User:AcademicWeapon05/Thioxtropy1/Slownotdumb Peer Review

General info
cademicWeapon05
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AcademicWeapon05/Thioxtropy1
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Thixotropy

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

No changes to the lead have been made, however it is fine how it is.

Content:

Yes, the content added is up to date and relevant to the topic. Content added includes: History, methods of usage, uses today, and negative effects. I could not think of any missing info, so no there is no missing info.

Tone and Balance:

The information is not biased, it is neutral and informative. The tone and balance is good.

Sources and refrences:

Yes, the content added is backed by sources, and there are links to show it. They are good sources.

Organization:

The content added is nicely written, it is clear and concise. Also, the content added is broken into sections such as history, uses today, and negative effects.

Overall Impressions:

My overall impressions of this draft are good. It is well written, clear, relevant, and of valuable information.