User:Abd/2009 contributions/January

22:03	31-01-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: long, but .... reading certainly isn't obligatory, Naval isn't being warned! 18:50	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reliability of patent authorship for purposes of to-do item 1?: maybe usable in some way. 18:47	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Condensed Matter Physics Gets Stranger: Yes, strange. Like, uh, "cold fusion." 18:24	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: fix some minor stuff 18:20	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: yes, back to discussing this article, please! 16:51	31-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: sad, but not unexpected 16:42	31-01-09		User talk:PHG	Reconsider: or trusted by the user 16:41	31-01-09		User talk:PHG	Reconsider: good luck; a possible alternative. 16:18	31-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Proposed decision	I think I am leaving: sad. comment on the implications. 14:40	31-01-09		User talk:Abd	Commentary by Fritzpoll: Thanks, Dtobias 14:30	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: fmt 14:29	31-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: it's relevant here. 13:21	31-01-09		User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Taking arguments back to the Dispute page: Great work, both of you.) (top) [rollback]	 21:49	30-01-09		User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Taking arguments back to the Dispute page: new section	 21:36	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	reverting banned editors: did you read the evidence page, User;Abd/JzG?	 21:31	30-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: Agree with Roger Davies	 21:00	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	Commentary by Fritzpoll: reply to Fritzpoll 20:57	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	reverting banned editors: on this. 17:30	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	reverting banned editors: complete this a bit. 17:29	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	reverting banned editors: respond to EN. 17:20	30-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell topic ban confirmed: ArbComm didn't rule. That means that individual arbitrator opinions, issued before evidence was in place, are dicta. 13:46	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	reverting banned editors: how would you suggest we resolve this dispute, Enric. 07:24	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	What's your read so far?: the fringe science arbitration seems to be going well, if slowly. 07:12	30-01-09		User talk:Abd	What's your read so far?: block of JedRothwell. My, my, it's Dead Horse Day. 06:46	30-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	About your comment in JzG's RfAr: Ah, darn it! You got me started.... sorry. 06:22	30-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: link to JzG talk page before archiving, with discussion of this. 06:08	30-01-09		User talk:Gen ato	comments from banned editors: good luck. 06:00	30-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: comment on Rothwell and JzG. 05:48	30-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 267298977 by JzG (talk)JzG, you should not be the one to do this if it's going to be done. 04:28	30-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: refer to evidence page re JzG's involvement in dispute with Rothwell and over Cold fusion in general, abuse of admin tools. 23:08	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Three Wikipedia's Pillars that don't seems respected at the voice "Cold fusion": with apologies to Gen ato 19:37	29-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: No, not hounding. I was done. JzG, I regret any difficulties this may have or may cause you. 19:01	29-01-09		User talk:Dtobias	your comment at RfAr: new section 18:24	29-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: Rothwell is already blocked, that's the status quo. 17:31	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: fmt 17:30	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: fmt 17:29	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: very dangerous 17:12	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: Puzzled. Apparent misunderstanding. 17:04	29-01-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: fix error 17:02	29-01-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Your comment in the RfAr on Cold fusion topic bans: new section 16:31	29-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	About your comment in JzG's RfAr: new section 16:11	29-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: about the SPA charges. Remove redundant comments from introduction. 15:30	29-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: Rothwell did not publish Pcarbonn's article. 15:26	29-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Abd: respond to suggestion of "apply the topic ban." 15:06	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: JzG escalated to ArbComm, not clear why. There wasn't an AN report, wasn't anything but a request to unblock. 14:20	29-01-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by Jehochman: Statement by User:Abd 13:44	29-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: tad premature? 13:40	29-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Just to note that Guy's !vote is redundant. 13:38	29-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: add Merge option 13:34	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: the implications of the AfD here. 13:21	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of CR-39 image: image captions don't have to be sentences. 