User:Abd/2009 contributions/March

22:16	31-03-09		List of common misconceptions	Physics: don't need an in-line citation for text which is summary of an article. The source is also given if you look at the image. 21:56	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Jed Rothwell and copyvio claims: fmt 21:55	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Undid revision 280950837 by Abd (talk)no, it does belong here. 21:54	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	by Abd: actually, move this below 21:54	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: format 21:49	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: format and link blocks 21:42	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Description: hopefully, done with this section. 21:24	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": fix link 21:18	31-03-09		List of common misconceptions	Computing: oops, got the wrong date. 21:17	31-03-09		Z3 (computer)	How the Z3 relates to other work: simplify 21:15	31-03-09		Z3 (computer)	How the Z3 relates to other work: add mention of ABC 21:12	31-03-09		List of common misconceptions	Computing: clean up syntax, and we don't need to source simple facts for objects we have articles on. Presumably those articles have sources. If not, that's where the fix or tags should be! 20:49	31-03-09		List of common misconceptions	Computing: nah, don't bold that. 20:47	31-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": pressure difference across the pipe, not absolute pressure. 20:45	31-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": I learned, not physics, but how to think. 20:40	31-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": how about a little OR? 19:57	31-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Bicycle question: fix the bicycle text to remove apparent contradiction. 19:52	31-03-09		List of common misconceptions	Physics: fix per talk. 19:49	31-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Great example of a misconception. Mine.: something really great could come out of this. 17:29	31-03-09		Muon-catalyzed fusion	lousy name, neologism, unsourced, cn tag for courtesy. Very hot fusion but barely hot enough for blunt fusion is still called "cold fusion." 17:27	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": cool fusion a lousy name. 17:25	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": sp 17:24	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": work smarter, not harder. 14:55	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Coverage of Mosier-Boss paper by Wissenschaft-online: get a translation! 14:53	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: Agree in part. 02:59	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: add first efforts to resolve dispute 01:57	31-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Conflict with Jed Rothwell: add link to recent edit of Cold fusion. 01:51	31-03-09		User:Radhakrishnansk	Reverted 1 edit by 117.204.80.23 identified as vandalism to last revision by Radhakrishnansk. (TW) 01:26	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": well, that's right, actually. 01:08	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The report results suggest ...: Just in, man bites dog, Park considers LENR to be "science." 00:35	31-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The report results suggest ...: The context is crucial here. The neutrons do NOT explain cold fusion, but cold fusion might be necessary to explain why hot fusion is happening in there. 23:42	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The report results suggest ...: explain "sentence" reference. 23:39	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The report results suggest ...: I thought I took this out before. Weird database behavior last few minutes. 23:37	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	but don't explain what process was causing them.: expecting a particle physicist to have a fast and appropriate off-the-cuff comment about this is quite unrealistic. CR-39 is for low-budget phys. 19:32	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: SPAWAR work itself a confirmation of earlier work, and earlier SPAWAR work has been confirmed. The neutron finding is solid on the face. 19:18	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: RS is RS, but different forms of RS exist for different types of text. With attribution, primary sources can be RS, for example. 18:46	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CR-39 and positive and negative results.: format 18:44	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	CR-39 and positive and negative results.: new section 15:06	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	My Hunch: "Rule-bound Robot!" that would be uncivil, for sure. 15:03	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	My Hunch: not about you, A.B. 15:01	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	New material: The Iverson stuff is dicey. 14:56	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	New material: thanks, A.B. good. 14:45	30-03-09		University of Atlanta	New operation as University of Atlanta: fmt 14:44	30-03-09		University of Atlanta	History: Ah! there it is. Need to know details of organizational shift. Did Barrington change its name or were Barrington assets sold to new corporation? 14:42	30-03-09		University of Atlanta	History: set off. We need source on the change of ownership, UofA has new owners, not impeached by the former troubles. 14:38	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: fmt 14:36	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: a bit more 14:33	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: about sources and considerations and the lack of conflict in sources (i.e., true conflict is rare) 13:56	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	note that this is a draft 06:58	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: against better judgment, perhaps, but I wrote the damn thing and it's quicker to save it. 06:37	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: bold claims for someone with no quality source to back them up. 06:22	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: er, your POV is showing. I'll avert my eyes while you fix it. 06:11	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Description: fmt 06:10	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Description: remove unused reference 06:05	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Applicable policies: fmt 06:03	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: outline evidence of trying and failing. 05:53	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Description: conflict with Jed Rothwell. 05:12	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Applicable policies: no specific deletion policy found 05:09	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: fix links 05:07	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: add protected pages edited, etc. 04:24	30-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Description: finish section showing deep involvement 03:37	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: time will tell, eh? Meanwhile, we will rely on reliable source and not unverified opinions about what Mr. or Ms. Mainstream has to say. 03:12	30-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Headline: US Navy laboratory unveiled evidence of cold fusion: pull down that ugly link. Yes, article text wasn't necessary anyway. 03:08	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	New material: comparison with University of Phoenix 03:02	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	New material: I share your concern, A.B. 02:55	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	New material: I do have a problem with balance now. Way too much on old scandal. Not sure how to deal with it, except not to wax too eloquent on it. 02:36	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Someone getting to excited over this.: some newspaper stuff doesn't become Googleable. 02:34	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	My Hunch: movingtoanapartment.com? honestly ... never mind. 02:21	30-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	My Hunch: I have hunches as well. Mistro12, welcome, but please be careful. 01:36	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Great example of a misconception. Mine.: new section 01:21	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd.: Who wrote this ugly section head? 01:20	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd. 01:15	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd.: new section 00:53	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Islam: great section of the article. 00:21	30-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Request for comment on sourcing this list: okay, you rang? about standards. 21:36	29-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Navy research cold fusion reports: Late to the party, but welcome anyway. The booze is all gone (not me!) but there are some fascinating dancers. 21:21	29-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The report results suggest ...: Science Daily: "neutrons, subatomic particles that scientists view as tell-tale signs that nuclear reactions are occurring." plus blogger critique 20:42	29-03-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/JzG: ah, politics. Don't leave home without it. Big surprise, headline: "Wikipedia Community Found to Be Affected by Politics! Editors Discovered to be Human!" 20:24	29-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: Krivit isn't "criticizing" the idea that low-energy nuclear reactions are involved. 18:59	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Statement of the dispute: tweak desired outcome. 18:46	29-03-09		Cold fusion	fix link to section of article that has been renamed. 18:41	29-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion	Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: try to find consensus in the smallest possible group first, then expand if needed. 18:27	29-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion	Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: experts are particularly vulnerable to indef block. 18:11	29-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion	Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: sure, vandal-only accounts. But "indef blocked" doesn't equal "vandal." 18:05	29-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion	Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: please do stop it, I've seen some bad examples. 15:23	29-03-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/JzG: sp etc. 15:20	29-03-09		User talk:Abd	User:Abd/JzG: RfC drafted at User:Abd/JzG/RfC 14:34	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: add edit summaries 13:49	29-03-09		Cold fusion	Incompatibilities with conventional physics: actually, there are explanations, including ones that allegedly use conventional theory. So this is more neutral. 06:44	29-03-09		User talk:Abd	30 days for rfc have passed 06:41	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Applicable policies: add policy references 06:30	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Powers misused: add known blocks 06:14	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	remove notes 06:13	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	template the regular 06:12	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	Statement of the dispute: start it. 03:39	29-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	subst 23:50	28-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: this is an encyclopedia, not an article in a tabloid. 17:45	28-03-09		Template:RfC3	Powers misused: format 17:45	28-03-09		Template:RfC3	Powers misused: add additional privilege not listed with template RfC but requiring admin bit. 17:43	28-03-09		Requests for comment/JzG 3	start page with template 16:59	28-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: replace badly redundant sentence with a simple one saying the same thing. 16:57	28-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: correct captions. The single pits are from prior experiments, not the neutron work. Unless I missed something. 16:49	28-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: re wikilinking CR-39 16:34	28-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	cold fusion cell: media source vs. peer-reviewed reliable source? 13:50	28-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: yes, see Krivit's comments. They *assume* that the authors provided an explanation he considered premature. 13:42	28-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: *of course* the articles use "cold fusion," this is journalists interpreting the results in terms of a popular concept. 13:17	28-03-09		Articles for deletion/Hot stain	Keep or Merge 12:56	28-03-09		Hot stain	#NAME? 12:53	28-03-09		User talk:Skipsievert	Hot stain: one or two really doesn't make much difference in the long run. 03:40	28-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: wikify CR-39, replace redundant text re neutrons, remove Krivit remark as not needed here (LENR covers it), 03:24	28-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: detailed discussion of some problems with the section 21:33	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: agree it's possible, though maybe a long shot. 21:23	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	About those missing gamma rays, a question.: we definitely need to work on the theory sections. 