User:Abd/2009 contributions/May

00:00	16-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: my condolences, but high motivation from fringe editors is partly due to unfair treatment. 23:33	15-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": more. suspect complex mathematical explanations of simple phenomena. 22:27	15-05-09		User talk:Rracecarr	Friction with water?: new section) (top) [rollback]	 21:51	15-05-09		User talk:Mistro12	Sockpuppetry case: fmt	 21:45	15-05-09		User talk:Mistro12	Sockpuppetry case: okay, taking this at face value.	 21:31	15-05-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	Deletion: it's a balance.	 20:23	15-05-09		User talk:Literaturegeek	primary sources: in the end, it's all up to editorial consensus.	 19:56	15-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": Oh, goody! If I'm wrong I get to learn something. Being right is boring. 19:29	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	AfD nomination of University of Atlanta: thanks, A.B. 19:22	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets 19:21	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: thanks. 19:11	15-05-09		User talk:Mistro12	Sockpuppetry case: fmt 19:11	15-05-09		User talk:Mistro12	Sockpuppetry case: disclose all, the fastest way to resolve this with a positive result. 18:16	15-05-09		Talk:University of Atlanta	advice for A. Mithani. 17:10	15-05-09		John Bockris	If we are going to give only a decade, this is more accurate. He didn't start until mid-1989, no earlier.) (top) [rollback]	 17:08	15-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: respond to Enric.	 16:55	15-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undue Weight: Hipocrite POV not consensus, no consensus yet found on these questions.	 16:34	15-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reliability of sources: this header level screwed up the TOC.	 16:30	15-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	how did this section end up in the middle of the Reliable Sources discussion? Give section title some more meat.	 16:27	15-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some News: a collapse title should be reasonably neutral and descriptive. 16:14	15-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": viscosity of water is negligible. Hydraulic pressure has been overlooked. 15:10	15-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	Winners: cite 2008 book publisher page 14:56	15-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	Winners: independent reference Rusty Morrison, 2008. 14:49	15-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	Winners: citation for Sharon Olds, 1983 14:44	15-05-09		Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	List of Awardees: hmmph! 14:35	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: Laughlin award succeeded the Lamont Poetry Prize, first given in 1954. 14:21	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	Laughlin Award & Academy of American Poets: Thanks. 13:30	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: qualify 13:30	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: Okay, I'll try. 13:25	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Findings and remedies about Abd: agree with Carcharoth 04:39	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Abd's pursuit of dispute resolution: new section 03:58	15-05-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Proposed topic ban of user:Scuro from Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: reply to Durova. 03:04	15-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": original research.... 02:24	15-05-09		User talk:Beetstra	Lostthegame whitelisting: Okay. 02:09	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Multiple, unsynchronized definitions of "uninvolved": comment. 02:02	15-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hi: welcome, have some tea. 01:33	15-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: IAR should never be a block rationale; it is, rather, a possible defense against blocking while involved, if recusal disclosing involvement is immediate. 15:09	14-05-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Topic ban user:Scuro: Nja247 should not be the one to close this, nor the one to ban and maintain the ban. 14:46	14-05-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Topic ban user:Scuro: support. 14:24	14-05-09		User talk:Beetstra	Lostthegame whitelisting: you anticipated the trusted users concept. Wow! Even better work! 14:16	14-05-09		User talk:Beetstra	Lostthegame whitelisting: great job, Beetstra, looks very good. 13:37	14-05-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	pokerverdict.com: I got confused. It wasn't JzG. I thought Stifle at first, then looked up and saw JzG. What's wrong with this coffee? 13:34	14-05-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist	pokerverdict.com: you can ask the admin to reconsider. But, other admins: it might save JzG some trouble if you delist without that. Either way is fine. 04:33	14-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": my, my, touchy. 00:02	14-05-09		Talk:List of common misconceptions	Water Hose Misconception: Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": explain again. 23:28	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: if you notify properly, "review" might mean that nobody does anything, which effectively affirms the action without prejudice. 20:49	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: how to deal with too few admins, short-term. 20:38	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Notability of Academy of American Poets?: this is useful content. I'm prepared to defend it. 20:32	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	Winners: List of judges 20:06	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Notability of Academy of American Poets?: list of public information not copyrightable 19:54	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Notability of Academy of American Poets?: update. copyright? 19:44	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	okay, remove some arguable OR, leave less. 17:22	13-05-09		Talk:Academy of American Poets	Disputed??: removed the notability tag only. 17:18	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	remove notability tag alone, not specifically justified. Other tag may be okay. 17:16	13-05-09		Talk:Academy of American Poets	Disputed??: that's right. none of us are required to do anything here. 17:09	13-05-09		Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	List of Awardees: showing judges is harmless, but I also don't consider it truly necessary. For now, I respect the work done to put it there. 17:07	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	remove all but lead paragraph. 17:05	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	James Laughlin Award: from main article to here, merge content. 17:03	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	James Laughlin Award: add link to list. 17:00	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	remove notability tag, there is sufficient source, but as a List article, this is supporting and is supported by the main article on the organization giving it. 16:58	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	moved Talk:James Laughlin Award to Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.) (top 16:58	13-05-09		Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	moved Talk:James Laughlin Award to Talk:List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization. 