User:Abdulaziz alkhazam/sandbox

Grammatical Gender

The Grammatical Gender topic is the question of present interest for grammar investigation. Speaking about the importance of the subject, Wikipedia states that the article is the result of the practical participation and teamwork. WikiProject Linguistics reviewed and explored issues about updates grammatical cases. For instance, the material "Grammatical gender" has been graded as C-Class according to the quality scale of WikiProject article quality grading scheme. It denotes that the content is fundamental referring to reliable sources. However, some facts are still inappropriate. Therefore, it requires a considerable cleanup with related request and discussions. The general reader will find this article useful. Instead, the content will not be helpful for a more specific survey. Moreover, C-Class articles must be edited with the final cleanup: orthography, spelling, page layout, and references. Thus, it will simplify the study for any scholar.

The comments below the article are not numerous. Besides, some of them have out-of-date data. Wikipedia recommends IP users to register for having a separate account. This option will prevent further confusions with IP users. Besides, the comments refer to pages that no longer exist. Notably, the major issues discussed in comments were data discrepancy or partial disorder of some detailed description. Users emphasized that the information was given from two different topics and must be separated.

The discussion in comments is based mainly on two issues. One part of members marked that “noun class” should be separated from “gender,” whereas the opponents offered the distinction due to the low connection between two issues. Hence, the resolution is evident: these two topics are closely related, but they require a further collaboration. Therefore, the separation of two essential points and publishing them on different pages will be fallacies of definition.

It is only a slight overstatement to say that grammatical gender is nothing more than noun classes as mentioned in comments. Grammatical gender categories are related to biological sex within a particular semantic aspect. It is doubtless that disagreements are in every language, namely, regarding masculine and feminine classes.

The article refers to the noun inflection issue as well as to the noun categories. The detailed division of a noun to masculine, feminine, neuter, animate, inanimate, and common draws the whole picture of the grammar gender system. Though the C-Class requires additional efforts in order of the entire material, I found this article a considerably fundamental. In this case, I cannot accept the position of a user who offered to move the information from “Noun class” page to “Grammatical gender.” Thus, all the data should be synchronized.

My sense of the discussion is not in progressively stronger statements because I think “noun classes” are closely connected with “grammatical gender” specifically eliminated in the article. Referring to the collaborating materials, I agree with the opinion that the grammatical gender of a noun affects the form of related words. Besides, referring to many other languages, gender is correlated with a primary unmodified form of the noun. Occasionally, a noun can be modified to form masculine and feminine words. In particular, there is an example of adjectives and pronouns in foreign languages, mainly in Italian or Spanish, that change their form according to the noun. Subsequently, the example of Spanish words represents feminine and masculine nouns: “chica” and “chico,” “salsera” and “salsero.”