16:25	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Coverage of Mosier-Boss paper by Wissenschaft-online: new section 15:59	27-03-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Guidelines for this article.: new section 15:42	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: rm unneeded outdent 15:41	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: agree with Coppertwig and V	 15:16	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": at some point the boulder and gravity win. Unless we can have fun pushing it up the hill. 15:10	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Anachronism: better title, I hope. 15:07	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Anachronism: we can count publications in Talk, and we can create list articles. 14:49	27-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: The heat is the fundamental scientific question and, in fact, the fundamental funding question, which was the charge of the panel. 14:47	27-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: MIndreading, still, but attributed to mind-reader, which is much better. In the end, though, claims without examples won't cut it. Not being verified is BS. 14:42	27-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: That wired article gives very little attention to the topic and yet is somehow able to mind-read motivations. A better source would be fine, one aware of the extensive work. 14:38	27-03-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: This section is still radically imbalanced toward skepticism. There are many proposed explanations, and only the vaguest is mentioned here, "Condensed matter." 11:22	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: can't win for losing 04:24	27-03-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected_User:Fredrick_day_sock 04:22	27-03-09		User talk:Abd	Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected_User:Fredrick_day_sock: I'd conclude it was likely FD in spite of the checkuser report. 04:03	27-03-09		User talk:Abd	Naturwissenschaften: try to keep what you can from another editor's edits. 04:01	27-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: why not call a spade a spade, instead of "tool." 03:37	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	About those missing gamma rays, a question.: new section 03:27	27-03-09		Cold fusion	3.- Conversion of ?-rays to heat: simplify and fix. 03:24	27-03-09		Cold fusion	Excess heat observations: sp 03:23	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: and it just is not notable that the authors of a paper describe it as very significant. Get a neutral and notable comment, please. 03:22	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: trying to fix the link, ran into edit conflict with the bot. but at least there is this capitalization error. 03:09	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: let's be a little specific, guys, and please don't call this a "criticism." He's supporting their work. NS seems to have misunderstood his comments. 03:07	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: The criticism is attributed, but, bottom line, this is traced to one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper. 03:05	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: remove remark about CR-39 being taken seriously as not supported by source. Please be careful about synthesis. 03:00	27-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: It's not a life-sciences journal. It's reliable source because it's peer-reviewed, but we don't preface sources with "reliable source," either. 02:55	27-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Additions to "further developments": about the sequence of edits here and the "oh good god" response. 00:31	27-03-09		User talk:Abd	Naturwissenschaften: look, they are *explicitly* a "multidisciplinary science journal covering all aspects of the natural sciences" 23:41	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: restore my edit unchopped up. 23:31	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: if someone thinks collapse is better, they are free to try it. I'm not going to get exercised about it. It's not against the MOS, as far as I could find. 23:15	26-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: format 23:14	26-03-09		User talk:Abd	30 days for rfc have passed: thanks, Enric 23:09	26-03-09		User talk:Abd	Thanks: no problem, and congratulations on the swift recovery. 20:06	26-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: we have stuffed many topics into one article, that's one reason why consensus has been difficult. 18:47	26-03-09		User talk:Abd	using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article 18:26	26-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Blacklisted website: general comment on whitelisting 17:02	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: maybe. 15:39	26-03-09		Talk:Binyam Mohamed	US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: not news 15:38	26-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Hatnotes: careful. 15:32	26-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Blacklisted website: why it was relisted, and why the link should stay active. 15:14	26-03-09		University of Atlanta	Undid revision 279807249 by A. B. (talk)I agree that we don't need "defunct." 15:05	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": the blind men and the elephant. Why can't they get their reports to confirm each other? 14:55	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: on WP:NOTAFORUM and the implications. 14:41	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion discussion: I'm not you, Phil. If I were, I'd be redundant and unnecessary. 14:31	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Anachronism: I agree. Let's compile a list. 14:20	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Die Naturwissenschaften isn't properly described as a "Life Sciences" journal.: new section 14:02	26-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: Naturwissenschaften isn't a "life sciences journal." Simplify, wikify notable topics, add significant detail. 13:22	26-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: it's not a criticism of the findings. Been saying for some time, the field is LENR, not "cold fusion." NET is notable, needs article. 01:47	26-03-09		Talk:TurnKey Linux	RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: sources need not be in English. 01:37	26-03-09		Talk:Binyam Mohamed	US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: just a couple of sources. 01:24	26-03-09		Talk:Binyam Mohamed	US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: not based just on that source, which is adequate to confirm notability, but doesn't seem reliable, because of polemic. 01:13	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": it is mentioned in the body of the article. 00:54	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: the proof is in the pudding. 00:47	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": interesting. Yes, CF isn't at all like this. 00:18	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Variations on "pathological science": a little late to the party, II, but welcome. 00:08	26-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: a certain level of OR and SYNTH is not only permitted on Talk, it may be a very good thing. The guidelines regulate article content. 17:38	25-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Should readers be given a link to the paper where they can read it?: no opinion expressed to the contrary 17:34	25-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Links to lenr-canr.org were allegedly linkspammed: I shoulda signed this 17:33	25-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly alters documents: link acceptable with "unverified tag" until verified or found to be altered. 17:27	25-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly is a fringe web site or biased: collapse discussion, state proposed consensus believed clear. Revert if not and discuss. 17:10	25-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: reply to V. 16:32	25-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: Thanks, Fred, good luck. 15:33	25-03-09		User talk:Sarcasticidealist	You will be missed.: new section 14:27	25-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: how can a 2005 source cover response to conferences held in 2006 and 2007? 14:24	25-03-09		Cold fusion	2009 reports: remove peacock, significance is obvious; remove "lack of mainstream acceptance," not found in source, synthesis. 14:15	25-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: where we are going. 02:49	25-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: more on the New Scientist piece. 02:47	25-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: new section 01:35	25-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: the Guardian writer explained what he was about. 21:47	24-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA section #1356234 ..: Thanks, Beetstra. 21:37	24-03-09		User talk:Abd	File copyright problem with File:Triple tracks in CR-39.jpg: Well, I did what I could. I'd hope, in fact, for more assistance and less "warning," but I'm sure you are busy. 20:25	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: consensus process. 19:44	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: rm extra, punct 19:41	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: we use "reliable media sources" with caution, for good reason, when it comes to science. There are actually all kinds of problems with them. 19:08	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: sign it 19:05	24-03-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 279415298 by Neurolysis (talk)hopefully, I've taken care of it. 19:02	24-03-09			image was released without restrictions.) (top) [rollback]	 18:36	24-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: move image up, looks better	 18:34	24-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: add image of "triple tracks from SPAWAR group.	 18:24	24-03-09		User talk:Aappe	General note: Vandalism on Template:Commonspar. (TW)) (top	 18:23	24-03-09		Template:Commonspar	Reverted edits by Aappe (talk) to last version by Netoholic) (top) [rollback]	 18:09	24-03-09			From American Chemical Society press release, Caption: An experimental "cold fusion" device produced this pattern of "triple tracks" (shown at right), which scientists say is caused by high 18:00	24-03-09		Cold fusion	Further developments: well, this *is* a development.... This was widely reported in reliable source, but this info is from the ACS press release. 17:16	24-03-09		Cold fusion	See also: external link to videos from press conference at ACS meeting yesterday. 14:43	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: sign it 14:42	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice: about the Wired report. *very* old news, nothing about yesterday's announcement or recent work. 14:34	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: no consensus for current version, but it may be adequate for now, as long as it's not rigid. It has no special status, given the history. 14:20	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: on the news. 04:20	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: not live 04:07	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: live video or audio? 03:57	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: the stories are being largely taken from an alleged ACS press release. Is it? Probably. But that should be confirmed. 03:53	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: Techradar news. group of researchers reporting "compelling new evidence" 03:34	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: EE Times "Cold fusion experimentally confirmed." 03:23	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: sign it. 03:22	24-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: my, my, my. How can I assist? 02:40	24-03-09		User talk:Pcarbonn	Congratulations, seriously!: it would be nice to have a link! 02:39	24-03-09		User talk:Pcarbonn	AfD nomination of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: article was userfied. 02:33	24-03-09		User talk:Pcarbonn	Violating the ArbCom ruling: preposterous. 23:14	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: lost cause? My sympathies? 23:07	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: share the wealth 23:05	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Media notice.: new section 22:55	23-03-09		Martin Fleischmann	References: replace dead link with archive copy 22:46	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	BBC News article on ACS cold fusion session.: What unrealistic assumptions are made in the theory paper mentioned above this section? 22:32	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: what's this about? 22:20	23-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: more 22:15	23-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: weird stuff. 22:14	23-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: could be Fred. Weird stuff with that IP, which is indeed Fred. What connects it to the newly registered editor? 21:32	23-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: hmmm. so we know the IP editor is probably Fred, which says nothing about the registered editor. 21:22	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	BBC News article on ACS cold fusion session.: new section 20:02	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: thanks for the citation, Guy. 17:05	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: a bit more 16:53	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: ditto 16:53	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: fix CR-LF to space. 16:51	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: link to guideline 16:48	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: new section 16:44	23-03-09		User talk:Carcharoth	Your suggestion for a working group: suggestion for how to do it. 16:18	23-03-09		User talk:Abd/Open Source notability	RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: how to proceed. 