User:Abd/2009 contributions/April

18:19	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Another fine source: mention the links at the bottom of the PRI article: newenergytimes.com and lenr-canr.org. 18:14	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Another fine source: excellent find, LSD. 17:55	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: diamonds may be forever, but not the authority of sources if the subject has advanced. Sources review what was available, and sometimes not even all that. 11:03	30-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: extended consideration of this. 01:50	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: extend 01:44	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: fmt 01:42	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: Park isn't needed for what is there. But, hey, suit yourself. 01:00	30-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Confirmation?: yes, the SPAWAR results confirm earlier findings. 20:31	29-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Relation to theory: comment on theory. 18:35	29-04-09		Rashad Khalifa	source is given. source has not been impeached. Source is Tucson citizen, not convenience copy shown. Want to be useful? Find the disposition of the case. 17:05	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Viridae instructed: extra words out! 17:04	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Viridae instructed: reject utterly. 16:59	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Viridae never meant his pledge: respond to disruptive wikilawyering over what would be *at worst* minor failure to recuse. 16:36	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Viridae deblacklisted newenergytimes: clarify fact 16:29	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG blacklisted newenergytimes: sign 16:28	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG blacklisted newenergytimes: correct misapprehension that appears common. 16:24	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold Fusion: Clerks, please reserve comment section for parties to comments by parties; respond to MastCell. 16:14	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: request clerk to close and collapse request as having failed for lack of a second. 04:57	29-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Neutron radiation: new section 04:53	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: clarify a little 04:38	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Neutron radiation: period 04:37	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Neutron radiation: "the main" was quoted from Storms, actually, but this is more neutral. Then connect with MB's report, clearly well above background) See Talk.	 04:34	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Neutron radiation: no implication was made re mainstream view, though I'm not sure who Main Stream is and if we can quote him. But try this.	 04:02	29-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: sigh. I tried.	 03:23	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Neutron radiation: The Mosier-Boss findings confirmed earlier work, some of which is cited in the Mosier-Boss paper, plus other sources.	 03:11	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: Add Hoffman (1995) 02:37	29-04-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 286627664 by Abd (talk)2009 was correct for print publication. 2008 was on-line pub. 00:12	29-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Verifying link addition statements: that was a radical misunderstanding. 23:53	28-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Revert over alleged copyvio: about the abstract. Seeing an abstract is greatly inferior to seeing a paper. 23:49	28-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Revert over alleged copyvio: I'm backing off from asserting the link, it may indeed be a problem. 21:43	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold Fusion: Unless Hersfold and MastCell would like to become parties to this arbitration, I think this belongs here. Please revert me if I'm wrong. 19:13	28-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Revert over alleged copyvio: thanks for clarifying. This is the same issue as was raised with lenr-canr.org. 17:42	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold Fusion: Unfortunately, the evidence shows a likelihood of recurrence, not with Cold fusion, but with some new involvement. 17:09	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: sign 17:08	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: This issue wasn't ripe for ArbComm, I suggest this case only establish some basic limits. 16:42	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: copy edt 16:39	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: fmt 14:53	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist to sanction behavior, not content: this has been discussed at great length. we have ideas about better process. 11:29	28-04-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: fix year. 11:26	28-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Revert over alleged copyvio: new section 11:16	28-04-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: put it here 11:15	28-04-09		User talk:Abd	Groundrules and accepted background: move comment 04:26	28-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Fresh block, during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: make it clear 04:18	28-04-09		Cold fusion	Lack of neutron radiation: arrgh. fix ref 04:17	28-04-09		Cold fusion	Lack of neutron radiation: who's been writing this article, anyway. Add proper reference to Mosier Boss. Accepted as plausible? By whom? Remove dubious Park reference, redundant triple-miracle comment. 03:59	28-04-09		Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: remove material not substantiated in source, or entire book used without page nos. 03:58	28-04-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: add convenience link for Mosier-Boss neutron finding paper. 03:36	28-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: OMG, I could be reverted? I suppose I won't bother editing, then. LeadSongDog, thanks for fixing the tag. 01:34	28-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: rant. Oh well, Talk page, maybe a friend will collapse and summarize,or I will. 21:20	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: WTF? I tried to agree, then I read it again. Dangerous. 20:37	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: respond to Enric. How to avoid undue weight: follow peer-reviewed reliable source. 20:19	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: edits must have crossed. 20:17	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: POV tag added. 19:48	27-04-09		Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: section misrepresents sources, violates WP:SYNTH 19:42	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: how do we determine due weight? Ask question again about "correlation." 19:22	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): don't know where "quite" came from. 19:20	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Protected page edited (Spam-lacklist): add comment about whether actions were "right" or not. Will add diffs. 19:08	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: new section 18:50	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: fix link 17:49	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Response to Hipocrite's evidence: new section 17:43	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Template: Requst to narrow focus. 17:25	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: will go ahead as a Request. 17:20	27-04-09		Talk:Majority criterion	Weaker than the Condorcet critereon?: fmt) (top) [rollback]	 17:19	27-04-09		Talk:Majority criterion	Weaker than the Condorcet critereon?: the problem is a certain ambiguity in definition, which, though obvious, I have no reliable source on. Just mailing list discussions with experts.	 16:57	27-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	A question: just to make it clear, AMIB's behavior, even if he made a mistake, was quite proper.	 14:49	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Verifying link addition statements: disentangle this, hopefully. 11:03	27-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ikip: answer question about what to do about spewed venom. Step aside and don't take it personally. 04:40	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: conversation with Miles et al. 04:09	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: fmt 04:08	27-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: what's in reliable secondary source? Glad you asked? Storms, 2007. 02:56	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: add editing of protected blacklist page 02:41	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: support J.'s proposal. 02:38	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold Fusion: not terribly relevant. 02:32	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd and dispute resolution: how could I possibly disagree with this? 02:24	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution: no doubt you have some valid points, Durova, none. 02:15	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: add link, tighten a little. 02:02	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: bold it so that it's not so easily missed, since J. thinks it important. 02:01	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Policy and point of view: oppose, perhaps I just don't see the purpose of saying this here. 01:50	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution: add 2.2, explain. 01:39	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution: comment on threats against me. They've been there, but I basically wasn't deterred. Someone else might have been. 01:27	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution: general acceptance of Jehochman's proposed principle. Maybe not the best wording yet, but 2.1 is close. 01:00	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: and furthermore.... 00:42	27-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case.: Thanks, Jehochman. Next? 00:32	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Blocks related to Cold fusion, CF editor: fix section heading 00:30	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: whittle, dealing with arbitrators who will actually look at diffs. 