User:Acarlquist001/sandbox

Article Evaluation
1.Everything in the peer review article covers the topic.

2. The article is neutral and also describing how peer review is commonly used in any field of work.

3. No i think the the view points are represented well.

4. The links do work for the citations. Also they support the claims in the article.

5.  All the references are reliable, and most of them come from universities.

6. A lot of the sources are old, so there could be some updates ones. The most update one is from 2002.

7. I could not find out how the article rated.

8. They set up their material a different way and also use more direct citations. So they need to make sure to cite there references.