16:17	23-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Semiprotection.: new section 15:37	23-03-09		User talk:Abd/Open Source notability	RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: sign, move LS response to after my complete response.. 15:34	23-03-09		User talk:Skipsievert	Energy accounting: thanks for your response, Skip, it bodes well. 13:38	23-03-09		User talk:Abd	New Page Patrol: Thanks. 13:37	23-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: format for clarity. respond. It's not "us" vs. "them," it's just "us." 02:32	23-03-09		Martin Fleischmann	Life and career: Half the reviewers in the 2004 DOE report considered the evidence for the F-P effect to be "compelling." 02:23	23-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Link was allegedly inserted by JedRothwell, alleged POV-pusher and COI: fix link 02:20	23-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: address the policy issues more specifically. 02:00	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: fmt 01:58	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: go ahead, have fun. 01:33	23-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Muon-catalysed fusion: hmmpth. 00:54	23-03-09		University of Atlanta	remove paren 00:45	23-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: fmt 00:41	23-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: On copyright policy and the value of providing convenience links. 23:57	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Guidelines: here it is, the convenience link section. 23:48	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Specific opinions: Don't think this subsection is needed at this point. 23:47	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Guidelines: I think there is one more specifically about convenience links. 23:20	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Policies: add WP:COPYVIO though it actually does not apply here because copyrighted content is not being used here. 23:03	22-03-09		User talk:Abd/Open Source notability	RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: welcome, John. 22:55	22-03-09		User talk:Abd/Open Source notability	RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: request for specifics. extended discussion in collapse box. 22:46	22-03-09		User talk:Skipsievert	Energy accounting: new section 22:34	22-03-09		User:Abd/Rule 0	fix link) (top) [rollback]	 22:33	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: Thanks.	 21:51	22-03-09		Talk:TurnKey Linux	RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: refactor. Please don't break up other's comments by interspersal.	 21:46	22-03-09		Talk:IPhone	Rfc: Should this content be included?: the RfC was a result of an RfC tag being dropped on an existing tendentious discussion. Mess. Please don't do that!	 21:27	22-03-09		Talk:IPhone	Rfc: Should this content be included?: Close without prejudice. Here, guys, is a wikitrout. You may slap each other with it, but, please, be nice. Then cook it and share it. 20:42	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: Yes, I knew that, suggest re-reading. Then I ramble on about how I've survived becoming a Wikiepedia editor, so far. 18:23	22-03-09		Rachel Maddow	restore "liberal" with source. Besides, I used to live in Cummington. "Progressive" might be a better word, though. No objection to that. I'd go for what she prefers. 18:03	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: always provide opposing editors with a face-saving escape, if possible. Fail to do this with a raccoon, you can end up torn to shreds. 17:52	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: always userfy before going to DRV. Political error here was userification in Liraz Siri space and by him. 17:25	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: better here, I decided. 17:22	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: This might be worth reading. How to tolerate the status quo and thus be able to improve it. 16:33	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Accusation of incivility: sign it with original edit date 15:35	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: Meta discussion 14:53	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: add names of thread originators or closers. 14:48	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist discussion 14:01	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Prior discussion: MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist including letter from Jed Rothwell. 13:35	22-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: Thanks, Jaybdb, indeed, thank you very much. Open sections for evidence. 13:13	22-03-09		Shona language	remove reference to top-level web page, no reference to Shona. (probable lower page somewhere!), add cn tag 13:09	22-03-09		Shona language	I don't think this is controversial, though it would be better with a source. Change "official" to principal, note official language is English. 13:07	22-03-09		Zimbabwe	Demographics: this seems not to be controversial. 06:10	22-03-09		User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley	Problems with this article's return to article space: good advice, don't ignore it, I suggest 06:06	22-03-09		User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley	Problems with this article's return to article space: find reliable source, fine. Not, not. 05:57	22-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Banning policy	Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: what, specifically to refactor? 05:55	22-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Banning policy	Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: even though he's mentioned as an example, this isn't about SA. 05:35	22-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Muon-catalysed fusion: how muon-catalyzed fusion came to be considered a different thing than cold fusion. Political. And about practical usage for energy. 05:02	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Undid revision 278884980 by Abd (talk)I'd already qualified it.... 05:00	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: actually, I've been khatib a number of other times 04:59	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: fmt 04:58	22-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: no evidence of involvement. 22:50	21-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: link, format 22:47	21-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: why it's not reasonable to suspect copyright violation here, and this has been consensus in a number of places. 21:46	21-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Muon-catalysed fusion: issues 21:12	21-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: about one of the sources. 20:50	21-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: where I'm going from here. 20:46	21-03-09		User talk:Abd/Cold fusion	open up talk page for draft) (top 20:35	21-03-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion	Start draft of complete coverage of topic per sources satisfying WP:V 17:45	21-03-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 278475635 by 12.165.54.220 (talk)thermal energy is "excess heat" 17:38	21-03-09		Talk:Association of British Drivers	WP:FRINGE: using the web site of an organization as a supporting source.) (top) [rollback]	 13:37	21-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: please understand the context.	 13:31	21-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: extensive examination of the instant case, but start with general considerations	 00:41	21-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	add sig for Enric Naval	 00:38	21-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons effect: yes, there are usable sources. 00:34	21-03-09		User talk:Abd	Accusation of incivility: I did respond on the Talk page, you didn't mention that. 00:29	21-03-09		User talk:Abd	Accusation of incivility: If Shanahan has a problem, definitely, I'll address it as requested. I'm certainly not going to fill up Talk:Cold fusion with research on his behavior. 21:42	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Request feedback on article: I will when I can. Maybe even tonight. 21:37	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Mail: gotcha 21:35	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Suciindia: yeah. 20:39	20-03-09		User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	restore blind categories, retain userpage template 20:38	20-03-09		User talk:Stepheng3	your suggestion on User talk:Abd: blank it, not necessary. 20:37	20-03-09		User talk:Stepheng3	your suggestion on User talk:Abd: never mind. 20:33	20-03-09		User talk:Stepheng3	your suggestion on User talk:Abd: new section 20:30	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Suciindia: Thanks. Is there anything I need to do now? 17:17	20-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons effect: minor 17:12	20-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons effect: a Bad Science study. 15:56	20-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: Shanahan, as an expert and professional, would be, I assume, quite pleased to find conclusive evidence for LENR. 15:33	20-03-09		Talk:TurnKey Linux	RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: review the DRV. 15:22	20-03-09		Talk:TurnKey Linux	About the blanking of this page.: new section 15:13	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: personal reply. 14:59	20-03-09		User talk:Abd	Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: shouldn't be automatic, but only issue at DRV for a speedy should be the speedy criteria. 03:12	20-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons effect: format 03:09	20-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons effect: new section 22:41	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: article published in Accountability in Research. 22:29	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: paper on need for Q.E.D. in a condensed matter system, not apparently related to Cold fusion. 22:15	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: further, clearer description of this by Fleischmann (2003) 18:46	19-03-09		Plurality voting system	Undid revision 278354380 by 58.69.28.124 (talk)sorry, this is incoherent. 18:42	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: compare the papers. The 1989 paper gives one sentence on the background, the 2002 paper discusses it at length. 18:29	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: looks like we are going to need some careful consideration. 18:17	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: more of the history 17:50	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: about my edit restoring the thinking that led up to the experiment, as reported by Fleischmann. 17:41	19-03-09		Cold fusion	attribute source for reminiscence; appropriate here because it provides context. What were they doing, and why, when they found the F-P effect? 17:34	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: I'll incorporate one of Noren's concerns. 17:14	19-03-09		User talk:Abd	Accusation of incivility: I responded there. But, really, why this request from Noren? 17:11	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: respond to Kirk as requested on my Talk by Noren. 16:46	19-03-09		User talk:Abd	Your edit-summary at : sure. how? 03:00	19-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: refs in bibliography with no link, hosted on lenr-canr.org 02:26	19-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Transparent 02:25	19-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Transparent: new section 01:14	19-03-09		Martin Fleischmann	Conference proceedings: edit per suggestion by Arthur Rubin, see Talk. 01:13	19-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	disputed reprint designation: unverified is fine, actually. 01:10	19-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	disputed reprint designation: jeez... louise. 00:59	19-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Overall Conclusion: full comment on !vote. 00:46	19-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Overall Conclusion: fix error before response 00:32	19-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Overall Conclusion: "reasons given"? Where? 00:19	19-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Banning policy	Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: okay, a situation where the banned editor wouldn't self-revert in spite of intention to do so. 00:07	19-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Banning policy	Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: kumbaya 23:36	18-03-09		User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley	collegial collaboration that complies with the community consensus: the article will be bulletproof by the time we are done. The time may depend on the learning speed of an editor. 23:23	18-03-09		User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley	to do: the problems with the article, where to go. 22:46	18-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: here is why not right away. 22:33	18-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Ad hominem comments: hoping for the best. 22:21	18-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: thanks, Coppertwig. 22:14	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Example of the hysteria in 1989: wrong word 22:13	18-03-09		User talk:Jayvdb/Archive 7	About your permission for fringe-science-banned editor to edit N ray: Thanks, Jayvdb. 21:57	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: see also the discussion in Talk:Martin Fleischmann 21:46	18-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Status of link in article after this discussion: it's all in history. 20:34	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: appearance of wikilawyering? just pointing it out.... 20:29	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: this is an exception to the general guidelines about conference proceedings; notable expert writing about his own process. 