User:Abelsenti/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: DeepDream
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * It relates to my TIMOB.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Some info, yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is pretty concise, only 2 sentences.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, all content is relevant.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Considering this is a pretty recent article, it is quite up to date. Last edit was March 30th.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, all content present is relevant.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, it only presents the information, does not promote it.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * Not really...

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, for a quite short article, it has many references.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes. Sources are extremely in depth and cover everything.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, most are very recent.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, I checked all the links and they work perfectly.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * It is concise, easy to read and well organized.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, it does not.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, while I feel that there could be more sub heading, it is still well-organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions

The pictures are visually pleasing, and placed in a way that does not distract the reader. They are well-captioned and the captions on them make it easy to know exactly what is going on in the picture.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, and the pictures are very cool too.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes, all link to a page with content creator's information.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes, the page is visually appealing.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * They talk about how this page only refers to google's works.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Start-class
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * It is well-organized and concise.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * I feel that a little more content can be added.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * It is well-developed.
 * It is well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback:Talk:DeepDream