00:15	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Fresh block, during Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: specify 00:15	27-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: Blocks and Fresh block. 23:26	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: Deletion 23:15	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: one level less 23:15	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: use subsection 23:14	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools while involved: links that won't change. 23:09	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG used admin tools with respect to Cold fusion and editors involved.: page protection 22:54	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Proposed motion that could simplify all this: new section 22:46	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Possible motion to narrow focus of this case. 22:22	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Spam blacklist guideline: about that guideline and my approach. 22:13	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Verifying link addition statements: it can be done, but why? Even if those numbers are accurate (they might well be!), so what? 21:57	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): Gee, I thought so too! 21:43	26-04-09		Cold fusion	External links: add video note 21:42	26-04-09		Cold fusion	External links: add updated URL and date. 21:40	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New URL for CBS video on cold fusion.: new section 21:03	26-04-09		Infinite Energy (magazine)	Definitely, Infinite Energy has been willing to explore deep fringe or even beyond. So-termed? Where did that neologism come from? 20:54	26-04-09		Talk:Infinite Energy (magazine)	Merge Infinite Energy (magazine) to Eugene Mallove: cite recent reference to Infinite Energy.) (top) [rollback]	 20:37	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some more relevant info?: collapse extended discussion.	 20:29	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some more relevant info?: review CR-39 early history	 18:35	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard	Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: please, someone close this.	 18:25	26-04-09		Cold fusion	See also: great idea, Verbal. 18:21	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: ref the use of Gall 17:53	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: respond re EL, etc. 17:43	26-04-09		Cold fusion	External links: add highly notable newsletter covering the field. 17:42	26-04-09		Steven B. Krivit	set up redirect of notable editor name.) (top 17:39	26-04-09		New Energy Times	moved User:Abd/New Energy Times to New Energy Times: move draft to article space) (top 17:39	26-04-09		User:Abd/New Energy Times	moved User:Abd/New Energy Times to New Energy Times: move draft to article space 17:37	26-04-09		New Energy Times	External links: add ext link now that site no longer blacklisted. 17:29	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: cut to the chase 17:28	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: sign and add original timestamp. 17:25	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: per editor request. No problem. 17:22	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: comment tossing in a certain level of dissent within the CF community 16:29	26-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: add summary statement. 16:01	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): Suggest you review your evidence, Beetstra, and make sure it's really important for ArbComm review. 15:53	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard	Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: respond to Beetstra with appreciation for his efforts. 15:43	26-04-09		User talk:Abd	Comment at WP:AN: s with original timestamp 15:41	26-04-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar: ce 15:39	26-04-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar: thanks, Ikip 15:34	26-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ikip: about recusal and how to proceed to possibly avoid future conflict. 15:21	26-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ncmvocalist's questions: sign it 15:20	26-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ncmvocalist's questions: r to NCMV 15:16	26-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ikip: It's now moot, except that you could, if you choose, clean up a bit. 15:06	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Blocked Ikip for canvassing: not resolution of discussion and archive 14:56	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Blocked Ikip for canvassing: suggest unblock to AMIB as a fast-resolution move, laudable. 14:50	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Blocked Ikip for canvassing: r. to NCMV 14:43	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Blocked Ikip for canvassing: Thanks, AMIB 14:40	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: proposing external link to NET 14:30	26-04-09		Articles for deletion/Virginia Lewis (10th Kingdom)	Virginia Lewis (10th Kingdom): Merge without prejudice 14:20	26-04-09		User talk:A Man In Black	Ikip: please unblock or recuse 14:15	26-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Blocked Ikip for canvassing: unblock immediately, no cause for block has been shown, and there has been adequate discussion. 05:30	26-04-09		User talk:Viridae	Question: point out that acting admin (previous closer) was Beetstra, not JzG. 05:27	26-04-09		User talk:Viridae	Question: thanks again, Viridae. 05:10	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of New Energy Times from the blacklist: new section 04:55	26-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: so a report issued in 1999 is a critique of a DoE presentation in 2004? 04:44	26-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	providing summaries of Abd's comments: Coppertwig quite welcome to summarize. 04:19	26-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Durova's remark to me (Beetstra): comment 03:29	26-04-09		User talk:Abd/Sandbox	Here's a little link to keep: new section) (top) [rollback]	 17:22	25-04-09		User talk:Abd	Comment at WP:AN: Thanks for the kind thoughts. My considerations.	 15:41	25-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: okay, gotta be a URL!	 15:35	25-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG was involved with Cold fusion pushing an anti-fringe POV: replace current wikilinks with permalinks 14:47	25-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Evidence presented by Abd: expand first section. will collapse to diffs alone, later. 13:58	25-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard	Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Thanks, MastCell and Verbal. 13:00	25-04-09		User talk:Abd	http://newenergytimes.com delisted: of course I don't mind, that's how Wikipedia works. 03:46	25-04-09		User talk:Abd	http://newenergytimes.com delisted 03:42	25-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Continued discussion of delisting request: note regarding closure by Viridae 03:37	25-04-09		User talk:Viridae	Your close of the delisting request for newenergytimes.com: new section 03:29	25-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard	Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Thanks! 03:27	25-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Evidence presented by Abd: Just an outline for today. See the RfC and original RfAr statement. 03:13	25-04-09		Administrators' noticeboard	Admin assistance needed for delisting request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: new section 02:57	25-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: fmt 02:55	25-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: new section 01:42	25-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: discussion begin on Shanahan Talk. 00:55	25-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 285958266 by Abd (talk)small iPhone, big fingers. 00:22	25-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by Objectivist 20:10	24-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some more relevant info?: sp 20:09	24-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some more relevant info?: on groundreport.com and the toxic (to science) climate; how things have shifted over the last ten to fifteen years. 18:28	24-04-09		Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: separate what is sourced and what isn't. 15:46	24-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: respond to further statements, since this hasn't been closed or a case opened. 04:58	24-04-09		User talk:Abd	An aside: fmt 04:58	24-04-09		User talk:Abd	An aside: same arguments would apply. 04:49	24-04-09		Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: match what is in source. The comment about difficulty appears to be WP:SYNTH. 04:27	24-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	An Overlooked Book?: fix link, use nowiki because of blacklist. Hope you don't mind, V. 02:53	24-04-09		User talk:Abd	An aside: thanks. 02:27	24-04-09		User talk:Ss06470	A question for you: add more specific link.) (top) [rollback]	 02:22	24-04-09		User talk:Abd	delisting of newenergytimes.com: here's why delisting first for newenergytimes.com	 22:51	23-04-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 23	Support/Oppose flagged revisions: add note re non-usage and not canvassed.	 22:50	23-04-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 23	Support/Oppose flagged revisions: strong keep. 22:43	23-04-09		User talk:Alansohn	Warning: recommending DR was good advice. 22:41	23-04-09		User talk:Alansohn	Warning: dislike repression.... notifying members of a category may be legitimate. 22:21	23-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	Really good idea from Guy: about self-published works. 22:09	23-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD dispute: caution 22:05	23-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD dispute: no, I did not research your involvement. You could be right as rain or as wrong as possible, except that people who are that wrong don't usually ask for advice. 