20:18	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: respond to Shanahan in some detail. 19:33	18-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	How I use my time is my decision. How you use yours is yours.: new section 19:03	18-03-09		Cold fusion	Fleischmann-Pons announcement: don't make the reader stand on his or her head! 19:00	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: relevance of the source, it's now being used as a reference, though it was always useful for background. 18:52	18-03-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: get that ref right? 18:50	18-03-09		Cold fusion	add consideration of quantum electrodynamics. Many sources on this refer to the theoretical issue, and the reference is explicit. 18:37	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Fleischmann 2002 reference: why I'm reverting the reference back in pending consensus. 18:23	18-03-09		User talk:THF	Please explain.: action intended to protect the project is never "bad." 18:14	18-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: not quite ready for prime time. 17:32	18-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Example of the hysteria in 1989: Problem is not lack of foundation, problem is that the foundation is other than the scientific method. 17:20	18-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Hmmm.... conversation through edit summary. I suppose it might save some time.: new section 17:04	18-03-09		Instant-runoff voting	Non-governmental organizations: It was shown that the bylaws did change. My view is that the unused bylaw isn't notable, but this is a compromise. 16:46	18-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA section #1356234 ..: clarify. 16:44	18-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA section #1356234 ..: how a more structured, independent, whitelist process could make it easier for blacklist volunteers, and reflect broader consensus. 14:45	18-03-09		User talk:Abd	/AGF, but also stop those evil spammers, fangs dripping with the blood of innocent readers. 03:43	18-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Banning policy	Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: new section 03:25	18-03-09		User talk:Abd	Haseldine: I understand. However, agreeing with people when they are right is an important technique in restoring civility when it has broken down. 03:14	18-03-09		User talk:THF	Please explain.: I don't think the redirect was broken. 03:12	18-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	Undid revision 278024770 by Abd (talk) 03:11	18-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	test 03:09	18-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox 03:09	18-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	test 03:07	18-03-09		User talk:THF	Please explain.: I would have sworn that I tried it. Goes to show about swearing. 02:45	18-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12	Gene Ray: lack of independent notability is really an argument for Merge, not Delete. 02:41	18-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12	Gene Ray: BLP is a red herring here. BLP refers to content of articles, not to articles. Topic notable, article, Q.E.D. 02:29	18-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11	Yvonne Bradley: add "closed" to section header 02:29	18-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11	Randy Rasputin Richards: add "closed" to section header 02:20	18-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11	Randy Rasputin Richards: close as keep deleted. stubbed draft may be reconsidered. 01:57	18-03-09		Talk:Yvonne Bradley	redirect Talk here to userfied page talk. 01:54	18-03-09		User talk:THF	Please explain.: fmt 01:53	18-03-09		User talk:THF	Please explain.: new section 01:46	18-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley 01:36	18-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: note that report was archived as withdrawn by reporter. good move. 01:33	18-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: maybe this will fix it. 01:31	18-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	something weird going on here; in any case this archive template should go below the section title. 01:19	18-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: fmt 22:53	17-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: comment, negative and positive. 22:44	17-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: PJH, stop it! 22:34	17-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Ad hominem comments: by the way, technically.... but it was still uncivil without any necessity. 22:30	17-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Ad hominem comments: please reconsider, Socrates2008. 22:17	17-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley: new section 22:10	17-03-09		Yvonne Bradley	don't know any other way to test this.... will revert if it is a problem. Show permanent link to page history as of merge. 22:01	17-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	Closure of the Yvonne Bradley DRV as endorsed without prejudice.: new section 21:56	17-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Closure of the Yvonne Bradley DRV as endorsed without prejudice.: new section 21:50	17-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11	Yvonne Bradley: close as endorsement without prejudice. Non-admin closure. 21:37	17-03-09		Binyam Mohamed	Allegations of MI5 'collusion': wikify 21:35	17-03-09		Binyam Mohamed	Release: wikify 21:28	17-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Ad hominem comments: take the warning seriously. On the other hand.... 19:18	17-03-09		User talk:Shamirhirani	Your edits: agree with Beetstra. 19:11	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Example of the hysteria in 1989: new section 18:31	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: get the name right! 18:30	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Thermochimica Acta: I may have made this mistake elsewhere, too. 18:30	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Thermochimica Acta: restoration done. 18:27	17-03-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: restore references removed without discussion 18:17	17-03-09		Cold fusion	Evidence for nuclear transmutations: restore ref removed without discussion 18:16	17-03-09		Cold fusion	Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: restore ref remove in January without discussion 18:13	17-03-09		Cold fusion	Excess heat observations: fix refs mangled in January 18:06	17-03-09		Cold fusion	Experimental Details: restore ref removed without discussion in January 18:02	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Thermochimica Acta: No, this isn't about Thermochemica Acta, it's about one editor. 17:55	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Review of sources: a little more on Grimshaw. 17:50	17-03-09		Pan Am Flight 103	Undid revision 277842060 by PJHaseldine (talk)edit verified 17:41	17-03-09		Cold Fusion (disambiguation)	many other books have "Cold fusion" in the title, why this one? 17:39	17-03-09		Cold Fusion (disambiguation)	move Muon-catalyzed fusion up with other physics usages. 17:35	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: collapse section with report of action taken. 17:16	17-03-09		User talk:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	about this page.) (top 17:07	17-03-09		User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	remove reference to DOE report, which is not relevant here, though specific reference to calorimetry issues in that report would be. 17:06	17-03-09		User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	qualify, calorimetry isn't imporant in all cold fusion experiments. 17:03	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Yes, being considered a pariah field has damaged it. 16:48	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Sure. Let's do it, but we need reliable source. 16:26	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: the section definitely can use work. 15:33	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": Not interested in "debate." Discussion here is properly aiming for consensus, not for one side or another to win. 15:28	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": Shanahan's work could be perfectly correct, but only addresses a narrow possibility. 14:57	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": too much detail for this article, to be sure. However, let's work on the Calorimetry article. 14:25	17-03-09		User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments	This is better. I missed those categories, it's correct that this page should not show up in them. 14:22	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Review of sources: a review of Grimshaw shows the problem, inertia based on limited personal experience. 14:00	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Review of sources: new section 13:44	17-03-09		Cold Fusion (disambiguation)	add additional usage found in peer-reviewed papers on nucleosynthesis. 00:59	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: yes, this is the place, and this is why. 00:24	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: sp 00:22	17-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: detail on the experiment from New Energy Times. Worth looking at. 22:36	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": Thanks, Verbal. Come to think of it, User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments. 22:15	16-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: how to win friends and influence people. Assume they are right, but accomplish your purpose without confrontation. 20:44	16-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion talk: Thanks, Verbal, welcome to my Talk. 20:41	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Clarity of article, etc.: point to response and statement of intention 20:34	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": let's start this over. Will Dr. Shanahan please explain his work, and will others help him do this? 20:24	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "calibration constant shift": collapse argument not adequately focused on discovering explanation of Shanahan's work 20:21	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 277714605 by Abd (talk)rv self to accomodate Verbal's opinion 20:20	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	add comment about intentions, will revert immediately. 20:02	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: why OTRS? 19:55	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "constant calibration shift": change section title per Shanahan comment. 19:52	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Editors are reminded of civility rules and the purpose of thispage.: new section 19:35	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	On "constant calibration shift": an edit conflict stopped this from going through earlier. 18:08	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Major lead problems: refactor this discussion to its own section, it is not about the lead. V, can you pipe down a bit with the rhetoric? 18:06	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: What did you read, Kirk? Translation? 14:17	16-03-09		Pathological science	qualify that CF is alleged to be pathological science, but that this remains controversial, there is ongoing research reported in RS. 14:14	16-03-09		N ray	See also: Polywater is not related to N-rays, but both are discussed under Pathological science 14:04	16-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Thanks for responding: new section 13:57	16-03-09		Talk:Distance Education and Training Council	Article Needs Less Opinion, More Citation: Lambert analysis seems fairly accurate to me. 13:33	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Major lead problems: CF is a hypothesis to explain an experimental result, the Fleischmann effect. 13:12	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: about this. 02:36	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: wikify Tsinghua University instead of whole publisher name. 02:35	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: hey, notify the copyright holder! What a great idea! 02:24	16-03-09		Martin Fleischmann	remove missing reference pending fix. 02:22	16-03-09		Martin Fleischmann	Conference proceedings: uncomment link to convenience copy of paper. 02:20	16-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Overall Conclusion: propose overall conclusion in spite of incomplete preliminary discussion. 02:10	16-03-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: add convenience link to Fleischmann paper published by Tsinghua University Press in China. 02:09	16-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: here is why not agree. How long will it take to get a copy of the book published in China? 01:46	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.253.110	I don't think this belongs here) (top) [rollback]	 01:43	16-03-09		User:59.91.253.112	create with ssp tag for Kuntan) (top	 01:42	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.253.112	move ssp tag to user page) (top) [rollback] 01:41	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.253.113	sock tag on user page) (top) [rollback]	 01:39	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.253.27	ssp tag on user page) (top) [rollback] 01:16	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.253.110	ssp tag is on user page. 01:12	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.254.63	remove SSP tage, it's on the user page) (top) [rollback]	 01:11	16-03-09		User talk:59.91.254.3	remove SSP tag -- it's on the user page.) (top) [rollback] 01:01	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: discuss those pages, etc. 00:53	16-03-09			hopefully, this isn't too much of a mess! 00:50	16-03-09			correct link 00:47	16-03-09			get that user link in there! 