User:AbedxD/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Clinical physiology - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because I am interested in medical concepts such the one this Wikipedia article is about "Clinical Physiology", and I care about serving the public audience with a well weaved and clear explanation of them. So, I will try my best to fix this article to attain that.

Evaluate the article
1) Lead Section:

. The first sentence in the Lead Section perfectly states the topic of the article, where anyone that reads it will know that the article is going to discuss "Clinical Physiology" and explain it.

. It does not contain a brief explanation of the article's main sections

. It is overly detailed, where it contains a somehow deep explanation of Clinical Physiology that does not fit into an introduction, a part of it should be put as a separate section.

2) Content

. The article's content is relevant to the topic

. The content is somehow old, around 12 years old, yet no information disagrees the sources cited.

.In general, the content of the article is fairly enough to discuss the concept of Clinical Physiology, and I dont think that there is something more to add

3) Tone and Balance

. The author's tone throughout the article is neutral and way too far from including any of his opinions or point of views regarding the topic. Note that originally the topic of the article is purely scientific and there is nearly null space to include any personal ideas.

4) Sources and References

. Most of the information stated in the artcle are backed up with sources, except for some that are left with no sources

. Most of the sources included in the article are old ones, around 12 years old.

. The sources, except for the fact they are not new, are good and reliable.

. Regarding the links, all of them are working, but it is possible to add a few more links.

5) Organization and Writing Quality

. The article had some grammatical mistakes

. A portion of the Lead Section was required to be split as a separate section.

. Remaining sections of the articles are fine.

6) Images and Media

. There are no images present in this article

7) Overall Impressions

. The article strength is that it contains nearly all available information present on the internet combined in a single article

. Some improvements that should be done are grammatical corrections, sentences' structures enhancements, and adding some extra links.