17:47	23-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	Really good idea from Guy: hmmm. not sure this is approriate here, but I'm not willing to take out the comment I'm responding to! 17:30	23-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD dispute: a bit more. 17:25	23-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD dispute: okay, some tips. 13:14	23-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: note of intention to request neutral review. 11:40	23-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	Really good idea from Guy: some good, as far as it goes. 23:57	22-04-09		User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	clean) (top) [rollback]	 21:58	22-04-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	draft review of RfAr response) (top) [rollback] 20:21	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: I interpret it differently. 18:59	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: you are right about thick skin, Durova. 18:24	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: try again. 18:05	22-04-09		User talk:Kirk shanahan	Begin to narrow discussion: new section 17:42	22-04-09		User talk:Spartaz	Your statement at RfAr about a discussion we had.: new section 17:01	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: Don't see the "challenge," there are some questions mixed in with noise. 16:13	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: On Rothwell and Shanahan and my approach to understanding the topic. 16:06	22-04-09		User talk:Abd	April 2009: sp 16:05	22-04-09		User talk:Abd	April 2009: Thanks, Jehochman, but I woujld like to know what edit Verbal is talking about. 13:00	22-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	A comment for public consumption: respond to SBHB 12:32	22-04-09		User talk:Abd	April 2009: color me impaired, please provide a diff. 05:51	22-04-09		User talk:Abd/Pre-arbitration/Whig	Clarification request: respond to very old question that was overlooked.) (top) [rollback]	 05:40	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	Your comments at the RfAr for Abd and JzG: I was referring to Mathsci, whose comment was predictable. How am I doing, Durova?	 05:30	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: sorry, Durova, I hope you don't mind the screed on your Talk page.	 04:53	22-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	A comment for public consumption: respond. 04:28	22-04-09		User talk:Jehochman	Meta admins and discussions: details. I hope this is useful. 03:55	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: respond to Shanahan, asking him to provide criticism, even if it is OR and can't be directly used in the article. 03:42	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: challenge Shanahan to pursue consensus. Probably off this page. Out back? Seriously, my talk or his or a user page would be better. 03:23	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: BTW, some really useful stuff the two of you have been writing. 03:20	22-04-09		User talk:Durova	For better accuracy: dropping into the middle of a nice discussion or is it a cat fight? forgive my clumsiness. 02:56	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: thanks, Jehochman, I think you missed a few things. 02:30	22-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: response re meta discussions. 01:53	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: oops, fix a possible error. 01:49	22-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: reply to Shanahan, a published expert in the field, by the way. 01:26	22-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: respond to Newyorkbrad 18:53	21-04-09		Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder	Dispute resolution: suggest RfC if dispute still exists. Please, all sides, seek consensus. 18:32	21-04-09		User talk:Durova	Your comments at the RfAr for Abd and JzG: new section 18:19	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	Please trim your statement on requests for arbitration: thanks, KnightLago. 18:14	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFAR: more comments about the RfAr 17:52	21-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	New paper out: comment on new paper and New Energy Times 17:21	21-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: how about biological transmutation? Fringe enough? I'm not making that edit today! 16:56	21-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of comments from this page: article content is stricter than Talk, not less restrictive. Mention RfAr and involvement of those who comment there. 16:37	21-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: emphasize, given contrary claims elsewhere. 16:19	21-04-09		User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing	copy edit) (top) [rollback]	 16:14	21-04-09		User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing	ital	 16:12	21-04-09		User:Abd/Majority POV-pushing	begin essay	 15:24	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFAR: Thanks again, Jehochman.	 15:01	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD: fmt	 15:01	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD: I'll look if I have time. 14:51	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	Page of Shibdas Ghosh, Linked to SUCI: be very careful about sockpuppet charges. 13:18	21-04-09		User talk:Mr.Z-man	Please undelete User talk:JedRothwell: new section 02:32	21-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: inspired by Durova's apostrophe demon. 02:25	21-04-09		User talk:Abd/Archive 9	add section to archive early 02:21	21-04-09		User talk:Abd	Strike 3?: remove section to archive manually. editor going ballistic, interpreting words losing AGF, communication breaks down. 02:05	21-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: edit per request by clerk. 01:25	21-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: The most important issue is recusal. If there was no recusal failure, *then* my behavior was outrageous. Complainants against me should be parties to an arbitration over my behavior. 19:33	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of comments from this page: no position asserted here that edits of banned editors can't be removed. Don't misrepresent the problem. 19:28	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: wrong one! 19:27	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fix nowiki link. 19:25	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: link to discussion of report. 19:20	20-04-09		User talk:Abd	Strike 3?: let's see where the discussion goes. 17:03	20-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: restate 16:22	20-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFAR: weird 16:16	20-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFAR: Fasten seat belts. Here we go. 16:11	20-04-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: add statement as involved party 15:58	20-04-09		User talk:Abd	Strike 3?: and what? I'm out? answer Beetstra's questions. 15:13	20-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: link was asserted as an example showing both sides. There is quite valuable information there, and also editorial comment and some selective presentation of fact. 15:05	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: sp 15:05	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: Actually, I asked Krivit. 14:55	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add diff of removal by Verbal. 14:51	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: well-established that editors may restore useful edits from banned editors. 14:14	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: haven't seen the actual report, I think. I'll ask those who should know. 14:04	20-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: stopped, whether right or wrong. Now, the topic here? 14:01	20-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: r to Bilby. 04:42	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: add a source from a nuclear physicist who gives much more commentary. 04:10	20-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: make link visible. 04:06	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add ref to Talk page. 04:05	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: separate Verbal's fantasy from my comment. 03:38	20-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: full program link 23:40	19-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: The link was redundant. 21:25	19-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: thanks, Fritzpoll, I'll ask the bot operator. 16:39	19-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: actually, wikitext isn't enough at all. 16:35	19-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: sorry, clarify one point and I presume we are done, thanks for considering this. 16:30	19-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: answer question raised, thanks for considering the matter, sorry to bother you. 16:09	19-04-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Sockpuppetry case: friendly warning to Radhakirshnansk. 15:59	19-04-09		User talk:Verbal	Abd again: are you sure you want to stand on an oxymoron? 15:49	19-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of comments from this page: why this instead of AN/I? 15:46	19-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of comments from this page: what violation of WP:TALK? 15:35	19-04-09		Cooper Brown	a bit clearer that this is a totally unverified assertion, probably part of the spoof.) (top) [rollback]	 13:46	19-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of comments from this page: new section	 13:17	19-04-09		User talk:Verbal	Abd again: please suggest mediator.	 13:06	19-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: okay: I'm not the moose and I'm not the train. What you see is only my face.	 05:23	19-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: point to NET article on CBS documentary 05:12	19-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Fringe?: example of NET reporting. 04:55	19-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: thanks, Franamax, go in peace. 04:46	19-04-09		User talk:Verbal	April 2006: new section 04:35	19-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 284671040 by Verbal (talk)preposterous reason given for removal. 