13:08	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: image easy to replace, but what we need is more difficult: better cooperation 02:45	29-01-09		User talk:GoRight	Argument with JzG: new section 02:15	29-01-09		User talk:Abd	Interesting secondary sources: pyroelectric fusion is hot fusion. Very hot. Very small. 00:37	29-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: my, my, my. 00:03	29-01-09		User talk:Abd	Interesting secondary sources: Oxford University Press. 23:40	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Interesting secondary sources: about the sources. Thanks for looking. Let me know what you find. 22:37	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Improving the outline: There are really two different subjects, one is about history, the other about current science. 22:25	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: added section on CR-39 image 22:22	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of CR-39 image: new section 21:43	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: rubbing salt in his wounds? 16:53	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: The V word is unnecessary. Be nice. 16:46	28-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: sign it! 16:45	28-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: respond to Phil153: yes, the decision should be made by editors at Cold fusion. 16:39	28-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: respond to Enric Naval 16:32	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The image of the SPAWAR cell that adorned the article: new section 15:44	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Arguing with JzG: more reply to Dan 14:52	28-01-09		Cold fusion	return inage of CR-39 with faint smell of weasel cleaned out. 14:45	28-01-09		User talk:Noren	CF Images and Copyright: no problem. 14:12	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: new section 14:01	28-01-09		Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Keep 13:52	28-01-09		User talk:Aitias/archive 3	Your deletion of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: Thanks. 13:48	28-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: An expert (fringe or not) on the topic makes many posts to Talk and signs with his title? This is not linkspam, but it's also not relevant. 05:03	28-01-09		User talk:Noren	CF Images and Copyright: can the grant of copyright made with upload be revoked? 04:50	28-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: add Physchim62 arbitration. 04:42	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Topic Ban: I'm working on it, Phil. 04:27	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Arguing with JzG: fmt 04:27	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Arguing with JzG: don't understand the reference to BADSITES 04:22	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Arguing with JzG: not arguing: making a due process request, hopefully adequately expressed. It's his choice how to respond. 04:10	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: what do readers expect to find? 03:55	28-01-09		User talk:Abd	Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: I have no magic solution. 01:17	28-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: I think you blocked the wrong IP in December. Not Rothwell. 01:01	28-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Arguments of Rtol: remove the signature; does everyone agree that these are arguments of Rtol?) (top) [rollback]	 01:00	28-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Arguments of Skipsievert: move discussion to Talk. Thanks for starting, Skip.	 00:57	28-01-09		User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	move Skip Sievert discussion from Dispute page; summary listing arguments should be taken back.	 00:46	28-01-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Flagged Revisions? that's important! 00:42	28-01-09		User talk:Gen ato	Inserting Material into Cold Fusion: about the questions and censorship 00:39	28-01-09		User talk:Gen ato	Inserting Material into Cold Fusion: Welcome, sorry it might seem unfriendly. Back up, read the history, become familiar; it will make more sense. 00:28	28-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	copy of edit by Gen ato: Welcome, Gen ato. Yes, there may be some improvements needed. Discuss. Be patient. 00:10	28-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: add not about IP editor's immediate self-reversion 00:07	28-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: well, no diffs, but a list of IP contribution pages. 23:23	27-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: don't say I didn't ask. 19:45	27-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 266767212 by Enric Naval (talk)do not remove Talk comments that have been responded to. 19:41	27-01-09		User talk:JzG	Your block of 208.89.102.50: new section 19:33	27-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: Topic ban on one person applied to another with no evidence of meat puppetry? Novel, for sure. 19:22	27-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: wording 16:30	27-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: please approve or deny this whitelist request, it's been more than a week. 18:19	26-01-09		User talk:Abd	Pseudoscience, Fringe science, or Questionable science: respond to GoRight 15:40	26-01-09		User talk:Abd	Topic Ban: I understand. 