User:Abrianne39/Rumex floridanus/E.h.elhag Peer Review

General info

 * Abrianne39
 * Rumex floridanus

Lead evaluation
The lead has been updated and cited properly by the author of this article. It clearly and concisely describes the plant species being discussed in this article. There is no information that is not further discussed in the article. It is very concise. I would suggest adding another sentence or so briefly about the plant species.

Content evaluation
The content is all relevant to the species being discussed and is adequately illustrated for readers. The content all seems to be up to date and relevant. There is no content missing however I suggest adding a little more content in areas such as distribution (discuss the general type of environment the species grows adequately in).

Tone and balance evaluation
The content is neutral and does not take any sides. It is all objective content in this article and it does not seek to persuade the reader on any side.

Sources and references evaluation
All sources are thorough, current and all the links provided do work.

Organization evaluation
It is very well written. Every section speaks on solely the information pertaining to that specific section and there is no overlap in information. There are no known grammatical or spelling errors found.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The article is a great start. The strengths of the content are the adequate sectioning of the information as well as organization in the way the species of the plant was introduced. I believe there is just a need for a little more information on the article as discussed above in the content evaluation.