04:22	19-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: respond to Beetstra with apology for possible misrepresentation. So confusing now that I'm not sure. 04:10	19-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: history and reason for request 03:46	19-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: you may consider there is a ban if you like, and we may consider there is none if we like. It's moot, in fact. 17:34	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: remove redundant secition, smalltext comment about it. 17:28	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: perhaps, Beetstra, I'll check. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, .... 17:27	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: perhaps, Beetstra, I'll check. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, .... 17:12	18-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Please restore User talk:JedRothwell: new section 17:06	18-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Barnstar: great work, Fritzpoll. 17:05	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: okay, I apologize, Beetstra, you are at least technically correct, once I examined the highlighted words. 16:54	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: to continue on the substance..... 15:59	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: tighten 15:57	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: fix ital, add not about block. 15:56	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: I don't get it, what "twist"? 15:29	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: respond to Noren's misunderstanding of my text. Address MastCell involvement. 14:14	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Misinterpretations: reply beginning 13:28	18-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	enabling banned users: fix link 13:28	18-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	enabling banned users: examination of ban argument. This is a poster boy for WP: "Community decisions" are not made except by a neutral close, closer becomes responsible. 13:06	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Discussion with Jed Rothwell moved from Talk:Cold fusion: comment 12:57	18-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fix permanent link to more complete transfer. 12:54	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Discussion with Jed Rothwell moved from Talk:Cold fusion: fuller content, I missed the earlier revert by Enric Naval. 12:48	18-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: Thanks, Verbal, much better than collapse or link to history. 12:43	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Discussion with User:Jed Rothwell| moved from Talk:Cold fusion: new section 12:38	18-04-09		User talk:Spartaz	Thanks, I'm flattered.: new section 12:29	18-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: no, there were three basic reasons given: "promotion" which wasn't, copyvio which didn't exist, and fringe *site*. 12:20	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: reference User:Abd/JedRothwell and note emerging process. 12:13	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: fmt 12:10	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: issues. and go away, Enric, just to make that clear for the record. 05:06	18-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: ref to removed discussion, so that remaining discussion has context. 04:49	18-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Enric, you can revert Rothwell, not Coppertwig 04:44	18-04-09		User:Abd/JedRothwell	create page reviewing edits of Jed Rothwell) (top 03:24	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: Thanks, Noren. That reminds me of how to proceed. 03:19	18-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: discussion was not as described. I did not voice any opinions other than my own, and I can bring in notable opinion from an expert, fringe or not. 22:53	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: one more, apparently. 22:52	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sheesh, how many times does it take? 22:49	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: fmt 22:49	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: the ACS seminar was a turning point, but it might have slipped below the radar. The CBS documentary is sealing the shift, quite likely, barring some spectacular refutation. 22:43	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: collapse discussion, it's long 22:41	17-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: intention to respond. 22:34	17-04-09		User talk:Abd	not exactly on break, though editing may be spotty. 22:33	17-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: what actions, exactly, were offensive? 22:12	17-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:BAN#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users: of course I'll stop because of the warning, but will pursue dispute resolution. 22:10	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: respond, cite presentation by Kitamura et al. 21:27	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	thanks, Verbal, I'll take responsibility for the freedom from abuse of this edit. 20:27	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: respond. 20:15	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: no bet, because this nitwit will erase the gratuitous paragraph, leaving the rest, which is of interest. The comment is still in history, of course. 17:31	17-04-09		User talk:Ronnotel	Thanks for your comments on the blacklist page: new section 16:50	17-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: agree with Ronnotel and be specific about it 15:52	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add NET report 15:44	17-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	fringe?: new subsection for newenergytimes.com 15:29	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: add ack of possibility of not-palladium. 15:18	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: thanks, Jed. No longer "fringe" but "cutting edge," still, I'm sure, controversial. 14:38	17-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Motion to close: agree with NCMV 02:41	17-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CBS Sixty Minutes to do a report on Cold fusion: new section 22:19	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment	Proposed solutions section in RFC/U: question probably moot at this time. 22:11	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Should the new possible "block while involved" be moved to the RfC page?: thanks, Fritzpoll, but I think the closing trumps this. 22:06	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Motion to close: agree, close. 22:03	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: please don't create more useless discussion 22:01	16-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Remove Proposed solutions section. I'm supporting Spartaz here, because I don't see further discussion here as serving a purpose. The time for this would have been a week ago. 21:54	16-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Ronnotel, I agree. At one time, I even would have agreed with "not RS," but I now see the matter as more complex. 21:41	16-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: there wasn't abuse going on when the sites were blacklisted. 17:58	16-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: *isn't reliable source* is not a legitimate reason for blacklisting in the absence of linkspam. 17:41	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: sign 17:41	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: sp 17:36	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: a separate Proposed resolution section is not needed, in fact. 17:24	16-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: respond to Verbal's flap. 17:01	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Claim of canvassing re certification: JzG's comment was misleading, but not wrong. Dtobias did certify, as the fourth certifier. Really moot. 16:41	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: Bilby is correct. 16:30	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Should the new possible "block while involved" be moved to the RfC page?: not quite consensus yet, my opinion. 16:25	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: create subsection for question 16:23	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	move to subsection of question asked by Rlevse 16:19	16-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/Notices#Advice_solicited_re_likely_appeal_to_ArbComm: respond to Coppertwig 16:17	16-04-09		User talk:Abd	Sigh: respond to FP and Verbal. 14:16	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: any objections to making a new RfC section on this? 14:07	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Claim of canvassing re certification: Thanks, Coppertwig. Why the comments about RfAr are appropriate here. 13:55	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: no objection to speedy close. 13:43	16-04-09		User talk:Abd	Sigh: sigh, indeed. 13:36	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: Thanks, Fritzpoll. More explanation of why it's here and why not in the RfC project page itself. 13:20	16-04-09		User talk:Abd	Sigh: Thanks, Fritzpoll, but I think you are incorrect, and that efforts should be directed in the other direction, asking JzG to resolve this quickly by acknowledging the obvious. 11:25	16-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: talk about dead horse. 11:14	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: including could be seen as harassment, Spartaz 11:03	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Comment on Jehochman's view: why I took out the desired outcome of apology. 02:39	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent JzG edit: it may not be as you see, Bilby 02:34	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: No, not to be added to the RfC itself. 02:20	16-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	New use of tools while involved.: new section 00:18	16-04-09		User talk:Peregrine Fisher	Your delisting request at MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist for aceshowbiz.com: new section 23:28	15-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	aceshowbiz.com: I'll advise the editor on editor's Talk. 23:14	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent JzG edit: Maybe you could do something useful, Spartaz. 