16:58	13-05-09		James Laughlin Award	moved James Laughlin Award to List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization.) (top 16:58	13-05-09		Talk:James Laughlin Award	moved James Laughlin Award to List of winners of the James Laughlin Award: make into list article to support article on organization. 16:57	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	moving to list article, removed some possibly unnecessary stuff, but then left some too. This *might* justify an article other than a mere List. This will be followed by a move. 16:48	13-05-09		List of winners of the James Laughlin Award	prepare to convert to List article. 16:46	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: sp 16:46	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	1600 admins: sure, the active number is much less, though that doesn't affect the cogency of the argument that there are many. 16:39	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	The view from the cheap seats: ass = grass if I abuse this. 16:22	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Notability of Academy of American Poets?: a bit of ping-pong at the article, the attention of other editors would be useful. 16:18	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	Undid revision 289688195 by Collectonian (talk)Please, if a tag is proper, replace it with discussion in Talk of THAT tag. 16:16	13-05-09		Talk:Academy of American Poets	Disputed??: no specificity to complaints. 16:07	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry	Notability of Academy of American Poets?: okay, removed tags and I suggest solution to lists of winners of awards 16:01	13-05-09		Academy of American Poets	remove tags inadequately supported. 16:00	13-05-09		Talk:Academy of American Poets	Disputed??: removing the tag and why. 14:50	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Good advice for Abd: Thanks, Viridae. The advice could be generalized. 14:43	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	The view from the cheap seats: responses, ideas. 14:18	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	The view from the cheap seats: Agree. Especially with the "intelligent and good person" part! 13:58	13-05-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: the problem. Efficiency (necessary) vs. Fascism (excessive and dangerous) 11:38	13-05-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: very skilled con artist, or possible Nobel Prize winner? Fun. Let' 11:25	13-05-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: Truth will come out for those who look and watch and wait, don't you think? 05:22	13-05-09		Robert Duncan (physicist)	fix link text) (top) [rollback]	 05:21	13-05-09		WikiProject Biography/Assessment/Assessment Drive/Lists/New16	moved article) (top) [rollback] 05:17	13-05-09		Cold fusion	replace biological transmutation link. As long as it's consensus that Condensed matter nuclear science and Low energy nuclear reactions redirect here, this belongs. 05:06	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	Good advice for Abd: new section 04:58	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	The view from the cheap seats: Thanks, Jehochman. 04:55	13-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	The view from the cheap seats: Whoever is reviewing your logs, MastCell, it isn't me. 04:41	13-05-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: Summary: OMCV, go away. Your discussion here is not aimed at improving text but at ridicule and insult. 20:41	05-12-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Proposed decision	So far so good.: new section 20:18	05-12-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: I see no way to assess due weight without making a content judgment 18:49	05-12-09		Robert Duncan (physicist)	start stub. more facts in Sci Am and other sources. 18:41	05-12-09		Robert Duncan	change to specify) (top) [rollback]	 18:40	05-12-09		Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist)	moved Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist) to Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri	 18:40	05-12-09		Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist)	moved Robert Duncan (physicist) to Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri	 18:40	05-12-09		Robert Duncan (physicist)	moved Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist) to Talk:Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri) (top) [rollback] 18:40	05-12-09		Talk:Robert Duncan (physicist)	moved Robert Duncan (physicist) to Robert C. Duncan (astrophysicist): There is another physicist, Robert Duncan, vice-chancellor of research at the University of Missouri) (top) [rollback]	 16:49	05-12-09		User talk:Newyorkbrad	Question about the Abd / JzG case: hope it's okay to comment here.	 16:20	05-12-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: to judge "inappropriate" as to balance, we need to make content judgments. And with Cold fusion, the balance is far from clear. It's media RS vs. peer-reviewed RS. 15:09	05-12-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: respond at length. 11:34	05-12-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: rambling? no, examining a topic from more than one POV, which is disconcerting to some. 11:12	05-12-09		User talk:Abd	Mills: no opinion on Mills. 02:38	05-12-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undue Weight: hydrino theory, recent paper by Mills published in International Association for Hydrogen Energy (Elsevier) 02:06	05-12-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some News: fmt 02:05	05-12-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Some News: yes, interesting. 21:04	05-11-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undue Weight: actually, the straw poll was not about the version you have now been removing. It was about another version. 21:01	05-11-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Current or other version: This one is much more brief to address undue weight concerns. I reverted to it. 20:43	05-11-09		Cold fusion	revert per Talk. While it's possible this version is out of balance, current opinion seems to be that this is better than the version being reverted back. It addressed the undue weight concerned and is verifiable. 18:47	05-11-09		User talk:Kirk shanahan	Begin to narrow discussion: Kites can be flown. 18:31	05-11-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org (2): Agreed. Inferior or problematic source is better than no source, unless harm is greater than good. 18:21	05-11-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Undue Weight: well, it gets easier, if one is patient. 18:19	05-11-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A conference paper, not peer-reviewed: if the Vysotskii paper were the one presented a year later, I'd be claiming "notable minority opinion." Since that one is cited by Storms. 17:45	05-11-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	lenr-canr link: about "verified permission." That was an unstable overstatement of the guideline, removed the same day Verbal made his removal. 17:30	05-11-09		Martin Fleischmann	Conference proceedings: remove unverified reprint disclaimer per Verbal, revert this edit if you believe the disclaimer should be there. 