetzger


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Abbymetzger/Évreux Cathedral


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Évreux Cathedral

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * Overall the lead is very concise. The added phrase is a good introduction while being brief and informative.

Content


 * As for content, I find that all the added information has improved the article. Nothing seems to be out of place or unnecessary, and it all seems relatively up to date. Overall, I believe readers will appreciate the added content.

Tone and Balance


 * Overall everything is approached from a neutral stance without any apparent bias visible. I didn't feel like there was anything pushing me to take one side or another either. However, the use of the word very can sometimes be seem as biased, so in the future I'd consider using it sparingly.

Sources and References


 * I believe all the sources that were added were reliable and up to date.

Organization


 * Overall the organization of the content was clear and understandable. There are a few sentences that seemed slightly repetitive so possibly distributing are rewording them to help the article flow better would be a possible word of advice.

Images and Media


 * N/A

Overall impressions


 * Overall, I found that the article was pleasant and informative. The addition of more citations has made it more reliable, and the new content adds significantly more substance to the article.

Good job!