23:02	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Claim of canvassing re certification: wikilink 23:01	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Claim of canvassing re certification: fmt 23:00	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Why is there no "Proposed solutions" section in this RfC?: see "Desired outcome." add new section re canvassing claim. 21:55	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent JzG edit: the summarization is legitimate and appreciated. 19:12	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent JzG edit: no claim that JzG broke a rule with this, just his own promise, relied upon by some for useless arguments here. 19:06	15-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lenr-canr.org: detailed response to Beetstra 17:19	15-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	distastefullness: Great, MM, good response. 17:04	15-04-09		User talk:Abd	compliments: talk is cheap, and therefore should be spent, in a good way, freely 11:08	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: it's *our* fault for not restraining JzG. 10:28	15-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: mudshield. 02:27	15-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	distastefullness: well, I tiptoed in, stood up on a soapbox, and made a long speech before remembering where I was. 01:41	15-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: long, unfortunately. It usually takes more words to counter deceptive arguments, and I don't have time to abstract this tonight. 00:04	15-04-09		User talk:Abd	the blacklisting at meta: lenr-canr.org subsection on the original meta blacklisting at JzG's request 21:49	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lenr-canr.org: long. Sorry, Beetstra, if you need abstracts, I'll write them. About my involvement with cold fusion at the moment. 19:11	14-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Guy. Kooks? Who was edit warring except for yourself, against consensus? 18:19	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	newenergytimes.com: specific arguments. 17:42	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lenr-canr.org: let's look at what you wrote, then, and correct any misunderstanding. 14:44	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lenr-canr.org: this gets into the content issue, big time. 13:55	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	newenergytimes.com: time to empty the can of worms and take a good look? 11:09	14-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: copy edit 11:06	14-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: thanks for being clear about your position, Beetstra 10:55	14-04-09		User talk:Abd	New Energy Times article: thanks, I've been thinking so myself 02:24	14-04-09		User talk:Coppertwig	distastefullness: peep! 01:52	14-04-09		New Energy Times	misc. citations, etc. 01:18	14-04-09		New Energy Times	acronym not needed 22:21	13-04-09		N ray	more accurate and complete. 21:35	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Arbcomm was mentioned as *not* making content decisions. That's what I wrote, you repeated it as if it contradicted me. Why? 18:39	13-04-09		User talk:Rlevse	Your question at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 18:21	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: the expanded use of the blacklist puts far-reaching content decisions into the hands of a small group of administrators that even ArbComm would not touch. 18:14	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: examples of abuse such that the blacklisting was appropriate? And is undue weight really an argument for blacklisting? That has to do with particular edits, in balance. Cutting out one side is not likely to result in balance! 17:38	13-04-09		New Energy Times	match other reference from article on alternating columnist at Analog 17:31	13-04-09		New Energy Times	a 15:48	13-04-09		New Energy Times	add news.science.com reference 15:26	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: agree, except that if content arguments are the reason for blacklisting, then blacklisting becomes a content decision. 13:53	13-04-09		User talk:Abd/Notices/Comments	link to archived discussion: Thanks, helpful.) (top) [rollback]	 12:21	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Thanks, Beetstra. Links will be highly scrutinized at the relevant articles, as with prior whitelisting for lenr-canr.org.	 11:27	13-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Point me to the decision.	 01:46	13-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: fmt	 01:45	13-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: sorry Cla68, I think I wasn't clear. 01:35	13-04-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion	Considerations: add Hoffman quote re calorimetry.) (top) [rollback]	 01:23	13-04-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion	essay at this point.	 23:42	12-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: only one complaint in this RfC, not the multiplicity of mirrors Phil flashes to distract	 19:40	12-04-09		Requests for adminship/Law	Support: support	 18:26	12-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: delist because there was and is no basis for listing. 15:31	12-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/Notices#Advice_solicited_re_likely_appeal_to_ArbComm: new section 15:24	12-04-09		User:Abd/Notices	Advice solicited re likely appeal to ArbComm: re proceeding to AC with the JzG charges.) (top) [rollback]	 13:50	12-04-09		Nikola Tesla	doesn't say "Military Border." Croation Krajina was a part of the Military Border region. More specific. Please discuss in Talk before making this removal again.	 04:01	12-04-09		New Energy Times	comma	 03:56	12-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: not worth debating.	 03:30	12-04-09		User:Abd/Lyrikline poets	mark links placed) (top) [rollback] 03:25	12-04-09		Durs Grünbein	External links: lyrikline.org) (top) [rollback]	 03:21	12-04-09		Richard Huelsenbeck	Audio: lyrikline.org	 03:18	12-04-09		Norbert Hummelt	External links: lyrikline.org page	 02:57	12-04-09		John Bockris	Cold fusion: correct year to 1989, and research continued at least well into the 1990s.	 01:42	12-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: The issue of administrative recusal has not been considered in any other forum where a decision was made on it. 19:50	11-04-09		New Energy Times	sp 19:38	11-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Recent abuse: respond to Rlevse, Skinwalker, and Spartaz 15:49	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	newenergytimes.com: add ref to draft article and delisting request 15:42	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikibreak.: fmt 15:40	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikibreak.: No, I haven't walked away. I'm busy. 15:18	11-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	Proposed removals: newenergytimes.com 14:38	11-04-09		New Energy Times	don't need the full name again. 14:35	11-04-09		New Energy Times	add new scientist source 14:19	11-04-09		New Energy Times	NEI is nonprofit. 14:18	11-04-09		New Energy Times	add Houston Chronicle source. page has vanished, but it was in the cache. 13:56	11-04-09		New Energy Times	journalist, capital 13:54	11-04-09		New Energy Times	begin stub 12:25	11-04-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Link to AE request re ScienceApologist: why I fully support SA's work on this revision and the community's effort to accomodate it. 03:17	11-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Reply to Fritzpoll's view: lenr-canr.org blacklisting was not reversed. 03:03	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	newenergytimes.com: this is redundant, will confuse links 02:59	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	newenergytimes.com 02:47	11-04-09		User talk:Abd	Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: collapse extended discussion 11:18	10-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: thanks for the pretty drawing, may I borrow your crayons? My mommy says, though, that you have to go away, she won't let you harass me any more. 03:58	10-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: link 03:56	10-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: fmt 03:55	10-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	recent RS reviiewing the topic of cold fusion: new section 17:03	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: Thanks, Coppertwig. You are correct. 16:34	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikibreak.: Thanks, Ikip, for moving the off-topic comment to the RfC/JzG talk page. Considerations. At length. Beware of dog-vomit slime mold. 13:19	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	Please check your email: okay, I will. 12:28	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	no hounding, but thanks. 12:07	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikibreak.: new section 12:03	09-04-09		User talk:Abd	wikibreak template 02:06	09-04-09		User talk:Off2riorob	True colors: True color: clean and clear, the color of a perfect mirror. 01:33	09-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by User:Ronnotel: clarify. The "linkspamming" claimed isn't prevented by the blacklist, you can see that here. There was no http:// 01:18	09-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: Rothwell is indeed an expert, and I intend to prove it. But not today and not here. It's not central. 01:03	09-04-09		User talk:Jehochman	Subheader: fmt 01:03	09-04-09		User talk:Jehochman	Subheader: With apologies, Jehochman, as always, it's your call what takes place on your Talk page. 00:36	09-04-09		Talk:Optics	Simple decision. Which is better, right now, Wikisource article or this one?: I'm not seeing any claim that the article there is not better. 21:02	08-04-09		Talk:Optics	By way of explanation: SA deserves full and open credit for good work. 20:39	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: explain mention of sysop bit. 20:36	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: if Hipocrite read the RfC, he didn't retain it. 2 websites, not one. 2 editors, not one. 20:21	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	On the closing of this RfC: "not standard"? Of course it's not standard! "Standard" isn't likely to resolve this short of ArbComm. But it's not my decision. I propose, you dispose. 