17:25	05-11-09		Martin Fleischmann	Undid revision 286702999 by Verbal (talk)rv good-faith edit per Talk. 17:24	05-11-09		Talk:Martin Fleischmann	lenr-canr link: why I'm restoring the link: this decision was specific, and consensus was clear and settled until Verbal removed it. 17:18	05-11-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: actually, the link has been removed, and apparently nobody noticed, since it was a settled consensus after much discussion. 17:04	05-11-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: Short answer: Yes, of course, since you insist on an answer. But it's moot. 03:58	05-11-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: I love the sound of that parachute. 03:37	05-11-09		Talk:Cold fusion	I'm dropping work on the version of the article here: new section 01:16	05-11-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org (2): respond to question of alteration. 20:35	05-10-09		User talk:Abd	Re discussion on Newyorkbrad's talk page: stuff 20:06	05-10-09		User talk:Newyorkbrad	Point of information: Edit this to remove possible misunderstandings. Clarify a few comments. 14:30	05-10-09		User:Abd/NPOV and how to find it	create essay) (top 05:48	05-10-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: by no means complete 05:45	05-10-09		Blacklight Power	Reactions in the scientific community: Uh, that was a BLP violation. Cold fusion isn't pseudoscience, got RS for that? 04:11	05-10-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: heavy weight is placed on passing mention in a source showing no familiarity with the depth of replication. Remove that source, make text more neutral. 03:58	05-10-09		Cold fusion	Discussion: and this was redundant also! and "not observed" actually covers it. (By the way, this proposal isn't common in present CF theory.) 03:51	05-10-09		Cold fusion	2.- The branching ratio: remove *quadruple* redundancy and make this more coherent. 03:45	05-10-09		Cold fusion	1.- The probability of reaction: rate for what? 03:33	05-10-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished over Civility discussion: Further process on this is unlikely to come from me. JzG is not my target. Wasn't, and won't be. 03:13	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Template: Oppose. Beetstra, you might give this proposal a title. 03:05	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate use of newenergytimes.com: Moot 03:04	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evaluation: grammar 03:02	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evaluation: Don't oppose a sound policy on the grounds that it will be applied mindlessly. 02:47	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: add 1.1 that practically begs for assurances from JzG 02:32	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold fusion: important word dropped 02:27	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd's zealous pursuit of dispute resolution: my, my, SBHB, AGF. 02:18	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Discussion recommended: ack, that was a copy and paste, must have missed the first bracket 02:17	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Discussion recommended: point to page noted by Beetstra 02:14	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: not an expert except compared to Mathsci 01:39	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG briefly desysopped: respond to Coppertwig. 01:35	05-10-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG briefly desysopped: turn support to oppose: a slap on the wrist is punitive. 16:34	05-09-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: much flap over no content. 16:29	05-09-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reliability of sources: sign with original timestamp 16:21	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using newenergytimes.com: Moot. Example. 16:20	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate use of lenr-canr.org: Moot. 16:19	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Inappropriate sourcing using lenr-canr.org: Moot. 16:18	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's actions in blacklisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com: Oppose, and why. 16:14	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG briefly desysopped: Support as adequate, proposed modification. 16:10	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished and instructed: Support. 16:09	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed Findings of Fact: sp 16:06	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed Findings of Fact: Support. 16:01	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	No Personal Attacks: Support and explain. 15:53	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Decorum and civility: support. One does wonder what proposals on this page JzG would support. I suppose he can respond at any time. 15:52	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evaluation: sign 15:51	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evaluation: respond to MastCell; I think the matter becomes very clear. 15:27	05-09-09		User talk:Alecmconroy	Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: add note re possible "disruption." 15:16	05-09-09		User talk:Alecmconroy	Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: sp 15:15	05-09-09		User talk:Alecmconroy	Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: typo 15:12	05-09-09		User talk:Alecmconroy	Thanks for your evidence at RfAr/Abd and JzG: new section 14:09	05-09-09		User talk:Abd	MgATP cyclotron: don't waste my time. 02:18	05-09-09		Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder	coatrack and undue weight issues: it's not necessary to make a determination of what is "fringe." 02:12	05-09-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Congratulations on your whitelisting: new section 02:04	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: two additional links to lenr-canr.org whitelisted. 01:56	05-09-09		Cold fusion	Bibliography: add convenience link, freshly whitelisted. 01:48	05-09-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: Thanks, Beetstra. 01:40	05-09-09		Talk:Cold fusion	A conference paper, not peer-reviewed: technical point. There is a connection with cold fusion. 01:16	05-09-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reliability of sources: Yes, this poll was set up abusively. 00:56	05-09-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Discussion recommended: yes, indeed. Thanks, Beetstra. 20:14	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold fusion: yet, it moves. 17:26	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd urged: do I begin to see the dimensions of the problem? 17:18	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Reliability of sources: urk 17:17	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	collapse disruptive poll. Don't poll over every disagreement! There should have been more discussion before the first poll, this one is beyond the pale. 17:02	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: done here, for now. 16:54	05-08-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Is Storms RS? What about "heat dissipated into the lattice"?: about stuff and assocation. 16:50	05-08-09		User talk:Enric Naval	Is Storms RS? What about "heat dissipated into the lattice"?: new section 15:45	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: on the polls. 15:36	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: modify, the question contained an incorporated assumption. 