15:25	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	copy of edit by Gen ato: Arata not some backyard bozo. 15:22	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	copy of edit by Gen ato: respond to JzG. 15:08	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	arbitrary section break: good demonstration of why we don't do synthesis 14:49	26-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	explain better, hopefully 14:45	26-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Arguments of Firebladed: move discussion to Talk, solicit summary to come back here. 14:42	26-01-09		User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	moved from Disputes page as being of the nature of a discussion. 14:28	26-01-09		User talk:Abd	Did you post to my page as an IP: Yes, I did. Damn autologout! Something isn't working right. Anyway, thanks Fritzpoll. (removing, not needed here.) 14:25	26-01-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	are you allowed to delete people's comments to avoid responding to criticism?: Yes, it was me. 06:04	26-01-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 265762555 by StevenBKrivit (talk)Hmmph! I think it looks nice. 05:53	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Revert by TS of substantial new material in lead: I agree with the reversion. 05:42	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Meaningless Break: don't harass the poor Guy! 05:34	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	arbitrary section break: denying massive program and encouraging research under existing programs are not an error. 02:49	26-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Male Urination: BTW, take that IP out of your signature! 02:47	26-01-09		User talk:Aether22	My comment: good move, Aether22. 02:38	26-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Male Urination: I agree. 02:35	26-01-09		User talk:Rtol	January 2009: Thanks, Richard. 02:30	26-01-09		User talk:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Please don't sign comments or write in the first or second person on the user page, except for "we" referring to what "we" should do, for example, under arguments. 02:28	26-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Arguments of Rtol: This is an NPOV consensus page. Put in third person; here, it is under Tol's arguments, so it refers to what he thinks we should do. Don't sign contributions here. 02:18	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Topic ban reminding: Ah, leave it to Rothwell. He hasn't been banned, but it could be arranged. 02:03	26-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Topic ban reminding: Right, Enric. Be my guest. Let me know if I'm mentioned so I can hide under a rock. Or not. 01:58	26-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: Right, Coppertwig 01:21	26-01-09		User talk:Noren	CF Images and Copyright: about the image that *was* deleted. 00:52	26-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: respond to Tony. More tea? 23:42	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: Okay, you've got my interest! 23:34	25-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Topic ban reminding: detailed response to claims of a ban. 22:51	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: obsessively correct date stamp (signed late) 22:49	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: sign it. 22:46	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: Welcome to my Talk, Tony. 20:50	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: look at the results. You lost a little, but you also gained quite a bit. Watch. 20:28	25-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	What text relating to Thermoeconomics is appropriate in Energy economics?: fmt 20:27	25-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	What text relating to Thermoeconomics is appropriate in Energy economics: question mark 20:27	25-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	Instructions on the use of this page by Abd: set the tone! 20:26	25-01-09		User:Abd/Dispute over thermoeconomics	start page for dispute description 20:07	25-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Proposed additions to the article on related fields: how to approach the stronger disagreements 19:53	25-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Proposed additions to the article on related fields: thanks for pursuing consensus 15:12	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: a witch hunt is to be rigorously avoided. 01:40	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: fmt 01:35	25-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: okay, what's wrong with the Pcarbonn ban? The basis is astonishingly unclear, I've seen little worse from ArbComm. 17:16	24-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Proposed additions to the article on related fields: Good, Skip; Rtol, what could you accept? 17:11	24-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Proposed additions to the article on related fields: format as new section. turn over a new leaf. 17:05	24-01-09		User talk:Abd	cold fusion report recommendation: please remember to assume good faith. I have requested undeletion from the closing admin. 17:01	24-01-09		Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop	General discussion: this may not be the right format, please correct if appropriate 17:00	24-01-09		Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Workshop	Comment by Abd 16:58	24-01-09		User talk:Aitias/archive 3	Your deletion of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: new section 16:50	24-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: Yes, there was. I linked to it! 14:13	24-01-09		User talk:Abd	Standing Offer/Request: Thanks, GoRight. 14:05	24-01-09		User talk:Abd	Question: Excellent that you sought help. 13:52	24-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Question: About Rtol and dangers involved in judging edit warring. 13:27	24-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Question: I'm on it, Jehochman. 