00:46	16-03-09			checkuser link. 00:45	16-03-09			uh, wikifiy that! 00:44	16-03-09			get rid of redlink. 00:39	16-03-09		User:192.87.16.244	tag as SSP of Suciindia) (top) [rollback]	 00:38	16-03-09		User:192.87.16.130	add ssp tag) (top) [rollback] 00:35	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: what was the connection with User:Kuntan? 00:32	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: fmt 00:32	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: copy reply from my Talk. 00:30	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: please respond in place. thanks. 00:26	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: continue 00:24	16-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: stop now! 00:23	16-03-09		User talk:Abd	Edits by Kuntan 00:20	16-03-09			fmt 00:20	16-03-09			create ssp category page 00:18	16-03-09			create ssp category page 00:07	16-03-09		User:Sekhar Lukose Kuriakose	may have been placed by banned user, but is accurate. Not that it matters a lot!) (top) [rollback]	 23:59	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: what attracted you to this page?	 23:53	15-03-09		User talk:192.87.16.130	remove drive-by ssp allegation by SPA.) (top) [rollback] 23:47	15-03-09		User:Sekhar Lukose Kuriakose	Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G5). (TW) 23:44	15-03-09		User talk:192.87.16.244	User page created by suspected sock of User:Kuntan: remove section, ITC is a school. IP behaves as if fixed for a specific user.) (top) [rollback]	 23:43	15-03-09		User:192.87.16.244	It's a school, remove speedy template	 23:39	15-03-09		User talk:192.87.16.244	User page created by suspected sock of User:Kuntan: new section	 23:39	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	WP:SPI: be careful, R.	 23:26	15-03-09		User:192.87.16.244	Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G5). (TW)	 23:10	15-03-09		User talk:192.87.16.244	remove sock template added by SPA 22:46	15-03-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	m-monroe.org: win some, lose some 22:40	15-03-09		User talk:Abd	SUCI Page regarding: well, watch out for "uncivilised." That's a uncivil comment. He's banned, that should be the end of the topic.... 22:09	15-03-09		User talk:Orangemarlin	March 2009: mood-altering drugs. If OM can't manage his reactions, maybe he *should* take them. 22:05	15-03-09		User talk:Orangemarlin	March 2009: Civility does, in fact, "trump" NPOV, but only because civility is a precondition for the assessment of NPOV. 21:50	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	WP:SPI: SPI a waste of time. 21:45	15-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12	Gene Ray: editor probably never saw Stifle's question. 21:42	15-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12	Gene Ray: Overturn. 21:33	15-03-09		Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12	Gene Ray: Stifle comment clearly based on irrelevant issue, !vote should be disregarded. 21:18	15-03-09		Articles for deletion/Gevork Nazaryan	Gevork Nazaryan: Delete, inadequate notability asserted. 21:08	15-03-09		User talk:Phil153	Gevork Nazaryan: add editor's user links an edit time. 21:02	15-03-09		User talk:Phil153	Gevork Nazaryan: assist editor by creating section 20:59	15-03-09		User talk:Phil153	Thanks!: I saw your efforts on User talk:Orangemarlin, good work. 20:33	15-03-09		User talk:BellahBluesky	AfD nomination of Krier (LRDF): about editing the article with your plea for the article to be kept, and ... good luck with your writing.) (top) [rollback]	 20:30	15-03-09		User talk:BellahBluesky	notice re AfD for Krier (LRDF)	 20:22	15-03-09		Articles for deletion/Krier (LRDF)	Delete. Will properly notify author.	 19:51	15-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Have a nice day, and keep it that way.: new section	 19:31	15-03-09		User talk:EdJohnston	Proposed wording for proposed restrictions on PJHaseldine: all bans are temporary, so duration is mostly moot. It may actually be easier to reverse an unspecified ban than a specific one. 19:16	15-03-09		User talk:Abd	SUCI Page regarding: continue advice on how to deal with banned editor, and message for Kuntan. 19:13	15-03-09		User talk:Abd/IP	sign introduction for effective revision date. 19:12	15-03-09		User talk:Abd/IP	clarify request re reasonable IP edits here. 16:18	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: more complicated than asserted. AN/I wrong venue to resolve this. 16:08	15-03-09		User talk:Hapsala	WP:LINKVIO: add a little 16:07	15-03-09		User talk:Hapsala	WP:LINKVIO: be careful about edit warring to assert content, follow WP:DR. 15:58	15-03-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	m-monroe.org: the editor should be encouraged to seek specific page local whitelisting or site local whitelisting as appropriate, if that can't be done, delisting attempt would be futile 15:14	15-03-09		User talk:Abd	SUCI Page regarding: of course WMC is an admin, a notable one, in fact, mentioned in RS. 15:11	15-03-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	lyricstranslations.com: insufficient evidence to justify blacklisting 15:02	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: there wasn't prior discussion on Hapsala talk. 14:53	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: what *specific* violations are claimed? Not shown here. 14:20	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: close this, further discussion not needed. disagree? revert me, please. 14:16	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: fmt, sp 14:15	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: please don't report this IP here, just deal with it, get individual help. 13:52	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Edit warring: fmt 13:51	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	Edit warring: this wasn't a content dispute, this was disruption by a banned editor, User:Kuntan 13:29	15-03-09		User talk:Abd	SUCI Page regarding: yes, you may revert edits clearly from this banned editor. 05:48	15-03-09		Talk:N ray	See-Also to Cold fusion: about removing the see-also again. 05:42	15-03-09		N ray	See also: Apples and Oranges appear in lists of Fruit and many sources mention them together. Should Apple have a see-also to Orange? 05:38	15-03-09		User talk:Peter Damian	Your question about the block of SA: new section 04:26	15-03-09		Talk:Socialist Unity Centre of India	Vanadalism by a Puppet of Banned User:Kuntan: fix section title, note re IP editor as banned User:Kuntan 04:15	15-03-09		Talk:Socialist Unity Centre of India	Sarat Chandra is part of the ideology: remove uncivil debate with banned editor. R, you may restore this if you wish, but I advise against it. 04:11	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: IP editor acknowledged being banned. 03:57	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring	59.91.253.113 reported by Radhakrishnansk(Result: 24h): sheesh. fix link 03:54	15-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring	59.91.253.113 reported by Radhakrishnansk(Result: 24h): RFCU is unnecessary. 03:42	15-03-09		User talk:Radhakrishnansk	remove edits by banned User:Kuntan (Radhakrishnansk may restore if he wishes, of course.) 03:37	15-03-09		User talk:William M. Connolley	Undid revision 277317841 by 59.91.253.172 (talk)Banned User:Kuntan 03:02	15-03-09		Patrick Haseldine	Guardian letter: sp 02:46	15-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: fix link 02:36	15-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: Calls for your blood? Thicken thy skin, admin! 02:10	15-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Yvonne Bradley: fmt 01:58	15-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: collapse discussion that became flame war 22:48	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Yvonne Bradley: what's your goal? PJH? 22:25	14-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: actually, there could be a very simple solution, if you are prepared to take the step. Your call, of course. 22:09	14-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: oops! didn't mean to archive the whole damn page! 22:06	14-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: close the whole thing, editor topic banned, any other issues, this is now the wrong forum 21:57	14-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Conspiracy theorist: Resolved: wrong forum. 21:52	14-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Proposed restrictions on Socrates2008 and Deon Steyn: resolved, no action. 21:45	14-03-09		User talk:Fritzpoll	The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: new section 21:21	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Yvonne Bradley: more on this. 21:00	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Topic-banned: more comment on the situation, especially on the DRV you filed. 17:14	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Topic-banned: complete sig 16:52	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Topic-banned: clarify 16:51	14-03-09		User talk:PJHaseldine	Topic-banned: advice on how to survive the topic ban, making your position and your cooperation with the community stronger. 16:11	14-03-09		User talk:Abd	Edit ban on User:PJHaseldine: Thanks for asking, PJH. I'll look into it. Comment on SPA/COI and experts and how we treat experts. 17:56	13-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Condensed matter nuclear science 17:46	13-03-09		Talk:Instant-runoff voting	American Chemical Society Elections: don't edit the article, Rob, unless it is clearly not controversial. 17:22	13-03-09		User talk:Jayvdb/Archive 7	Abour your permission for fringe-science-banned editor to edit N ray: new section 16:49	13-03-09		User:Synergy/Durova	arggh, never did figure out how to keep numbering working with subcomments. 16:48	13-03-09		User:Synergy/Durova	explain opposition as due to lack of evidence that Durova has accepted this, not to her incapacity. She is amply capable and never was a problem admin. Mistakes are part of the job. 16:43	13-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion	What does policy say about moving articles to user space when they have been nominated for deletion?: It's *usually* okay if the one moving is sole author and it's only a notability problem. 03:10	13-03-09		User talk:John Nevard	Your revert on N ray: new section 02:43	13-03-09		Talk:N ray	See-Also to Cold fusion: that a list includes two items does not make them sufficiently related for a See also link. 01:49	13-03-09		User talk:Beantwo	Comment on block: actually, many admins *do* think this way. 01:40	13-03-09		User talk:Yousaf465	Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by Beantwo 01:38	13-03-09		User talk:Yousaf465	Reverted 1 edit by Beantwo identified as vandalism to last revision by Yousaf465. (TW) 01:30	13-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Edits to User talk: Nja247: advice for Beantwo. Hide light under bushel, or collapse box, as the case may be. 18:54	12-03-09		User talk:Beantwo	Comment on block: new section 17:59	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Please keep your distance from SA: Wikipedia has made this very easy. Good move, I approve. SA is welcome back if he'll respect the community. 17:44	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Final request: might indeed be his final request, but not at my request. 17:40	12-03-09		N ray	Undid revision 276750448 by Hipocrite (talk)See Talk. 17:39	12-03-09		Talk:N ray	See-Also to Cold fusion: new section 15:41	12-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by User:Abd: the request should be quickly declined. 15:27	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Please keep your distance from SA: sp link 15:26	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Please keep your distance from SA: the pattern was clear. 14:40	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Final request: No. But don't worry. 14:26	12-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	ScienceApologist asking for a block: he may have been asking for such. However, the edit did improve the article, apparently. But there is a complication. 14:18	12-03-09		N ray	See also: remove link to fringe science article, cold fusion is not pseudoscience, and this link essentially claims that it is. 14:13	12-03-09		User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite	Block disputed: /Ryan, you acted properly. 04:25	12-03-09		Instant-runoff voting	Undid revision 276659708 by 72.75.19.4 (talk)the source doesn't show what is claimed. 04:25	12-03-09		Talk:Instant-runoff voting	American Chemical Society Elections: no, it wasn't last fall, period. 04:12	12-03-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	ScienceApologist abusively editing his Talk page.: I was essentially done with the filing of this. 03:57	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	User talk:ScienceApologist: we'll muddle by without him. 03:46	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Stay off my talkpage: no problem, since you ask so nicely. 03:38	12-03-09		User talk:Hipocrite	Answer to your question: remove section as founded on an error. 03:37	12-03-09		User talk:Hipocrite	Answer to your question: apologize before removing. 03:33	12-03-09		User talk:Abd	Please keep your distance from SA: sure, no problem, I'm done. He's not blocked, I removed the offensive characterisation. 03:27	12-03-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	ScienceApologist abusively editing his Talk page.: new section 03:25	12-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: likewise 03:25	12-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: that too. I'm not a "cold fusion promoter," and if I were, it would still be irrelevant. 