18:09	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	On the closing of this RfC: Yes, Durova. However .... 18:05	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: JzG is not required to respond. He is merely allowed to. If he does not, there are natural consequences that are not punishment. 17:57	08-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll 17:50	08-04-09		User talk:Jehochman	Elegent, but useless: speak of the devil. 17:37	08-04-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Link to AE request re ScienceApologist: I don't think it should wait for the, what, five months? 17:19	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Guy, where are you?: thanks, Jehochman. Maybe it will work. It's getting late, though, the delay is itself a concern. Consider this disruption! 17:04	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	On the closing of this RfC: inadequate. Your move, community and TIA. 16:54	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Limits on RfC: Agreed completely. But then ..... 16:35	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	On the closing of this RfC: have it your way: Community, it's up to you. 16:26	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding: Administrators, absent emergency, must recuse themselves where involved.: new section 16:24	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding: JzG unilaterally and without notice at Cold fusion blacklisted two web sites relating to Cold fusion, supporting his own edits.: add long term. This was not mere routine removal of blacklisted links. 16:23	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding: JzG protected an article in his preferred version into a redirect to Cold fusion.: new section 16:20	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding: JzG unilaterally and without notice at Cold fusion blacklisted two web sites relating to Cold fusion, supporting his own edits.: new section 16:17	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding:JzG used administrative tools affecting Cold fusion and its editors: Get rid of this one for the moment, make more specific. 16:16	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding:(re block of editor while in dispute	 16:12	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding:JzG used administrative tools affecting Cold fusion and its editors: new section	 16:06	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Proposed finding:JzG was involved with Cold fusion: new section	 16:02	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	On the closing of this RfC: new section 15:32	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Comment on Jehochman's view: Done. 15:30	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Limits on RfC: new section 15:16	08-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	use strikout for removal per request by Jehochman, showing original text. Apology would be nice, but is not necessary. 15:13	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Comment on Jehochman's view: Sure, I'll check that. 15:10	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Guy, where are you?: Thanks, Jehochman. I hope he listens. 14:57	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Welcome, Rfwoolf, to Abd Talk. Beware my pet dog-vomit slime mold in the corner, but have some coffee or tea. Take your time. 14:48	08-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Cla68: replace subsection of Clas68 comment. This is not threaded reply, but extended comment within a comment section. 14:45	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Comment on Jehochman's view: explain my edit that will follow to the project page. 14:36	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: if what I write is too long, simple solution: don't read it. It's not an article edit or a warning! (it might contain a warning, but if I bury a warning, it's ineffective.	 14:32	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	reference to old self-RfC is no longer needed. If it reopens, I'll put it back.	 14:30	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: fmt	 14:30	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Thanks, Fritzpoll, you are always helpful.	 13:59	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia is just an encyclopedia: Thanks for the shocking information, Dr. Blofeld, I need to adjust my medication.	 11:05	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: there is no consensus. I'm not in charge. 10:52	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: Thanks. 04:03	08-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: this was an error. fix it. 03:15	08-04-09		User talk:LirazSiri	RFC on JzG: fmt 03:15	08-04-09		User talk:LirazSiri	RFC on JzG: fmt 03:15	08-04-09		User talk:LirazSiri	RFC on JzG: why this is different. 02:49	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: Go away. I suspect that's clear. 02:45	08-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Undid revision 282428951 by Mathsci (talk)This is so preposterous, I'm reverting. Please do not remove my additions, I did not change your header, you removed my content. 02:40	08-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Major lead problems: respond to Noren, mischaracterization of my prior Talk statement. 02:09	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: So rude, I'm afraid. My talk page. No obligation to read. So ... why not ignore it if it was too long? Something is drastically wrong wtih this place. 02:00	08-04-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Your self-reverted edits at Pan Am Flight 103: new section 01:45	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: fmt 01:43	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	I have to admit: glad I brightened your day. 01:29	08-04-09		Talk:Optics	Simple decision. Which is better, right now, Wikisource article or this one?: new section 01:14	08-04-09		User talk:Abd	On topic: beware of ABF 01:00	08-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll 00:46	08-04-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	UNVEILED: about using the work of Mistro12 00:27	08-04-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	Discussion concerning ScienceApologist: SA did not violate his ban, and is allowed to suggest anything he wants off-wiki. It's moot at this point. 00:17	08-04-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Link to AE request re Science Apologist: fix username and promise supportive comment at AE 00:15	08-04-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Optics: give notice subhead, while this isn't worthy of SA's attention, it's his right to see it or remove it. 00:13	08-04-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Undid revision 282443930 by KP Botany (talk)remove baiting, keep link to AE 23:59	07-04-09		User talk:98.240.215.87	General note: Editing tests on Talk:Egypt (disambiguation). (TW)) (top 23:57	07-04-09		Talk:Egypt (disambiguation)	Revert to the revision prior to revision 282451284 dated 2009-04-07 23:55:44 by 98.240.215.87 using popups 23:55	07-04-09		User talk:76.5.25.239	General note: Vandalism on Winternats. (TW)) (top 23:52	07-04-09		Winternats	Reverted edits by 76.5.25.239 (talk) to last version by Julianhope 23:34	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Hipocrite: remove argument against comment in comment section. Don't like this? Please revert me, taking responsibility for it. Hipocrite could clearly do that. 23:31	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Jehochman: bold acknowledgement about "apology" and removal from Desired Outcome. 23:30	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Comment on Jehochman's view: Acknowledgment of the error has been crucial in the past to ArbComm "forgiving" admin action while involved. #	 23:24	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: Thanks, Jehochman. 23:12	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Stay on target: no objection to rapid close, but some may, indeed, object, and for good reason. 23:01	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	RfC talk page: respond to Mathsci 22:26	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Or, why is Abd allowed to edit Cold Fusion pages, exactly?: Done, and start to clean up a little of the shit. 21:47	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Or, why is Abd allowed to edit Cold Fusion pages, exactly?: link 21:45	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subsection: I believe I can preface my comment with a section it's own subsection header. When editors ask for something silly but harmless, give it to them. 21:40	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subsection: refactor per polite Mathsci request. Anything else? 19:17	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subheader: give it a name 19:09	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subheader: if we want to know consensus, a modest proposal. 18:59	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subheader: Mathsci, stop trying to derail this user RfC with incivility and debate over content 18:49	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: link to discussion of additional history of blacklisting 18:38	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	Arbitration: Ignoring the RfC results is not an option for me, but even a landslide at RfC has no right to sanction or even discourage appeal to ArbComm, only ArbComm decides that. 18:24	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	Arbitration: if there is error in the evidence, now might be the time to point that out! 18:05	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: It was sincere and honest, not sarcastic at all, not belittling. And a story. 17:43	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	Arbitration: respond in detail to Spartaz 14:56	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subheader: Yes, Coppertwig, you got it right. Implications regarding ArbComm and inflammatory comments here. 13:33	07-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Subheader: on concise vs. extended. 