12:50	24-01-09		User talk:Rtol	January 2009: new section 12:41	24-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Edit warring on this article, please stop. This is a friendly warning.: Good, Skip.Thanks for backing down. 01:07	24-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	what belongs: Slow down. Discuss, don't continue reverting. Ask for help and independent comment. Both of you have done that, which is why I'm here. 00:59	24-01-09		Talk:Energy economics	Edit warring on this article, please stop. This is a friendly warning.: new section 00:44	24-01-09		Editor assistance/Requests	energy economics: I'm investigating the situation and expect to advise the involved editors. 00:29	24-01-09		User talk:Abd	Question: okay, I'll look at it. 21:20	23-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Topic ban reminding: Rothwell not banned. Irritating, perhaps, but not banned. 19:56	23-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: add a word to emphasize credibility, which the weight of the evidence elsewhere shows 19:46	23-01-09		User talk:JzG	Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: Of course I'll watch the article as I can. Let me know if I miss something. 19:41	22-01-09		User talk:Abd	Your request: thanks, Sarcasticidealist 19:36	22-01-09		User talk:Sarcasticidealist	Request for copy of deleted page.: damn autologout! sign it! 19:24	22-01-09		User talk:Phil153	A response to the messages you archived: my condolences, Phil 19:04	22-01-09		User talk:JzG	Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: thanks for recusing yourself. 16:53	22-01-09		User talk:JzG	Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: Thanks, JzG 15:54	22-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Balance, Shanahan, as a published author on this, deserves respect. 04:55	22-01-09		User talk:JzG	Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: correct. Not COI, but "involved" 04:43	22-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: it's not actually linkspam. 04:20	22-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: I'd say it isn't spam. Yet these posts were the weak evidence cited in the blacklisting. 20:22	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: fmt 20:21	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Please be more helpful, Rothwell, and less confrontive. It might look like it to you, but this isn't a battle with sides. 18:39	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: be careful, Kirk. 18:16	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	reply to first KS comment 17:49	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: move Shanahan comment do re-unite my own. 17:45	21-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: no credible allegation of copyright violation. Unreliability is a complex editorial judgment which should be made by editors of involved articles. 16:39	21-01-09		User talk:Pavlov2009	no conflict with privacy policy 16:27	21-01-09		Talk:Urination	Semiprotected: Aether22 blocked for two weeks now. 16:25	21-01-09		Talk:Urination	Semiprotected: sad case 16:18	21-01-09		User talk:Aether22	IP not blocked: successful IP edit shortly before the "will this possibly work" edit. 16:13	21-01-09		User talk:Aether22	IP not blocked: wikilawyering: Wikipedia isn't a court and rule of law (as we ordinarily think of it) doesn't apply here. Raising technicalities falls on its face. 15:56	21-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Please copy to Urination Talk: arrgh. I tried, and, I suppose, this is one last try. 15:22	21-01-09		User talk:JzG	Talk:Condensed matter nuclear science: "fringe" isn't really a cause to delete an article Talk page: what was the necessity? 14:42	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Calorimetry subarticle userfied. Kirk, your help is greatly appreciated. 04:07	21-01-09		User talk:Abd	Your request: no harm in asking. 03:57	21-01-09		User talk:Phil153	Where is this going?: reply to Rothwell 02:56	21-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The Major Fallacies of Cold Fusion: Shanahan's explanation is background. 02:43	21-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: I didn't quote ArbComm. Here, in fact, you did. 23:41	20-01-09		User talk:Sarcasticidealist	Request for copy of deleted page.: request another. 23:26	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: Your point, Phil? 23:24	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: Allegations. We should base article balance on them? 19:14	20-01-09		User talk:Phil153	My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: responses to Phil, but mostly to Jed Rothwell. 15:39	20-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Jimmy Wales vision: assume good faith. 15:24	20-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelist: the link was helpful, Rothwell, the rest wasn't. 15:22	20-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelist: about the blacklisting, and a whitelist proposal. 15:18	20-01-09		User talk:Abd/IP	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: respond to Rothwell. 14:55	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	cold fusion report recommendation: about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments 14:39	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: about Robert M. Carter 14:23	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: thanks, Phil153. 14:21	20-01-09		User talk:Abd	FYI: Removing sourced material: thanks, GoRight. 21:32	19-01-09		User talk:Phil153	My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: Phil, you lost me with "wanker." This is the thinking behind your editing? 