15:34	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: uncivil? How? 15:25	05-08-09		User talk:EdChem	Your comment about me on Talk:Newyorkbrad: fix link 15:24	05-08-09		User talk:EdChem	Your comment about me on Talk:Newyorkbrad: new section 15:20	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: fmt 15:20	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: recusal is actually a safety and a protection, but recusal policy does not trump WP:IAR. 15:15	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: respond to Fritzpoll's questions; this is a common question among admins, and apparently more complete guidance is in order. Doesn't have to be done here, but AC can set some principles. 14:38	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: respond to Matchsci. 14:09	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's administrator actions on Cold fusion: about the meta blacklisting, Beetstra is correct. 14:02	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold fusion: reply to Carcharoth. 13:54	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Which is better?: clarify and specify. 13:53	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: Hipocrite, have you read the DoE reviews? What does fraud have to do with this? Even Huizenga doesn't assert fraud, and Taubes' allegations were never supported. 13:43	05-08-09		User talk:Abd	Rewrite of Wikipedia:Spam blacklist: ce 13:41	05-08-09		User talk:Abd	Rewrite of Wikipedia:Spam blacklist: Thanks, Beetstra. 11:13	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: Incorrect about Storms. Not a one-liner. 2 pages, one line is his reference to it as sufficiently reported to deserve theoretical attention. 08:18	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: format 08:15	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: Did I get your intention right, Enric? (fix numbering problem.	 08:11	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Vysotskii and biological transmutation: new section	 08:09	05-08-09		User talk:Newyorkbrad	Point of information: well, I think I should answer this. Hope this is okay, NYB. and respond to EdChem.	 07:11	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: radical proposal: use peer-reviewed RS to determine what's in the article.	 06:57	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd urged: Eh? Okay, I promise. 06:45	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd's zealous pursuit of dispute resolution: okay, if that's what you want to say. Is zealous good or bad? Could anyone who isn't patient and determined successfully deal with abuse by a popular admin? 06:19	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Discussion recommended: Support. 06:16	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG reminded: odd reluctance to assert actual involvement. 06:11	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's commitment to avoid further involvement: Sure. But. 06:00	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evaluation: Is recusal when involved optional? Merely "better" but it's fine if you don't? 05:43	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Evolution of standards for "involved" administrators: Support the comment, but not the comment on the comment. 05:28	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's administrator actions on Cold fusion: this was *not* about a content dispute. 05:06	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG and Cold fusion: oppose 04:46	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Nature of the dispute: not "extensive noticeboard discussions" on the recusal topic. 04:24	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution: Support 04:23	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Avoiding even the appearance of impropriety: Support 04:23	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrator tools in disputes: Support 04:22	05-08-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators: Support 01:51	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Condensed matter nuclear science: new section 01:30	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	or muons: ruminate on V's proposal, why we can't do this with the article, and general considerations. 00:43	05-08-09		Talk:Cold fusion	or muons: no, not in the article just because it might make sense. We need a basis in reliable source, unless by some miracle we get clear, stable consensus on it. Ain't gonna happen. 20:39	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Other comments: no doubt that Version 1 needs improvement. It might be balanced, though, by moving the theoretical considerations in another section here. 20:27	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Current or other version: link to version current as of comment and to version as then edited by Hipocrite. Folks, feel free to update references for your !votes in this section. 20:13	05-07-09		User talk:Objectivist	Moved your comment in the poll at Cold fusion: new section) (top) [rollback]	 20:04	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Other comments: fmt	 20:03	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Which is better?: move V's comment to keep it tidy, I assume he will accept this, if he doesn't, he's welcome to revert me.	 19:59	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Other comments: extended comment on Hipocrite's misunderstanding of consensus process, and implications.	 16:43	05-07-09		Muon-catalyzed fusion	Some problems facing practical exploitation: cd "for" is colloquial for break-even and break-even means just less than what's needed for excess thermal energy. 16:23	05-07-09		Talk:Cold fusion	The elephant in the living room: What "proposed explanations"?: new section 15:19	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: naive view of experts, who tend to imagine that they are more qualified to judge what's important in a topic than non-experts or even other experts. 15:02	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Enforcement of content policies and involvement: WP:DAS: Don't Assume Stupidity. 14:50	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: confirm that concerns were expressed by many editors. 14:40	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Resolution of recusal failure: more as a party. 14:22	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: ce 14:17	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: this shows the danger of making quick assumptions without a detailed and balanced discussion underneath them. 13:52	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: on the block of Rothwell. Yes, there was support, but there wasn't a process that considered it in sufficient depth. 13:38	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: this shows the problem we have with experts. They typically have a POV (or what looks to us like a POV). Arent't they supposed to advocate it in Talk? If done within behavioral guidelines, why not? 13:26	05-07-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Please avoid repetition: a little more on a proposed process change. 11:24	05-07-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Please avoid repetition: thanks, NYB. 11:19	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Loci of dispute: Nice. 11:15	05-07-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: Thanks, Beetstra. Jed Rothwell Rothwell was in compliance with COI rules. We expect COI editors to "push" a POV, that's why we have COI rules! 