User:Abelsenti/DeepDream/Jorgevizcarrondo Peer Review

General info

 * User: Abelsenti
 * DeepDream

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has a brief, but very well written description of what DeepDream is. It has attention grabbing qualities that make the audience interested to oread more, and it also explains the origination of the computer vision program. Overall, the lead was as much as you could ask for.

Content

 * All the content given was very well written. Was a very easy read, which is difficult when explaining such a complex computer program. As I could see, all the information was up to date. The author gave a well needed history check, and after that the information began flowing. In my opinion, the topic of discuss is extremely interesting, and should be spoken about much more. The author shoed no signed of being bias, and simply reiterated important information regarding the subject. Not at any moment was the author off track, and I really enjoyed reading this article.

Tone and Balance

 * The author never had any preferences throughout the article, and was very neutral. Absolutely, no signs or claims to be heavily biased, whatsoever. The article was very balanced and everything was presented very well. As the audience, I was not persuaded in any way. I was simply presented information, and no position was represented.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All sources and references looked up to date, and credible. Whenever credit must had been given, the author always cited the needed information. There were many hyperlinks to words that may not be usual to readers who have never heard of DeepDream, and that was very helpful when reading. The links I cheeped all worked, and were all reliable sources.

Organization

 * To be completely honest, I will take this page and review it many times after this peer review, due to the organization. I really enjoyed reading content, and immediately being able to see it in an image. It made it so much easier to understand what DeepDream was trying to accomplish. Organization throughout the entire article was very well done, resulting in an easier read.

Images and Media

 * The images were what really got me to fully understand the topic. For example, I was somewhat confused at the beginning, but after looking and observing each picture I was able to understand what the author was trying to say. That is not to knock off the written context, I believe it was described perfectly. But the images perfectly complimented the written content. Also, the picture placement was very well done. Help understanding the content much easier.

Overall impressions

 * To be honest, I was really impressed on what I read. It was written very well, and I was never bored or uninterested. The author made the subject very attractive to the audience, even if you aren't well educated on scientific studies such as DeepDream. The main point I wanted to discuss, was the pictures. They were really what put everything together. When solely looking at the pictures, you are somewhat confused. When solely reading the content, you are somewhat confused. The author perfectly complimented the article by the placement of the pictures, and the ones that were chosen. After reading this article I have a very good understanding of what DeepDream is about, and what they are trying to accomplish. Very good work.