20:56	19-01-09		User talk:Abd	Your request 20:20	19-01-09		User talk:Sarcasticidealist	Request for copy of deleted page.: new section 19:13	19-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: summary: there was no linkspamming; there was usage by legitimate editors; therefore blacklisting was an error. 19:11	19-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: summary. 05:17	19-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions	Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: if implemented in a stupid way, it would be stupid. 05:12	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: Jed has answered the question: he has permission for what he hosts. 05:02	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion/Archive 19	Undid revision 264690813 by Verbal (talk)this discussion went back to Talk. 05:01	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 264712636 by Noren (talk)moved back to Talk 05:01	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion/Archive 19	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: move Noren comment from archive to here. 04:55	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: It was Verbal 04:38	19-01-09		User talk:Phil153	CF discussion: asking about your skepticism, Phil. Really, can you point me to some cogent and recent criticism? 04:13	19-01-09		User talk:Phil153	My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: Rothwell asserts both publisher and author permissions. 04:04	19-01-09		User talk:Phil153	My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: format and minor error 04:01	19-01-09		User talk:Phil153	My response to your message at Cold Fusion talk: abuse of the blacklist. 03:44	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: not off topic. 03:22	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Surrealistic discussion of LENR-CANR.org and Jed Rothwell: Jed, please use your registered account. 03:05	19-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 264690626 by Verbal (talk)This is an important discussion. I'm pulling it all in, may put a collapse box on it. 03:00	19-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions	Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: reverting is editing, not sighting. 02:56	19-01-09		User talk:LeadSongDog	whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: No evidence that the bibliography is biased. Rothwell has for a long time invited critical papers. 02:45	19-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: about NET and the RSN discussion, very old edits, and the absence of linkspamming 01:54	19-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions	Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: worried? so don't do it! 19:49	18-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Jimmy Wales vision: not useful, Aether22 19:39	18-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: basic mistake: attachment to being right. Even if you are right! Attachment clouds your judgment. 17:21	18-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions	Why flagged revisions is essential to fixing the problems of scale and reliability: new section 16:26	18-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Flagged revisions/Trial/Votes	Supports 301-400: support. essential for scale and reliability, maintains freedom but channels it. 22:45	17-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: no adequate reason for blacklisting has been given, only arguments over matters which should be left to editorial consensus in articles. 19:17	16-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: on work on CR-39 18:34	16-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: The IP edits wouldn't be a basis for the block. 18:13	16-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: well, I tried. 18:00	16-01-09		User talk:LeadSongDog	ultimately scorn: there was and is scorn and derision. "Ultimately" is definitely wrong. The jury is out. 17:55	16-01-09		User talk:LeadSongDog	whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: and evidence of selection bias in the bibliography? 17:34	16-01-09		User talk:Abd	cold fusion report recommendation: Of course. We could point to the recent research, if we could agree on it and how to frame it. But I'm not proposing that yet. 02:58	16-01-09		User talk:LeadSongDog	whitelisting of lenr-canr.org bibliography.: new section 02:55	16-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: "fringe" is irrelevant to blacklisting. The decision as to whether or not a source is usable is an editorial decision, not generallhy an admin one. 02:16	16-01-09		User talk:JzG	Confused??: thanks anyway. 02:02	16-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: okay, advice. 01:26	16-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: the quoted material is from about a page before the quoted "conclusions," in the "summary." 01:12	16-01-09		User talk:Abd	Confused: here we are in the real world of Wikipedia, some sort of hybrid of dream, fantasy, and nightmare. And an encyclopedia. 00:52	16-01-09		User talk:Abd	Aether22 block: respond to Tryptofish. 17:54	15-01-09		User talk:GoRight	Thanks and warning: be nice, don't take any wooden nickels. 17:43	15-01-09		User talk:JzG	Confused??: Aether22 was blocked. 17:29	15-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: fix link 17:27	15-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: Noren reverted.... sigh. 17:21	15-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: not cherry picked. 16:57	15-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell: pay attention, folks, the air is full of smoke and some mirrors, hosts of irrelevant and inaccurate arguments about this. 16:35	15-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell: This really has nothing to do with Jed Rothwell, it's about Wikipedia guidelines. 