User:Abelsenti/DeepDream/Nivekt12 Peer Review

Peer review
User:Abelsenti

Draft: User:Abelsenti/DeepDream

Content:

I think the contributions made by User:Abelsenti are very well worded and relevant to the original article. I had no idea what Deep Dream was but after reading much of the original article, I got understood the premise of the topic quite well. After checking the user's sandbox to see which specific contributions were made by them, I was surprised and impressed by the fact that one of the most informative sections was the one written in the sandbox.

The details I enjoyed the most from the contribution was the language utilized and the consistent links to complex phrases that perhaps needed some elaboration. The vocabulary was very sophisticated giving the article a very mature nature. The language used also lacked opinionated diction, which is a hige positive when it comes to any article written in wikipedia. Another aspect I plan to implement to my article contribution was the links giving further explanation to the more complex terms. It made the article much easier to understand when words like Backpropagation and pareidolia were linked to definitions. Overall, this was great work!