User:Abdmohsin08/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Resistbot

 * All information presented in the article is relevant to the article topic. The author analyses Resistbot from various scopes and ensures that all the points link back to the subject.
 * The article appears to be neutral, as despite the fact that many positives are highlighted about the service, the alternative perspective is analyzed as well through the 'criticisms and challenges' section.
 * I feel that the viewpoints about the success of the service, as well as its shortcomings are underrepresented. On the other hand, I believe the viewpoints about its marketability are overrepresented.
 * The links for the citations do in fact work and moreover, they support the claims referenced in the article (e.g. the increase in turnout in the 2019 election as a result of resistbot)
 * Each fact is referenced with an appropriate reference. For the most part, the information comes from credible sources such as academic journals and research studies. However, there are instances of bias, such as when an article was referenced from the Resistbot website itself. This could arguably be seen as bias, as the service is presenting its own fact to portray themselves in the best light.
 * Given that the service was created just 4 years ago, none of the information is out of date yet. However, there is potential that the information may become outdated come the next presidential election.
 * The Talk page has just one comment, which suggests that the author adds more the company's history, founder and functionality.
 * The article is a part of WikiProjects but has not yet received any ratings.
 * Wikipedia focuses more on the founding and success of this particular civic tech service, whereas in class we focus more on the holistic effects of the use of civic tech on society.
 * Talk:Resistbot