02:36	05-07-09		Devarda's alloy	Long-debated question of the nascent hydrogen: sp 02:31	05-07-09		Devarda's alloy	Long-debated question of the nascent hydrogen: remove redundant word, misspelled to boot. 02:17	05-07-09		User talk:Abd	Verbal welcome to post here.: new section 00:27	05-07-09		Cold fusion	Reverted edits by Shinkolobwe (talk) to last version by ArthurBot 20:36	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: comment on that first Talk page post. I suggest reading the RfC, it's got more detail, as I recall. 20:11	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: not to make this into a content debate .... the point is strong POV, asserted over a long period of time. 19:43	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Analysis of evidence presented by Abd: review Fritzpolls analysis; let's not forget the readers! 16:29	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd admonished: how could I possibly object to good counsel? 16:16	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: two heads are better than one, and can put wikilawyers out of business. 16:06	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Avoiding the appearance of impropriety: about appearance of involvement and avoiding it with recusal at the drop of a glove. 15:48	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Prior admonition: brilliant: call attention to EdChem's citation from RfAr/C68-FM-SV re desysopping in a ruling that appears to have covered JzG. 15:36	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: that's great, A.B.! Thanks. 15:29	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Loci of dispute: Mathsci is repeating arguments that have been made and considered in detail and rejected by consensus. 15:16	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: extended discussion of blacklisting 14:34	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: more on recusal, "gaming the system" actually doesn't apply. 13:51	05-06-09		User talk:Carcharoth	The situation when ArbCom members are recused: some thoughts on this. 13:27	05-06-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Collapsing of threads: I'd prefer to use collapse. It encourages me to organize into "most important" and "extended discussion." 03:46	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: convenience links are important 03:25	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: say maybe too much, this is going way too far afield. I'll stop now! 03:10	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Loci of dispute: agree with AB on both points. 02:43	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: sp 02:39	05-06-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: attempt to clear up some confusion about administrative roles. 02:01	05-06-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: missing word 01:59	05-06-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: Dan, you surprise me, but I'll ask your advice any way. 22:54	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd has confrontational style: fastest way to learn: be wrong. If you pay attention and aren't attached to being right! 22:35	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG strongly admonished: thanks EdChem, nice. 20:18	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Enforcement of content policies and involvement: Content policy is not to be "enforced with tools," excepting mission-critical policies like COPYVIO and BLP. 19:59	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: is this so difficult? 17:36	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: wow! is this a hot-button topic or what. My Talk page, how about not reading it if it gets you upset. See the warning at the top of the page! 17:25	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished: like who? 17:22	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: yes, we get it, Beetstra. What make you think we don't? 17:06	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: recusal can be for any reason, it doesn't refer only to recusal required by policy. 16:51	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Enforcement of content policies and involvement: r to EdChem. Thanks, BTW, for other comments. 16:34	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: Verbal, go away and stay away from my Talk page. 15:49	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: please don't troll for reports to ANI; Enric, go away. 15:41	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	add more, though. 15:38	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd has confrontational style: recuse. 15:34	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: sure, it's possible. but the exceptions that make it possible don't apply and are covered, anyway, under WP:IAR. 15:25	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Abd admonished: recuse but a little comment 15:19	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG strongly admonished: two concerns 14:26	05-05-09		Requests for page protection	Current requests for unprotection: correct error 14:19	05-05-09		Requests for page protection	Requesting Unprotection of Condensed matter nuclear science. (TW) 14:11	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: BTW 14:02	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: complicated. 13:48	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Enforcement of content policies and involvement: confirm and give example relevant to the basis for this case. 12:19	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: Beetstra unable to see the forest for the trees. 04:13	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: Usurpation 04:09	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: tangled web. 03:42	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: move from User talk:Abd/IP 03:41	05-05-09		User talk:Abd	Hipocrite: new section 03:39	05-05-09		User talk:Abd/IP	Hipocrite: move to my Talk page. 03:38	05-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: put comments back as apparently intended. 03:27	05-05-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version should be used but balanced: Thanks, Hipocrite, I've been trying to figure out how to keep # numbering with comments, now I see! 03:15	05-05-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	Norton AntiVirus: I'll ask the editor. 03:13	05-05-09		User talk:TechOutsider	Your February request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: new section 02:52	05-05-09		User talk:Stephen Bain	JzG & Abd: Thanks, Bainer 02:45	05-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Bainer's evidence: I write what I see, I've been doing it for many years. 02:31	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution is about compromise: about compromise and the limits of compromise. 02:03	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished: Fritzpoll's version below is better. 02:02	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG strongly admonished: ce, sign 01:58	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG strongly admonished: support conditionally. 01:46	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's use of the spam blacklist: whitelisting, suggested by blacklist admins as if it were easy, isn't. Many reasonable requests are denied, even where no linkspam hazard exists. 