03:26	07-04-09		Cold fusion	Methods that rely on the particular characteristics of lattice: simplify 03:24	07-04-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: attribute POV, it maybe should come out entirely, it's bullshit, but, hey, RS isRS. This should be updated, actually. 03:08	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Jehochman: clarify that "not been perfect" is inadequate. It was blatant violation. 03:04	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Jehochman: extra # not allowed. 03:03	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Jehochman: wherein User:Abd admits sekrit fringe doo-doo project while nefariously endorsing Jehochman comment to present appearance of reasonableness. 02:51	07-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: minor) (top) [rollback]	 02:48	07-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: fign and format	 02:47	07-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: depression is the bitter part of valerian root of all evil, and it is obviously late, too little sleep.	 02:30	07-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: On Bears. An Unexpected Suggestion?	 01:56	07-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Desired outcome: apology would be nice, but not necessary. Per Jehochman. 01:42	07-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: I understand the issue. "Apology" isn't the issue, really, it's an assurance that he *understands the problem.* 19:45	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	In response to JzG's comments: pop media coverage, peer-reviewed coverage is overwhelmingly on the low-energy nuclear reactions side. 19:42	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	In response to JzG's comments: I suppose I should answer this straight and to the point. 19:18	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: respond to Jehochman. I've been trying for months to encourage a friend of JzG to give him good advice. 18:50	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lyrikline.org: subsections 18:48	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lyrikline.org: add Beetstra original 18:46	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Lyrikline.org 17:40	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: I think we agree quite closely on this specific case, we still have work to do on overall policy or practice. 13:40	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: level 13:39	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: start subsection 13:32	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Groundrules and accepted background: fmt 13:30	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Groundrules and accepted background: comment on "unresolved disagreements. Example of original lenr-canr.org delisting closure.	 13:14	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	My thoughts on this	 11:26	06-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Cla68: Endorse. Over the line, head and shoulders, torso and feet.	 11:02	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: Arbcomm did not rule on JzG's request. The claim of Arbitration enforcement was rejected.	 05:13	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: I wouldn't object. 04:42	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Certification by Durova: Isn 04:12	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Advice: Thanks, Jehochman. But that wasn't sarcastic. I meant it. 03:08	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Certification by Durova: Admin recusal is not optional. It's the most reliable way to lose an admin bit. 02:40	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Certification: fmt 02:03	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Recusal when involved is not optional, some silly detail. 01:30	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Is certification invalid if a certifier is involved in a dispute? 01:08	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	Certification by Durova: certification based based on specific attempt to address admin recusal. I do know what I'm doing, even though I'm not Kim Bruning. 00:48	06-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/JzG 3	incomplete timeline of blacklisting of lenr-canr.org: the other items are not relevant to the RfC. 00:43	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Guy, You really know how to shoot yourself in the foot. Consider the other MfD you filed, the RfC was caused by that. 00:30	06-04-09		User talk:Abd	Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: you don't like me verbose, you will *really* not like me brief. 00:13	06-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by User:Ronnotel: endorse 23:46	05-04-09		User talk:Abd	Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: beware, reading this may be dangerous to your mental health. 19:49	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: okay, let's look at this. 19:29	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: format 19:26	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	DOE reviews question: inconclusive mechanism versus [promising?] observations?: The latest DOE review clearly considered the matter worthy of further research. 18:34	05-04-09		User talk:Ikip	RFC JZG 3: See below. I agree, Spartaz. Especially about "smartened up." 18:32	05-04-09		User talk:Ikip	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 18:20	05-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: and apologize. 18:16	05-04-09		User talk:GoRight	Don't poke the bear: WARNING, for your wikihealth, do not make one more edit before you redact and apologize. 16:05	05-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: Thanks, Fritzpoll, and clarify one point. 15:31	05-04-09		Cold fusion	This is much more accurate. There was no "long series of replication failures," and how could the consensus of 1989 be based on such? The text here contradicted the article. 15:06	05-04-09		User talk:Abd	Your debate on User talk:Beetstra: Thanks for the warning, Fut. Perf. It's actually helpful. 14:56	05-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: clarify: JzG was not sufficiently involved as of December 7, 2007, to require admin recusal. 14:19	05-04-09		User talk:Wfaxon	On the fence about Cold fusion: new section 13:37	05-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: point by point, about right here, right now. 04:28	05-04-09		User:Abd/Lyrikline poets	here I was all hot for this Portuguese Cutie, but it was just an Excel screw-up 04:25	05-04-09		User:Abd/Lyrikline poets	itals for done links 04:23	05-04-09		User:Abd/Lyrikline poets	itals for done links 04:22	05-04-09		Mascha Kaléko	External links: lyrikline.org) (top) [rollback]	 04:18	05-04-09		Ernst Jandl	External links: add lyrikline.org link) (top) [rollback] 04:13	05-04-09		Marie Luise Kaschnitz	External links: lyrikline.org 04:08	05-04-09		Michael Lentz	expand reference text) (top) [rollback]	 04:08	05-04-09		Michael Lentz	External links: not needed	 04:06	05-04-09		Michael Lentz	cite reference	 03:58	05-04-09		Michael Lentz	External link: lyrikline.org	 03:51	05-04-09		Paul Maar	External links: actualy add link!	 03:49	05-04-09		Paul Maar	External links: lyrikline.org	 03:41	05-04-09		User:Abd/Lyrikline poets	add a standard link text 03:23	05-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: clarify 03:22	05-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: your choice, Dirk. 03:13	05-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 01:42	05-04-09		User talk:66.253.210.220	Warning: Userpage vandalism on User:Fritzpoll. (TW)) (top 01:41	05-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Reverted edits by 66.253.210.220 (talk) to last version by Tiamut 01:36	05-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Prior RfC regarding JzG: separate present RfC summary from prior RfC, may have caused some confusion. 01:17	05-04-09		User talk:LirazSiri	Be calm, be patient: congratulations, LS 01:01	05-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: maybe it's something about limerick. 01:00	05-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: don't worry about it, Enric, but do be careful about how you present sources and for what purpose. 16:31	04-04-09		User:Abd/Notices	MfD for User:Abd/JzG: This notice is covered by a later one, remove. 16:30	04-04-09		User:Abd/Notices	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new certification by Durova and Petri Krohn appeared. 16:13	04-04-09		User talk:Durova	A suggestion: support the initiative by SA and Durova. 16:05	04-04-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Cold fusion publication decision: add note from later reading. 14:36	04-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: add link 14:31	04-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: well, that was unfortunate. Sorry. 05:51	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Users certifying the basis for this dispute: I think this can come out now, okay, Spartaz? 05:44	04-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: No problem, Enric. Makes things clearer anyway. Nice try. 05:25	04-04-09		Requests for comment/User conduct	JzG 3 now certified again. Thanks, Spartaz. 05:21	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	View by Durova: endorse 05:20	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by DGG: endorse 03:37	04-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 02:43	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: date deletion of CMNS Talk page, this was not old. 02:39	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: date archiving of Talk page 02:03	04-04-09		User talk:Petri Krohn	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 01:59	04-04-09		User:Abd/Notices	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: certification withdrawn, RfC will be deleted if not certified. 01:57	04-04-09		User talk:Durova	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 01:48	04-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Users certifying the basis for this dispute: Agree with Spartaz re restarting clock for cert. 01:35	04-04-09		User talk:Enric Naval	JzG RFC: you can withdraw certification, Enric, though it merely will increase wikidrama. 01:00	04-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 2): something is happening and I don't know what it is, or do I, Mr. Jones? 