User:Abbyroman/Social programs in the United States/Riyarajani Peer Review

General info
Abbyroman
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Abbyroman/Social programs in the United States
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Social programs in the United States

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - I'm not entirely sure where this draft segment is intended to be inserted, similar to the last article I peer-reviewed. I suggest revising the introductory sentence, as it jumps into the information without clearly stating the topic to be discussed.

Content

Is the added content relevant to the topic? - Yes, the topic is highly relevant as it addresses information about social programs in the United States and the issues they have caused. Is the added content up-to-date? - It's unclear how current the content is due to the absence of a bibliography and citations. Does the article address one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it discuss topics related to historically underrepresented populations? - Yes, it does. By focusing on social programs, it addresses underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance

Is the added content neutral in tone? - The tone remains neutral throughout, focusing on presenting information about new social programs that were implemented in 1996. Are there overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints? - I think the viewpoint is neutral with no bias.

Sources and References

I couldn't answer these questions as the sandbox lacks citations.

Organization

Is the added content well-written, concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes, it's easy to read. Reviewing it aloud could help identify any conflicts or errors. Does the added content contain any grammatical or spelling errors? - I think that you could work on cleaning up this sentence: "A study by the Urban Institute encapsulated this effect on the immigrants of the city of Los Angeles County. Applications that were approved by legal noncitizen families for Medi-Cal and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families dropped 71 percent between January 1996 and January 1998. And there was no decline among citizens." There are several grammar errors, and the information could be more precise.

Overall Impressions

Has the added content improved the overall quality of the article? - It's a little hard to tell right now, as I am not sure where the information is going to be added to. However, the information is very useful, and I think once I know where it is going to be added, the information will be good.

What are the strengths of the content added? The content's strength lies in its information, as it conveys new social programs that have been implemented and what happened to people after they were implemented.