02:59	12-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Undid revision 276662712 by ScienceApologist (talk)sorry, you don't get to do that. 02:53	12-03-09		User talk:Hipocrite	Answer to your question: new section 02:15	12-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	test for blacklisting 20:42	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: swimming through molasses. 20:20	11-03-09		User talk:OMCV	cold fusion paper: thanks, OMCV.) (top) [rollback]	 17:36	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: no thought of bad faith even crossed my mind. On lukewarm fusion.	 17:19	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: coming soon to the article, a link to lenr-canr.org	 16:41	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: format	 16:17	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: usage isn't informal if used with clear meaning in a field and in a paper title. 16:10	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: attribute edit to Phil153 16:05	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: Relative reliability of sources only applies to conflict. 15:41	11-03-09		User talk:Carcharoth	My thoughts re fringe science etcetera: SA has been causing long-term damage that may outweigh the total of his contributions. 14:32	11-03-09		Cold fusion	If this isn't the right place for this, please put it in the right place. Cover alternate usage of "cold fusion" in the science of nuclear fusion. 14:14	11-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: sign 14:13	11-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: note about removal of the first part of this section by SA, but the leaving of response to it. 13:36	11-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by User:Abd: punct 13:36	11-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by User:Abd: This was not over spelling. Please read the evidence. 04:20	11-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Useless advice: I think I'm done here. 04:10	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: yes. but there are other approaches 03:56	11-03-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: too late, it's been embedded in History. 03:45	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: return to our regular programming. 03:38	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: there is more than one way to fly 03:25	11-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	Useless advice: perhaps useless, but this isn't only for SA, it is also for those who are tempted to swallow the revisionist history being presented. 02:49	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: laughter is healthy, contempt not. 02:45	11-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: the policy is clearer than the guideline 02:27	11-03-09		User talk:Abd	Your continued incivility on cold fusion: I'm busy 02:22	11-03-09		User talk:Landed little marsdon	Pseudoscience: take it easy, Llm, and good luck. Perhaps not a great idea to parachute into a war zone with no backup. 00:19	11-03-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	request removal of topic ban: there does seem to be a problem here. 00:13	11-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Verbal, glass houses. 00:01	11-03-09		User talk:Abd	Proxy posting: to make this clear, what I did was not proxying at all. If Rothwell had edited the *article*, I could revert it back in if I thought it improved the article. So, a Talk comment? 23:55	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Proxy posting: Thanks, Jehochman. Look a little deeper, please. 23:18	10-03-09		Instant-runoff voting	leave this or provide year of first election. Thanks for updated cite, Rob. 20:16	10-03-09		User talk:Objectivist	ways and means: in olden times. 20:02	10-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	No, it was not me who complained about a spelling correction, it was User:Hipocrite 19:46	10-03-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: oops 19:46	10-03-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: new section 19:12	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell 19:04	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Please be careful, Enric. 18:26	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: "we already know Jed's opinion"? Willing to stand on that statement? 18:21	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Too bad, Enric. This one is worth taking up the WP:DR ladder. 18:12	10-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: sp, punct 18:10	10-03-09		User talk:ScienceApologist	background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA 17:46	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: warning to Verbal 17:41	10-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	He, J., Nuclear fusion inside condense matters. Front. Phys. China: new section 16:44	10-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 276185987 by Phil153 (talk)rv proper rv of banned editor, as useful for discussion. 14:16	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Your continued incivility on cold fusion: finding my sea legs 03:51	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: going in circles. 03:22	10-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Iwamura: respond to Noren, I'd missed thispart of Noren's comment because it got chopped up. 03:04	10-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Iwamura: add note re splitting of Noren comment by Kevin Baas 02:52	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar!: do, please, revert blatant vandalism here, I'll see it anyway, but it is better for those who come here for other purposes. 02:36	10-03-09		User talk:Hu12	your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: dropped these words 02:33	10-03-09		User talk:Hu12	your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: well, too bad. cover the points raised by Hu12 01:35	10-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: NPOV and stuff 18:38	09-03-09		Conflict of interest/Noticeboard	Proposed restrictions on PJHaseldine: support as temporary, reversible ban 18:20	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: about consensus process and our copyright policy 17:58	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: about consensus process and our copyright policy 17:31	09-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard	User:Amolz: review problem. 16:49	09-03-09		User talk:Amithani	sign 16:48	09-03-09		User talk:Amithani	Wecome, Mr. Mithani, and a caution. 16:23	09-03-09		Cold fusion	additional usage of the term "cold fusion." Lukewarm fusion? 16:16	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: and here is how open discussion can improve articles, and incivility is stupid. 15:57	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Iwamura: the point about rush, and, definitely, there was a big rush, there is reliable source on that. 15:24	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Iwamura: Thanks for the pointer, Noren. 15:15	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: new section 14:25	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	40 or 50 orders of magnitude: 40-50 orders of magnitude isn't really an argument against cold fusion. I' 04:30	09-03-09		User talk:Carcharoth	Fringe science: they *can* be ignored, except that they complicate arbitration enforcement. Someone checking contribs for AE then must check each edit for *content* 04:13	09-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	move "leave this section" comment text 04:07	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: the paper do mention "cold fusion" of a kind that Wikipedia doesn't cover. Does anyone care about that? 03:46	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: remove fragment from failed edit 03:45	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: maybe I was deluded by "cold fusion in the title" and the fact that they are running fusion of Zr and Mo. Phil did better. 03:29	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: okay, sure. But with what? 01:39	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science 01:04	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: new section 00:52	09-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Iwamura: new section 22:29	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	More papers mentioning cold fusion.: new section 22:06	08-03-09		User talk:Durova	ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: Sheesh! That takes the cake, Durova. My condolences. 21:47	08-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests	Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science 2?: topic bans must be easy to enforce or else they are worse than useless. 21:37	08-03-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources	He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): add related paper re neutron detector used.) (top) [rollback]	 21:07	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: no, not here. I'm not entirely dim.	 21:05	08-03-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources	He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): fmt	 21:05	08-03-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources	He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): format, abstract to be added. 21:03	08-03-09		User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources	He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): create section 19:47	08-03-09		User talk:Phil153	Pseudo pseudoscientists: ditto and why 19:40	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: thanks, OMCV. Sorry about the risk to your career if you openly discuss. 18:27	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: yes. more. 17:46	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: fix link 17:45	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: remove flying link 17:40	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: missed one point Phil made 17:16	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	finish response in situ. 16:25	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	move section about editor behavior to end of relevant section, it separated the specific discussion from the general one. 16:19	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	Your continued incivility on cold fusion: thanks for the warning, Phil. And thanks for the note, Coppertwig. 14:55	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: respond. 14:04	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A New Reference: nuclear physicists *are* finding evidence for LENR. 13:45	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A New Reference: close paren 13:44	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A New Reference: redact part of my comment, explore meaning of "the wall." Neutrons. 13:14	08-03-09		User talk:Carcharoth	Fringe science: comment on enforcement of topic bans re "harmless" edits. 05:31	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: line breaks 05:30	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: conference proceedings, URL for copies 05:15	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	References: fix one URL 05:11	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: Thanks, OCMV 04:57	08-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	Statement by User:Abd: evidence and conclusion: clear, explicitly stated disruptive intent. 03:46	08-03-09		Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account	Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account: keep 03:39	08-03-09		Vandalism	Undid revision 275729561 by Abd (talk)on second thought .. this should be discussed before being in Policy. 03:32	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A New Reference: LSD's confidence isn't a measure of RS. 03:22	08-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A New Reference: perhaps if we start growing aircraft from seeds, we might well ask the Royal Agricultural Society about aeronautics. 02:54	08-03-09		Vandalism	Undid revision 275484241 by Hipocrite (talk)don't think Hipocrite understood this. See Talk. 02:48	08-03-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar!: "I'm not entirely dim, you know, after all, I am the Supreme Lord." --God, in Time Bandits 01:05	08-03-09		Rashad Khalifa	Undid revision 275412757 by Siriusgray (talk)nothing to do with Rashad Khalifa 22:26	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar!: thanks to those who reverted. Booby prize to the editor who reverted vandalism back in and who wasn't me. 22:17	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	thanks to those who reverted vandalism on my page. I'm choosing to show this, but the removals were correct and appreciated. 22:09	07-03-09		Requests for page protection	: oops 22:09	07-03-09		Requests for page protection	Requesting full protection of User talk:Abd. (TW) 22:06	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: What, trial first, then verdict? What will the Queen say? 22:04	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: Nobody here has claimed that the 2004 DOE review isn't a reliable source for the "mainstream" view in 2004. 17:23	07-03-09		Arbitration/Requests	Request for clarification : Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science: comment suggesting strict enforcement with practical limitation 16:49	07-03-09		User talk:Jehochman	Science Apologist toe across the line: fmt 16:47	07-03-09		User talk:Jehochman	Science Apologist toe across the line: the issue is not spelling corrections. The issue is WP:POINT violation and suspected intent to disrupt Arbitration enforcement. 16:09	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Query: respond to SA and V. 15:11	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: Thanks, Coppertwig, and about tl;dr. 14:20	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Discussion with and about Minhducthandan's edits here: enough, Minhducthandan. 14:11	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: refactor to separate discussion irrelevant to section on calorimetry article, create new section, "Discussion...." 