User:Abnerndabad/Polyketide/Chunshengyan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Abnerndabad


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Abnerndabad/Polyketide


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Polyketide

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * ·        The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic. Add one more sentence for description than the existing article.
 * ·        The lead only covers a definition of the topic but not a brief description of the article’s major sections.
 * ·        The lead is concise.

Content:


 * ·        The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date.
 * ·        The subclass section needs more detailed information. Some parts of the article are directly form the existing article.
 * ·        The content can be more organized into different sections.

Source and References:


 * ·        The information provided is from reliable secondary source of information.
 * ·        The article keeps almost all information from the existing article, but not keep all the sources used by the existing article.
 * ·        The content accurately reflects what the cited source says.
 * ·        I would suggest looking for more sources about the specific examples for the application.
 * ·        The links all work.

Organization:

·        The content is well written and concise.

Images and Media:

·        Need to add more images to show the examples.

Overall impression:


 * ·        The content added helps explain the topic.
 * ·        More details about the examples would be better.