01:28	05-05-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Collapsing of threads: hmmph. I wear bifocals, have for many years. 01:25	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrative tools in a dispute: sign the original collapse with original time of edit 01:24	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrative tools in a dispute: honor objection to collapse. 01:20	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrative tools in a dispute: actually, strike this, no response, so I'm deleting it. Objection? restore with strike, thanks. (the word "content" shouldn't be there.) 01:03	05-05-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: meta and en.wiki are independent 20:56	05-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Collapsing of threads: smalltext? 20:45	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: r to Jehochman. Important issue. 20:28	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: "concerns were not about cold fusion, and it took three months, much disruption, an RfC, and the filing of an RfAr and a question from an arbitrator to extract an inadequate agreement.	 20:14	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrative tools in a dispute: move EN's comment (I expect EN won't mind that.) and respond to Jehochman.	 19:29	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Use of administrative tools in a dispute: support Fritzpoll's version as correct (as well as others) 19:23	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: respond to Mathsci. Obviously, I was too brief for this editor. 19:21	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: copy edit. 18:13	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: fascinating. 16:43	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: r to MastCell and Enric Naval 16:37	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: another phony problem asserted to weaken recusal policy. 16:05	05-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Bainer's evidence: what it shows. 15:57	05-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Bainer's evidence: r to Bainer, thanks a ton! 15:48	05-04-09		Cold fusion	See also: why, shore, more than one way to remove epidermis from a feline. 15:45	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: separate responses from listed straw poll !votes 15:42	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source 15:19	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: Enabling? 15:03	05-04-09		User talk:Kirk shanahan	Begin to narrow discussion: how bout fixing the terminology first? 15:00	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished: be bold! 14:59	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG admonished: support and explain. 14:00	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: not out for blood. Desysopping is bloodless, preventative, not punitive. And if not on the table, more disruption will be likely. 13:49	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: ask Fritzpoll a question. 13:45	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: update with reference to Stifle recusal. 13:42	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: if consensus is the goal, less is less. 13:37	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: ce 13:30	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: and to express the disagreement with Nick. 13:27	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: agree generally with Nick and expand on it. 12:20	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: CMNS? 12:13	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: finish, sign. 11:26	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: about copyright permission. 11:21	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: thanks, Stifle. 11:19	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	meenaonthenet.com: Thanks, Stifle. 11:09	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version should be used but balanced: fix confusion 11:07	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version provides too much weight to a single, unreliable source: V is right. 11:00	05-04-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Abd's version does not overweight any source: we don't vote, but I consider a straw poll okay to delineate positions before the real process starts. 10:40	05-04-09		Zero-point energy	Experimental evidence for vacuum energy: punct 10:38	05-04-09		Zero-point energy	Experimental evidence for vacuum energy: clean up ref 10:27	05-04-09		Infinite Energy (magazine)	sp) (top) [rollback]	 03:26	05-04-09		Cold fusion	These should be external links rather than See Also.	 03:19	05-04-09		Cold fusion	Observations needing to be addressed by theory: add some footnotes (not full citations)	 03:04	05-04-09		Cold fusion	Challenges to be face by theory: sp	 03:03	05-04-09		Cold fusion	Challenges: header	 03:02	05-04-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 287564272 by Hipocrite (talk)Discuss in Talk. 02:56	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG desysopped: reply to NYB. 02:47	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: what was declined? 02:45	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: Okay, some evidence. 02:33	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse: and now ... the word "desysopped." I hope not, but it has to be said. 01:49	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse: explain precedent. 01:42	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed principles: here it is, first mention of "removal of administrative privileges," but as a contingency. 01:25	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed principles: correct numbering 01:24	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG has not acknowledged his duty to recuse 01:19	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposals by Abd: JzG has not acknowledged involvement 01:12	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: whitelisting requested for convenience copy 01:10	05-04-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: definitely not resolved, whitelisting declined today. 00:48	05-04-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Bainer's "evidence": there is no commentary in the evidence Stephen transcribed. 00:18	05-04-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	meenaonthenet.com: incorrect to "defer to meta." 23:58	05-03-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: revise comment 21:41	05-03-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: Thanks for the prompt response. Tl:dr? moi? 21:33	05-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Bainer's "evidence": what commentaries? 21:25	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: Risker is, of course, correct. 21:16	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: more source. 21:00	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: ref for Widom-Larsen theory. (article by Larsen). 20:59	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: some sources on this. 20:49	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: book review on this topic. 20:35	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: and now for something completely different 20:02	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: link to Kozima 19:58	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: title of paper 19:54	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: references to Storms. 