13:49	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what's actually said. 13:12	07-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: at last, someone figures out what I was doing. Thanks, Phil. 12:55	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: what SA could do if his intention is truly helpful. 12:42	07-03-09		User talk:Durova	ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: Does SA actually have a mentor? 12:37	07-03-09		User talk:Durova	ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: gosh, ChildofMidnight may need to read WP:AGF and my comments more carefully. 00:58	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: please be specific about contradiction. 00:53	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: nobody suggested we should give equal prominence to minority views. 00:46	07-03-09		User talk:Abd	AGF: thanks for sharing, Hipocrite. 18:03	06-03-09		User:Synergy/Durova	Oppose, because founded on assumption of prior unworthiness. 17:56	06-03-09		User talk:Durova	Ohai: she never was not ready. 17:48	06-03-09		User talk:Durova	User:ScienceApologist| needs a little guidance, perhaps.: new section 17:33	06-03-09		User talk:Jehochman	Science Apologist toe across the line: new section 17:00	06-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	DEA Chief of Public Affairs: note about reversion. 16:59	06-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	DEA Chief of Public Affairs: about the Category:Drug Enforcement Administration abbreviations and not about editing article again. 16:57	06-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Undid revision 275421204 by Abd (talk)oops 16:56	06-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Undid revision 275421511 by Abd (talk)oops 16:41	06-03-09		Garrison Courtney	External links: inconstent capitalization and usage (DEA? Drug Enforcement Administration?) 16:39	06-03-09		Garrison Courtney	External links: more specific category 16:37	06-03-09		Meredith Thompson	References: oops 16:36	06-03-09		Meredith Thompson	References: Remove obvious spelling error in title of book, unlikely. Possible old vandalism? Didn't check. Place in specific category. 16:31	06-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	DEA Chief of Public Affairs: wrong approach. Content of articles takes precedence over CfD process. 16:02	06-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: my approach to balance with apparent conflict between sources. 04:48	06-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: testimony is presumed true unless controverted. 04:26	06-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: thanks, Enric. That was correct. 04:18	06-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: thanks for your reply, OMCV 03:54	06-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	DEA Chief of Public Affairs: Technically, the category wasn't emptied during the CfD process. It was empty for ten minutes before. How's that? 15:25	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Ignorant? That's uncivil, and gratuitously so, besides being wrong. I know the history of this, I've been spending a lot of time reviewing article history. 02:01	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: this incident could not be clearer as "disrupting Wikipedia to make a point." 01:39	05-03-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	User:ScienceApologist: I conclude this is a WP:POINT violation by User:Hypocrite. Took me a while to figure it out, I thought he was trying to be helfpul. 01:30	05-03-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	User:Abd: eh? puzzled. 01:24	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: eh? who? what? 01:22	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: make it clear that this is not directed to Hipocrite 01:18	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Explain, please: okay, explanation. Thanks for asking. 01:06	05-03-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 275058906 by Hipocrite (talk)accept edit by SA. 00:55	05-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	DEA Chief of Public Affairs: A category with only one member isn't a category, really. It's just a characterstic, as a category, of no value. 00:44	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Cold fusion: hmm... did you also suggest to Phil153, who is the one who brought up parapsychology, that it was off-topic? 00:29	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undid revision 275050059 by ScienceApologist (talk)stay away, SA, per ArbComm. 00:12	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: ISI is owned by Thomson Reuters, which is in partnership with HEP for the Frontiers series. 23:56	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what does "parapsychology" mean in a psychology journal article title? That the publisher is wacko? Really? 23:51	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	Question: it's both a fact and generally accepted among those who have a clue! Look at our article on sonofusion. "Hot enough to ...." 23:40	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what contradiction, exactly, do you have in mind? Citations, please. 23:23	04-03-09		Reliable sources/Noticeboard	Frontiers of Physics in China.: new section 22:34	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: Collecting all the evidence on one side and ignoring the evidence on the other is called "POV pushing." 22:23	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	Question: respond to Minhducthandan. 22:11	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: Fusor not related to cold fusion at all. 22:04	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: find some reliable source! 21:53	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: sauce for one paragraph is sauce for all. 21:52	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: use the same standards for all sides. 21:38	04-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	single-member category, not needed Abd (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC): this is as clear as mud. maybe we know how to write an encyclopedia, but not an instruction manual. 21:36	04-03-09		Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4	NEW NOMINATIONS: DEA Chief of Public Affairs - intrinsically single-member category 21:23	04-03-09		Garrison Courtney	External links: remove single-member category 21:17	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	AfD relistings and closes.: changed my mind, author may have been the subject. 21:08	04-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: make it clear that this discussion includes non-admin closers 21:05	04-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: word 21:04	04-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: the issue here, it's worth exploring. 20:18	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	AfD relistings and closes.: explain the Delete decision 20:12	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	AfD relistings and closes.: relisting doesn 't save any work at all. It is appropriate, sometimes, when there has been some disruption. Closing saves work, if well done. 19:39	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: stuff 19:03	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: electron shells aren't a barrier to fusion. They can be absent at room temperature. 18:30	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	DETC: how about the article on Educational accreditation 18:02	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	History of this institution: opinionated, not poignant. 17:56	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	History of this institution: DETC application history could be verified. 17:50	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Sister school's difficulties: about Iversion 17:48	04-03-09		University of Atlanta	External links: at Beetstra's suggestion, killing the stub marker 17:26	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	2004 sale to a company run by Akber Mithani: pretty good. What happened then. This establishes that the Mathanis bought Barrington and CENUCO? 17:15	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	South Florida Business Journal articles: tie this to UofA? In a way we can use in the article? 16:53	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA.edu: whatever 16:40	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	European Association for Distance Learning: sorry for the inconvenience. 16:37	04-03-09		Talk:European Association for Distance Learning	Notability: sign it -- original time of edit) (top) [rollback]	 16:35	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	2003 Rutland Herald article: Thanks, A. B. Hope you find this hobby rewarding. It's kind of fun, isn't it?	 16:16	04-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	History of this institution: the Barrington "trouble" cited was basically a paperwork glitch, it's not clear what the substance was. They were moving!	 16:13	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: fix name of ancestor of University of Atlanta 16:04	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA.edu: I don't agree that the blacklisting was necessary, but that's a minor issue for now. 15:53	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: respond to drive-by nasty comment. 15:03	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	UofA.edu: I'll look at it. I don't see any emergency here. 15:00	04-03-09		User talk:Abd	Initimdation: is it intimidation to remind people that what they do is visible? If what they are doing is fine, where is the intimidation? There was no threat of action. 04:48	04-03-09		User:Abd/Sandbox	test link 04:29	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: fah! it's late. 03:58	04-03-09		Cold fusion	How did this incorrect title, misspelled, end up here? 03:11	04-03-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: add URL to NY Times source. 03:06	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: Phil, you mistook the third "violation of known physics" for the first. 02:45	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: sure. read Goodstein (1994), which is cited in the article multiple times. 02:42	04-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: it's reliable source, on the face. Think it isn't, you'll have to impeach it with clear evidence, not circular argument. 02:11	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	AfD relistings and closes.: fix some stuff 02:08	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	AfD relistings and closes.: new section 01:41	04-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	February 2009: sorry about the "warning." Luck of the draw. 22:55	03-03-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Lyrikline.org: Yes, cool. I think it's going to be worth the effort. Request comment on intentions. 22:51	03-03-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Lyrikline.org: okay, we can possibly add lyrikline links to several hundred articles, and may eventually gain several hundred new articles. 22:19	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The probability of reaction.: new section 22:04	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Kowalski and Mosier-Boss et al (2008): preposterous above, so preposterous here. 21:54	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Treatment of muon-catalyzed fusion in this article.: Naturewissenschaften an "off topic journal"??? 21:27	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: more on this. 20:45	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: new section 20:02	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: prior 1993 article from this author related to cold fusion. 19:05	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Back to mediation?: filenames of deleted pages? 19:02	03-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: new section 18:37	03-03-09		Garrison Courtney	External links: just too peripheral. 18:36	03-03-09		Garrison Courtney	External links: remove dead link. I think this document had a bio in it, not sure this should have been linked at all, unless page reference were given? 18:31	03-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: why relisters should then !vote Delete or at least support delete. 18:13	03-03-09		User talk:Zetawoof	Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: I understand, I apologize. Will you be more careful next time? 15:25	03-03-09		Village pump (policy)	Is edit-warring the way we establish consensus?: No; however, it can establish "rough consensus," a kind of default. 03:21	03-03-09		Chicago Police Department	Notable former officers: add police officer to name to distinguish from other Pete Kelly 03:20	03-03-09		Chicago Police Department	Notable former officers: wikify. Maybe someone will create an article, or source this. cn tag it. 03:19	03-03-09		Chicago Police Department	Undid revision 274087684 by 24.211.34.78 (talk) actually, no article means no article. 03:16	03-03-09		User talk:Pilkington1984	March 2009: new section) (top) [rollback]	 03:06	03-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: now that the AfD has closed as No Consensus....	 02:53	03-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: thanks, Ron. More discussion is not necessarily better if it's not efficient.	 02:40	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Conclusions re Fringe: place Phil's suggestion as alternative accepted by me. 02:31	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Proposed close of this issue: quote 02:30	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Conclusions re document alteration: say it isn't so. 02:23	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly alters documents: sp 02:21	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Proposed close of this issue: the question about "fringe" is with respect to the instant issue, one specific link, not overall policy. 