16:13	15-01-09		Talk:Urination	Appropriateness of photo: Aether22 blocked for a week. 16:05	15-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: strike prior response, I did more research. slow down, Aether. One step at a time. 15:28	15-01-09		User talk:Aether22	Blocked for 1 week: that's excessive for a naive editor who hasn't been warned about the alleged misbehavior. 15:21	15-01-09		User talk:JzG	Confused??: here's the explanation, Aether22. 04:46	15-01-09		User talk:Aether22	General note: Refactoring others' talk page comments on User talk:JzG. (TW) 04:41	15-01-09		User talk:JzG	Undid revision 264179238 by Aether22 (talk) 04:40	15-01-09		User talk:JzG	Undid revision 264179577 by Aether22 (talk)user revised content not his contribution 04:39	15-01-09		User talk:JzG	undo Durova edit temporarily to rollback improper restoration of content that had been archived by JzG 23:51	13-01-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: try again with modification based on Talk. 23:36	13-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: my history with this topic. 19:39	13-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: about NPOV and sourcing. 15:37	13-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: respond to Phil 15:26	13-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: about admin abuse and our need for community. 15:14	13-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: on Mr. Krivit's comment. 08:03	13-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard	GoRight community discussion (cont'd): about that supposedly most-supported comment in the GoRight RfC.... 07:30	13-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard	GoRight community discussion (cont'd): respond to Raul654 06:45	13-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard	GoRight community discussion (cont'd): GoRight, as the Family Dog said, may the baby Jesus shut your mouth and open your mind. 06:13	13-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: about the 1989 report and balance and some dicta 04:59	13-01-09		User talk:Durova	Response: now that we've finished that, about JzG.... can you advise or mediate? 04:13	13-01-09		User talk:Abd	lenr-canr.org: the plot thickens, Petri and Dtobias 03:33	13-01-09		User talk:DGG	Advice requested re the spam blacklist: thanks again, DGG. 03:22	13-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: point to specific page for quote 23:42	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: add link to related request. 23:37	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: Thanks for asking, Durova. 23:14	12-01-09		User talk:Durova	Response: whose blood? Will mine do? 20:07	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	PHG improved sourcing methods: add point about error rate. 20:05	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	PHG improved sourcing methods: the source substantiates what was said here, and that isn't contradicted by other facts in the source. 19:54	12-01-09		User talk:Durova	Response: be nice, kids! 19:44	12-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: It's not, actually a true "fringe" field. It's a minority field, largely rejected, but still open for research. 19:26	12-01-09		User talk:JzG	lenr-canr.org: briefly, was your addition to the blacklist a legitimate use of your admin tools? 19:16	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: the history of the blacklisting and what edits preceded it. 19:03	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	newenergytimes.com: explain how the blacklisting took place. 18:38	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org (original thread): add note re fixing link. 18:36	12-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org (original thread): fix link, subject changed. 18:07	12-01-09		User talk:Petri Krohn	Notable Gaels: comment on lists. 18:04	12-01-09		User talk:Petri Krohn	belated condolences and welcome back.: new section 16:42	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	PHG improved sourcing methods: respond to Latebird and to Septentrionalis 16:25	12-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Balance in the 2004 DOE report: new section 15:44	12-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell: format link: JzG, why no user page? 15:42	12-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Jed Rothwell: on Jed Rothwell, IP contributions, and spin. 14:50	12-01-09		User talk:Abd	cold fusion report recommendation: format 14:49	12-01-09		User talk:Abd	cold fusion report recommendation: thanks for your note, Enric. *The controversy is open,* that is obvious from recent sources. 02:02	12-01-09		Instant-runoff voting	Changes for voters: remove space 02:01	12-01-09		Instant-runoff voting	Is IRV better than other winner-take-all systems?: moved back to lead 02:00	12-01-09		Instant-runoff voting	it was a settled consensus that this belonged in the lead (debated extensively). It's wordy, but it definitely didn't belong in the section where it was moved. 01:53	12-01-09		Instant-runoff voting	IRV will eliminate some of the spoiler effect: restore this, it was improperly removed in December. 01:43	12-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence	Evidence deadline: is this about winning arguments or about seeking and finding consensus? 01:32	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	PHG is encouraged to keep working with his mentor: Support, but .... 01:29	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	PHG makes high quality contributions: he's asking for praise and he deserves it. Why not give it to him? 01:27	12-01-09		Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop	Mentor invitation: support 01:19	12-01-09		User talk:Abd/IP	add messages below this section header: reply to Fredrick day 01:09	12-01-09		User talk:DGG	Advice requested re the spam blacklist: developments 00:46	12-01-09		User talk:Abd	lenr-canr.org: LENR learner. 