20:26	03-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: 99.999% of Wikipedia editors do not agree with you. Is that the claim? 20:23	03-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: fix name 20:22	03-04-09		User talk:Abd	RFC JZG3: Thanks, Spartaz. Please be specific as to "crusade." 20:18	03-04-09		User talk:Beetstra	Your comment in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3: new section 18:29	03-04-09		User talk:Enric Naval	JzG RFC: I was surprised, myself. Apparently, though, he considers there to be a real dispute here, regardless of "side." 18:08	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Outside view by Coppertwig: Endorse 17:29	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Prior RfC regarding JzG: Gentle reminders have not worked. Hopefully, my last edit to this RfC beyond possible endorsements. 17:01	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	IP edit about: finish the section head! 17:00	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 1): Science News is RS, but that doesn't mean that we drop common sense! 16:39	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports (arbitrary break 1): please don't ask for the use of non-RS to source article text here. We have enough trouble wtih RS! 16:23	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	IP edit about: more clear? 16:18	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	IP edit about: new section 16:05	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": a memoir of a notable person is usable no matter how much later it was written, if attributed. 14:28	03-04-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	UNVEILED: thanks, Mistro12. 04:20	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: about the Petit article. 03:58	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": Fleischmann's recollections, even though later, are usable. 03:38	03-04-09		User:Abd/Notices	/* Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3 filed. 03:21	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	JzG long involved with Cold fusion: remove old snippet 03:19	03-04-09		Requests for comment/User conduct	Approved pages (users): duh, you mean you put da bold outside o da brackets? 03:17	03-04-09		Requests for comment/User conduct	add Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3 03:14	03-04-09		User talk:JzG	Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: new section 03:09	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	timestamp 03:02	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	moved User:Abd/JzG/RfC to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: file RfC 03:02	03-04-09		User:Abd/JzG/RfC	moved User:Abd/JzG/RfC to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG3: file RfC 03:01	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	not a draft any more. a gale? or a breeze? or just dead air? we'll see. 03:00	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Prior RfC regarding JzG: what happened to the first JzG RfC? not certified? What? 02:59	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Community attempt: prior RfCs 02:51	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Community attempt: copy edit 02:41	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Applicable policies: ref Misuse of adminstrative tools policy 02:36	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Desired outcome: ask for affirmation of action while involved. 02:33	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Community attempt 02:31	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Attempt by Abd: move RfAr section 02:30	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Attempt by Abd: finish up 00:52	03-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: clarify to make sure it's not misunderstood, these sections not written by the editors -- except mine. 00:46	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: stuff stuff 00:39	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: add some stuff. fix stuff. 00:04	03-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: interesting set of sources, please read them carefully. Simon, not Shamoo. 22:55	02-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": I wouldn't suggest covering both in the same article, there need to be two articles. But ... 22:35	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: bold one principle 22:33	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: how the guideline treats fringe. It is not the way fringe has been treated by many editors at Cold fusion. 21:34	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: open secret. look again, Enric, please reread and reflect, it may help you. 16:29	02-04-09		User:Synergy/Durova	clarity 16:25	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: respond re claims about outside editor communications. 15:49	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: hmph! Okay, Verbal show me your editorial skill. 15:28	02-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: Dog bites man. 15:01	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: address the issue specifically 14:49	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: fmt 14:46	02-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": short collapse was not useful and contentious. 14:43	02-04-09		User talk:Sarcasticidealist	Glad you're gone: Yeah, the password could be quite useful. 14:42	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: format 14:39	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: respond to Enric. 14:09	02-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: I'm proposing that we prefer peer-reviewed publication over other reliable sources, not that we exclude anything in reliable source. 13:12	02-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: evidence for anomalous inertia in fingers from excessive editing of Wikipedia. 04:11	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: extend ital 04:10	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: fmt 04:08	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: explicit 04:07	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: 46 edits 04:04	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Users certifying the basis for this dispute: two certs, will move to RfC space tomorrow. (need to stop now, want to make proper notification, etc.) 04:02	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Jed Rothwell and alleged copyvio: okay, I think it's all here now. 03:49	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	JzG long involved with Cold fusion: add 140 edits to Talk:Cold fusion 03:45	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	JzG long involved with Cold fusion: add list of 64 edits to Cold fusion 03:40	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	JzG long involved with Cold fusion: librarian 03:39	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Statement of the dispute: stuff 03:35	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: minor 03:19	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: shorten wikilink display 03:14	02-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Statement of the dispute: edit per suggestions 02:37	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: fmt 02:34	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: gude for the perplexed 02:00	02-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: yeah, interesting. Rothwell is a writer, sometimes it's tragic what Wikipedia does to writers. It's the old battle, writer vs. editor. 20:07	01-04-09		Instant-runoff voting	Usually allows one ballot to determine a majority winner: example of majority and monotonicity failure 19:48	01-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/JzG 18:36	01-04-09		User talk:CambridgeBayWeather	Your close of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/JzG: sign it 18:36	01-04-09		User talk:CambridgeBayWeather	Your close of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/JzG: About your deletion of the page. 18:25	01-04-09		User:Abd/JzG	fmt) (top) [rollback]	 18:25	01-04-09		User:Abd/JzG	note re deletion of page.	 18:19	01-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	by Abd: add attempts to resolve by Petri Krohn and Durova.	 16:15	01-04-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: add AN/I discussion of abuse of admin powers.	 15:59	01-04-09		Mad scientist	Undid revision 281096966 by Abd (talk)oops! random mouse click in the wrong place! 15:58	01-04-09		Mad scientist	Reverted 1 edit by JzG identified as vandalism to last revision by 65.242.170.253. (TW) 15:48	01-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: Thanks. Was there a Talk page attached? 15:46	01-04-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/Cold fusion controversy: Thanks. 15:42	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: V is basically correct. 15:32	01-04-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Request for userification of Cold fusion controversy: new section 13:32	01-04-09		Talk:Rashad Khalifa	Disposition of the "sexual misconduct" case.: new section 11:23	01-04-09		Rashad Khalifa	Criminal Charges: oops! fix reversal of meaning 11:21	01-04-09		Rashad Khalifa	Criminal Charges: get rid of conjunction 'however' since no contradiction. 11:20	01-04-09		Rashad Khalifa	Criminal Charges: English 04:33	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": remove collapse. I'll refactor this tomorrow if I have time, ''friendly" and selective collapse welcome.	 04:31	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CR-39 and positive and negative results.: remove inappropriate collapse of discussion with erroneous hatnote.	 04:27	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: remove half paren	 04:26	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: be careful Phil. You want comment, you might get it. Try WP:DR, it works. Change hatnote to neutral.	 04:10	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: fun. Got some book reports to write. So much reliable source, so little time. 03:58	01-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: sorry for the unnecessary work, Enric. What made you think you needed to do that? 03:46	01-04-09		User talk:Abd	looooooong comments at Talk:Cold fusion: I just hate it when people present conclusive evidence for the obvious as if it were a contradiction to what I've said, when it confirms it.