02:15	03-03-09		Village pump (proposals)	Scrubbing old reverted vandalism from edit history.: Bad idea. 02:08	03-03-09		Village pump (proposals)	Proposed exception rule for the mediawiki blacklist: I don't think exception rules are possible with the present software. However, it's easy to have a URL without the http:// 01:34	03-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Proposed close of this issue: fix quotation of Phil153 01:27	03-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	February 2009: ten closures (as "relisted") in five minutes? 23:50	02-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Deletion process	Relisting after more than "one or two commenting editors": current example of problem relisting 23:31	02-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Re voting by IP editor/vandal who is the nominator: went back and reverted myself, based on certain convincing arguments. Then struck *just the vote*. Sock.) (top) [rollback]	 23:29	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: routine relisting by a single editor is the same as routine closing by one editor.	 23:09	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: assisting a vandal isn't "cleanup." It's extending a mess.	 21:45	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: why I accepted new statement of consensus.	 21:41	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: accept modification as harmless and increasing consensus, pull A. B. comment into collapse box, and sign it for him. 21:34	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: do we have a guideline? 21:32	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: remove comment based on erroneous understanding. 21:28	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: delete comment founded on incorrect understanding of page creation rights. Live and learn. 21:22	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	be careful about being helpful to vandals with an axe to grind. 21:12	02-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	February 2009: I reverted myself on the one reversal I did of your relistings. 21:08	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp	Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by 24.211.34.78 21:07	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: respond to DGG. Correct given the vandalism and the bypass of editing restrictions for new editors? 21:03	02-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion	Relisting? Why?: new section 20:42	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: add link to AN/I report 20:41	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Undid revision 274507089 by Abd (talk)decided to unstrike the argument, leaving the !vote striken. 20:09	02-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Re voting by IP editor who is the nominator: add link to AN/I report 20:05	02-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	why I reverted the reversion of my strikeout. There isn't any reasonable doubt, we don't need SSP reports for what is blatantly obvious. 20:02	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Undid revision 274473422 by Whpq (talk)see the contributions, it is *blatant*. I'll also comment in Talk. 19:58	02-03-09		User talk:Zetawoof	Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: fmt 19:58	02-03-09		User talk:Zetawoof	Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: spiffy barnstar, there. I guess it depends on whom you help. 19:54	02-03-09		User talk:Zetawoof	Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: new section 19:46	02-03-09		User talk:Pilkington1984	Your AfD is being discussed at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: new section 19:43	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: give this a subhead which raises the specific issue with this specific report. 19:39	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: this relisting was a decision by an editor that the community should carefully consider the suggestion of an IP vandal/SPA. 17:58	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: respond to Djsasso 17:51	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp	Undid revision 274284675 by Ron Ritzman (talk)just leave it alone (prior edit removed IP vote) 17:50	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp	Undid revision 274381482 by 24.211.34.78 (talk)just leave it alone! 17:49	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Abusive relistings of AfDs: some may be appropriate. 17:41	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Request admin attention to SPA vandal nomination of WP:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney: change section head to Abusive relistings of AfDs 17:39	02-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	February 2009: will be reverting relistings 17:35	02-03-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Request admin attention to SPA vandal nomination of WP:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney: new section 16:46	02-03-09		User talk:Ron Ritzman	February 2009: new section 16:37	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	strike revote by SPA-vandal nominator 16:31	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: strike sock !vote 16:29	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: note that !Delete vote is by the nominator, who began by vandalizing the article. 16:22	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: shout it from the rooftops 16:21	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: note SPA character of nominator 16:17	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: reopen by Ritzman was abusive and contrary to how AfD works to minimize disruption. 16:07	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: an SPA led us by the nose. 15:44	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: Are multiple marginal causes of notability additive? Is the position notable? 06:47	02-03-09		Talk:European Association for Distance Learning	Notability: stuff found rummaging about. 06:29	02-03-09		Talk:European Association for Distance Learning	Notability: they had a different name before 1999. 05:35	02-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	European Association for Distance Learning: UofA does provide "distance learning in Europe." 05:09	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in Talk:Cold fusion: feed the hobgoblin) (top) [rollback]	 05:08	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	at m:Talk:Spam blacklist: add allegation of copyvio at failed RfAr request	 04:55	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in archives for Talk:Cold fusion: add Martin Fleischmann comments re copyvio	 04:51	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Conclusions re Fringe: Arthur Rubin, will you reconsider?	 04:32	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	General Discussion of this process: sign it 04:31	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	General Discussion of this process: about the closings and about proceeding. 04:21	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Links to lenr-canr.org were allegedly linkspammed: resolved 04:17	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Link was allegedly inserted by JedRothwell, alleged POV-pusher and COI: resolved 04:13	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: resolved. 03:55	02-03-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	Should readers be given a link to the paper where they can read it?: fix conclusion sections, intention to close some sections, noncontroversial 03:21	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in Talk for Cold fusion: head 03:21	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in articles: head 03:19	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in Talk for Cold fusion: bullets not numbers 03:19	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in articles: bullets not numbers 03:17	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in archives for Talk:Cold fusion: at meta 02:03	02-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	in articles: in Talk and in Talk archives 01:08	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: what makes a school "extremely" minor as distinct from simply "minor."? 01:00	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: about that UM Broadcast Journalism Department site search. 00:57	02-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: Note that references added, and it's easy to find "Section Chief, Public Affairs, DEA." 00:35	02-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Border and Transportation Security Directorate? US Immigration and Customs Enforcement? Souce says the former, a red link. The Directorate exists. 00:13	02-03-09		Garrison Courtney	remove DEA Museum assertion, source not quickly found. 00:12	02-03-09		Garrison Courtney	link to Palm Beach Post copy of South Florida Sun-Sentinel article referring to Courtney as Public Affairs chief for the DEA, a few days ago. 23:59	01-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Note to self: Preview before hitting Save. 23:57	01-03-09		Garrison Courtney	source NoMoCo editorship. 23:47	01-03-09		Garrison Courtney	fix link 23:46	01-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Until something better and more direct comes up, as I'm sure it will 23:35	01-03-09		Garrison Courtney	Reference Katherine Harris job. 23:14	01-03-09		Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney	Garrison Courtney: Keep. So stub it! 23:05	01-03-09		User talk:Hu12	your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: sp 23:03	01-03-09		User talk:Hu12	your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: Thanks again. 17:56	01-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: urge anyone still highly skeptical to read this. Skepticism is still appropriate, but .... 17:43	01-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: I think Shanahan may appreciate the simplicity of this. 17:41	01-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: more than one way to skin a cat. Ah! Ugly metaphor, eh? 17:38	01-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Kowalski and Mosier-Boss et al (2008): create new subsection. 17:29	01-03-09		Talk:Ernst Jandl	propose lyrikline link 17:25	01-03-09		Talk:Marie Luise Kaschnitz	fix link 17:24	01-03-09		Talk:Mascha Kaléko	propose lyrikline link) (top) [rollback]	 17:21	01-03-09		Talk:Marie Luise Kaschnitz	propose lyrikline link.	 17:16	01-03-09		Talk:Michael Lentz	Link to Author page on Lyrikline.org: new section	 17:10	01-03-09		Talk:Paul Maar	Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: remove redundant sig.	 17:10	01-03-09		Talk:Paul Maar	Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: move wayward text	 17:08	01-03-09		Talk:Paul Maar	Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: add note re language, this author's page doesn't have English translations. 17:02	01-03-09		Talk:Paul Maar	Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: new section 16:50	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	regarding the whitelisting.: the blacklisting was definitely inhibiting the use of Lyrikline.org as a reference. 16:39	01-03-09		Harris Khalique	add reflist 16:36	01-03-09		Harris Khalique	Writing: remove unnecessary peacock 16:29	01-03-09		Talk:Amanda Stewart	Amanda Stewart page on Lyrikline.org now linked: new section) (top) [rollback]	 16:26	01-03-09		Amanda Stewart	restore now-whitelisted link previously removed without discussion, add link info, remove redundant "reference") (top) [rollback] 16:18	01-03-09		Shona language	Possible external link for this article.: adding the proposed link to Lyrikline.org page for Chirikure Chirikure) (top) [rollback]	 16:18	01-03-09		Talk:Shona language	External links: add link to Shona example, with audio of Chirikure Chirikure reading his work, and translations, see Talk.	 15:56	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	University of Atlanta: thanks for your help	 15:32	01-03-09		User talk:Hu12	your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: new section	 15:25	01-03-09		User talk:Misarxist	Your requested whitelisting of lyrikline.org page: Ultimately, your request led to whitelisting. 15:21	01-03-09		Talk:Michael Krüger (writer)	Michael Kruger page at lyrikline.org: whitelisted link added.) (top) [rollback]	 15:20	01-03-09		Michael Krüger (writer)	External links: wikify German language) (top) [rollback] 15:18	01-03-09		Michael Krüger (writer)	External links: add Lyrikline.org link per Talk. 07:48	01-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	#NAME? 07:48	01-03-09		User talk:Abd/JzG	Edits asserting copyright violation: new section 07:28	01-03-09		User talk:Orlady	Thanks for your work with University of Atlanta: new section 07:10	01-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	History of this institution: Barrington appears to have begun the accreditation process, completed as UofA. 07:06	01-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	European Association for Distance Learning: sign it 07:06	01-03-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	European Association for Distance Learning: on this. 06:46	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	regarding the whitelisting.: content should be King, not fighting spam. Original editor COI is moot once content has been reviewed by independent editors. 06:30	01-03-09		Talk:European Association for Distance Learning	Notability: Not up to me! 01:46	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	External Link Spamming: rudeness isn't policy. 01:29	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	External Link Spamming: reply to Enric. 01:25	01-03-09		User talk:Abd	External Link Spamming: Apology for ABF requested.