19:20	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Regarding CF explanations: review by Scott Chubb 19:17	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Regarding CF explanations: interview with Storms. 19:00	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Regarding CF explanations: actually, Storms is RS and there is plenty besides. 18:51	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Storms material.: Most scientiests are employed or retained as consultants in their field! This is wikilawyering away reliable source, cut it out! 18:22	05-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks	Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: sp 18:22	05-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks	Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: remove extra sig 18:21	05-03-09		Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks	Clerk attention required at Abd/JzG: question about use of section reserved for parties by non-parties. 18:15	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Tools exist primarily to sanction behavior, not content: Support 18:00	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	No use of admin tools by parties in a dispute: teeny 17:59	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: we are also not paid by the hour to copy-edit discussion. 17:51	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: note re move of 3.2 struck by Jehochman. 17:47	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Questioning of administrative actions: Support 17:45	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Administrators not to act unless uninvolved: Support. Discuss bogus anti-recusal argument, often raised, probably needs some clear statement showing why it's bogus. 17:18	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist dispute resolved: not accurate in substance. only technically. 17:05	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Loci of dispute: Jehochman's request is reasonable. 16:53	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist is for spam: Support. Jehochman invited to cite policy he claims is being changed. 16:32	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's use of the spam blacklist: clarify re "MediaWiki" 16:28	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG's use of the spam blacklist: Support and comment 16:21	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Prior admonition: Support and comment on finding of prior admonition. 16:04	05-03-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	JzG not an uninvolved administrator with respect to cold fusion: the links removed were not spam, nor were they vandalism. 15:37	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	What I do on Wikipedia: Here is where it goes! 15:36	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: wrong section! 15:35	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: propitiating the Durova its/it's demon. 15:34	05-03-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: thoughts on the dispute resolution proposal Coppertwig made. 15:25	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Lecture by Robert Duncan: about the lecture and implications 15:05	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: yes, there were controls. 13:40	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Storms material.: problem is that the alleged "mainstream" appears to be clinically dead, by the peer-reviewed publication meter. 03:53	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Storms material.: Note Hipocrite's removal of the section 03:03	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Storms material.: see above. 03:02	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: note 00:55	05-03-09		User talk:Jehochman	But, of course.: comment on the SA alleged block evasion. 00:38	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	How much weight for Storms book?: reply 00:24	05-03-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Storms material.: new section 23:45	05-02-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 287536726 by Olorinish (talk)Could I summarize this in one paragraph? No. You are welcome to try. 23:42	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: fmt 23:35	05-02-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: ce 23:34	05-02-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	normally requires at least two editors to blacklist: I guess I didn't dot my i's and cross my t's. 23:24	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Undid revision 287538613 by Abd (talk)oops! wrong section! 23:21	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed remedies: collapse unused sections 23:18	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed principles: extend comment, respond to Beetstra 22:11	05-02-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: Thanks. NCMV. I'll drop an archive template on this. If I'd done this yesterday, you wouldn't have wasted your time. 21:03	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	NPOV - Undue: only "great wrong" I'm interested in is the possibility of an unbalanced article in terms of what's in the sources. 20:50	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: ce 20:49	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: wow! there actually is a "radiodurans" 20:45	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Living organisms?: pretty far out, eh? 19:57	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	What I do on Wikipedia: add qualification 19:49	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: my, what this led to..... new section, What I do on Wikipedia. 19:04	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	No use of admin tools by parties in a dispute: Agreed. Jehochman, eh? What? 18:55	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Content policies are enforced by editors: Agreed 18:54	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Dispute resolution is not for punishment: Agree. Note that desysopping is not punitive, it's purely protective (properly). The issue is possible future behavior, predicted from past and present. 18:49	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: widely held views can be dead wrong. The real question is what happens when the views are carefully examined. to find genuine consensus. 18:42	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: is threaded response by non-parties in the Comment by parties section allowed? Do we need to wait for clerks to fix this? Guidance, please! 18:36	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposed principles: ce 18:35	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposals by User:Z: I think is where it goes. 18:32	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Proposals by Abd: remove, this is in totally wrong place, will place below. 18:30	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Template: title it! 18:28	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Template: added "struck" qualification below but not here. 18:27	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: add proposal 16:58	05-02-09		Cold fusion	Challenges: cite that particular conclusion. 16:56	05-02-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: add reference for this material., organize the section better. 