User:Acaebow1/Dogs in religion/Brittanyhchan Peer Review

General info
Acaebow1 - "Dogs in Religion"
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Acaebow1/Dogs in religion
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dogs in religion

Evaluate the drafted changes
From the introduction, your article is already off to a good start. You have written an interesting lead and you were able to cover the importance of the subject so you did well on being concise in your writing.

For the content of your draft, they will definitely expound more about the importance of dogs in different religions. By adding to these sections, you are balancing each section to make them all the same length and providing an even amount of information on them. Moreover, you were able to cite your sources which is inline with Wikipedia's expectations of not plagiarizing the work of others. I think that you can omit some introductory tags when introducing the sources as they can make your article unnecessarily long.

For the tone of your article, you did a great job writing objectively. I recommend trying similar sections to be of similar lengths to show that these sections are all equally accounted for. The flow of your article is smooth and well-written. I believe that you can improve the flow through the use of transitions. But overall, you have written in a way that will allow your readers to easily understand the point of your article.

At this point, your article holds a lot of potential to become an informative source. A point of improvement is to be more specific with the title of your sections so the readers know what it will be about and will see its relevance to the article as a whole.