00:42	12-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi Abd!: good to stay out of it. Let others work it out. What, me worry? 00:18	12-01-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: add conclusion of the 2004 DOE report re further research. 23:48	11-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi abd!: ugh, saw AN today. 23:30	11-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard	GoRight community ban: arggh. 21:59	11-01-09		User talk:Abd	Account Creation Tool Confirmation: is there a record of the IP from which the request was made? 20:44	11-01-09		User talk:Abd	Hi abd!: thanks. 17:44	11-01-09		User talk:JzG	lenr-canr.org: thanks. 17:32	11-01-09		User talk:Abd	Account Creation Tool Confirmation: it wasn't me, I believe. 17:31	11-01-09		User:Abd/PHG arbitration	ArbComm erred in the original arbitration) (top) [rollback]	 18:18	10-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: add note to closed discussion	 18:15	10-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: JzG's response doesn't seem to show a reading of the letter from the webmaster.	 17:58	10-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: We can pursue whitelisting, sure, and we will, I'm sure, if the improper blacklisting isn't lifted. But why make it hard? What's the harm? 17:39	10-01-09		User talk:JzG	JzG's multiple roles: more accurate, diff'd	 17:34	10-01-09		User talk:JzG	Again on Cold Fusion: enough? 17:07	10-01-09		User talk:DGG	Advice requested re the spam blacklist: thanks, I'll see what's been up. 18:06	08-01-09		User talk:DGG	Advice requested re the spam blacklist: new section 17:46	08-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: the blacklist is not for possibly useful sites, but for clearly inappropriate ones. lenr-canr, on the face, is useful. 17:35	08-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: bottom line, Guy, you have a POV and enforced it with your tools. Please undo it. 17:26	08-01-09		User talk:JzG	JzG's multiple roles: apparently you wish to continue to discuss this directly. Fine. I suppose it might work. 05:07	08-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: please make this objection moot. 04:46	08-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: I, too, wish JzG would recognize the COI involved in his use of his admin tools to enforce his own opinion. 04:23	08-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence	Request for evidence, if it exists: some comments 01:02	07-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: objection to listing. 00:51	07-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org: sp 00:50	07-01-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lenr-canr.org 00:35	07-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: maybe something relevant to the Fringe science arbitration. 00:33	07-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: can of worms, Jehochman. Maybe I should take your Talk page off my Watchlist..... 23:57	06-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: are we done? would you consent to another administrator's removal of the listing? 23:46	06-01-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	restoring description of experiment to article: fmt 23:44	06-01-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	restoring description of experiment to article: thanks for replying, JzG. Please delist as the listing was improper. 19:47	06-01-09		User talk:JzG	Again on Cold Fusion: requested removal of lenr-canr from blacklist 19:44	06-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: date fix 19:43	06-01-09		User talk:JzG	Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: new section 19:34	06-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: some more 19:19	06-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: sign 19:13	06-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce (N)POV: There is indeed a problem here, Jehochman. Don't know if you want to get involved, but .... 18:48	06-01-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Fleischmann-Pons experiment: restoring experiment description to article 18:08	06-01-09		Martin Fleischmann	Fleischmann-Pons experiment: cut back on section, details are in main article. Could be cut further. 15:21	06-01-09		Martin Fleischmann	Fleischmann-Pons experiment: I don't see discussion on Talk. 15:20	06-01-09		Martin Fleischmann	Undid revision 259755962 by Cardamon (talk)this experiment was very important; remedy at this point is not to remove. 15:09	06-01-09		User talk:JzG	Again on Cold Fusion: comment on spam filter. 14:58	06-01-09		User talk:Jehochman	Misuse of spam filter to enforce POV: one step at a time 13:52	05-01-09		User:Abd/PHG arbitration	create 16:51	04-01-09		User talk:PHG	Your Arbcomm proceeding, a suggestion. Stop defending yourself, entirely. Let others do it, or not.: new section 15:26	04-01-09		User talk:Gwen Gale	Speedy deletion of Anthony Chinn: Good work, 03:36	03-01-09		Anthony Chinn	I'd say, leave the stub alone, appears notable. 03:23	03-01-09		User talk:Hemanshu	Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Hemanshu: It was, indeed, edit warring, quite plainly; "goals" can't be enforced without an enforcer. Who interprets the goals? 02:51	02-01-09		Rod Serling	Reverted to revision 261198701 by 151.198.128.88; unreferenced claim, found no verification. (TW) 02:35	02-01-09		User talk:Hemanshu	Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Hemanshu: It's not 2004 any more. Wikipedia grew. 21:32	01-01-09		Talk:Voting system	Comment about Bucklin removed from article.: new section)