16:49	05-02-09		Cold fusion	Proposed explanations: Begin with detailed coverage of theory from Storms (2007), who approaches theory in a very organized way. 16:44	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: about COI and summarization: No. 16:41	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: I can do it, all right. 15:17	05-02-09		Cold fusion	again removing POV tag. Do not replace tag without specific discussion shortly after removal of such a tag by consensus 15:01	05-02-09		MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist	lenr-canr.org: request link to early Martin Fleischmann paper. 13:59	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: Yes, the original neutron findings were widely criticized, and they were retracted and never confirmed (at those high levels). 13:37	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sourcing: attribute self-published material, it's essential. 13:28	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	Summarizing: Damn! you're good at that! 13:20	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: collapse most moot argument. Request acceptance would have had to be timely to be of much service. 13:04	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Spam blacklist: add expanded version that reflects actual and proper practice. Refactor my prior comments and add justification for 3.2 12:35	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Policy and point of view: maybe there is a baby in this bathwater 12:16	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: missed one 12:15	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: fmt 12:13	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Request to narrow initial focus: respond to NYB 12:01	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Long, rambling messages: the long and the short of it. 01:59	05-02-09		User talk:Olorinish	Thanks.: new section) (top) [rollback]	 01:24	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Removal of Park book: Thanks for the link to today's blog by Park.	 01:14	05-02-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Hipocrite's removal: too bad, not.	 01:03	05-02-09		Talk:Cold fusion	NPOV - Undue: why I reverted Hipocrite's removal.	 00:56	05-02-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 287302392 by Hipocrite (talk)KB made no such suggestion. Don't remove sourced text without consensus. 00:35	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Evidence presented by Abd: other matters. 00:31	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG refused to acknowledge involvement or to recuse: ce 00:28	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): remove discussion of evidence 00:26	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Protected page edited (Spam-blacklist): reword per Beetstra comments 00:22	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG has not shown the civility expected of administrators 00:21	05-02-09		User talk:Abd	The scope of the ArbCom Case: thanks, I'll be working on it. 00:05	05-02-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	JzG long refused to acknowledge involvement or to recuse: fill out this section. 23:00	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	Undid revision 287343493 by Hipocrite (talk)remove trolling. 22:57	05-01-09		User talk:Hipocrite	Mentioned you at AN/I: new section 22:54	05-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: pinged both clerks. 22:50	05-01-09		User talk:Hmwith	Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: fix link 22:49	05-01-09		User talk:Hersfold	Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: fix link 22:48	05-01-09		User talk:Hersfold	Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: new section 22:48	05-01-09		User talk:Hmwith	Hipocrite at RfAr:Abd and JzG: new section 22:38	05-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: okay. 22:34	05-01-09		Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement	Viridae: note frivolous request by frequent AE disruptor. Also move Jehochman comment, I believe it was in the wrong section. 22:23	05-01-09		Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents	Hipocrite removing and distorting Talk page discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop: new section 22:08	05-01-09		Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Workshop	Undid revision 287252967 by Hipocrite (talk) I don't think this removal by Hipocrite was proper. He can strike his proposal, but not remove comments of others. 22:03	05-01-09		Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence	Response of Abd to TenOfAllTrades Evidence.: don't edit my Talk page comments, Hipocrite. 21:55	05-01-09		User talk:Literaturegeek	It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: demonstrate collapse box 18:53	05-01-09		User talk:Jmh649	Post at WP:WQA: suggestion 18:48	05-01-09		User talk:Nja247	ADHD: Your removal of my comment was okay, Nja. So was the replacement by Bwilkins.... toss-up. Thanks. 18:26	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	WQA discussion: weird coincidence 16:45	05-01-09		Wikiquette alerts	Scuro and editors generally: how about accepting the commitment, Doc James? (even if you already have!) 16:33	05-01-09		Wikiquette alerts	Scuro and editors generally: speak of the devil. 16:10	05-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	show paper. 16:04	05-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sourcing: cite prior discussion and actual edit placing the source. 15:50	05-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	Sourcing: r to Hipocrite and Verbal. 15:44	05-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	NPOV - Undue: explain removal of POV tag 15:38	05-01-09		Cold fusion	remove npov tag, added with inadequate specificity of complaint in Talk, shortly after being removed with general acceptance. 15:37	05-01-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 287265035 by Abd (talk)reverse my decision, will discuss in Talk or improve sourcing. 15:35	05-01-09		Cold fusion	Undid revision 287257320 by Hipocrite (talk)This source has been accepted by consensus. Seek Talk consensus before removal. 15:30	05-01-09		Talk:Cold fusion	NPOV - Undue: a spade is a spade, but I won't name it other than that. 15:22	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	Beantwo: sp 15:21	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	Beantwo: I've reverted my edit per your apparent consent to removal of the notice, nja247. 15:20	05-01-09		User talk:Beantwo	Undid revision 287261179 by Abd (talk)revert self, apparently nja247 consents to removal.) (top) [rollback]	 15:13	05-01-09		User talk:Beantwo	Undid revision 287159084 by Beeblebrox (talk)revert SSP notice back in, removed in error.	 15:03	05-01-09		Wikiquette alerts	Scuro and editors generally: comment	 14:52	05-01-09		User talk:Scuro	May 2009: self-revert	 14:51	05-01-09		User talk:Scuro	May 2009: respond to request to not use Talk page, acknowledging, will self-revert. 14:46	05-01-09		User talk:Literaturegeek	It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: not an accident, don't do it. 14:36	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	Barnstar: fix error 14:34	05-01-09		User talk:Abd	ADHD: advice. 11:15	05-01-09		User talk:Scuro	May 2009: follow DR, Scuro. It works. It means that you don't carry on a dispute all by your lonesome, beyond the first steps. 11:03	05-01-09		User talk:Literaturegeek	It's a huge no-no to revert talk page posts on wiki: reinforce warning.