User:Acarmichael417/Evaluate an Article

Wikipedia page: Cnidariology. I chose this article because there was not a lot of information on it and it shocked me.

Lead Section

The lead section was a very brief, one sentence description of what a cnidarianologist is. There are only two links connecting to other Wikipedia articles. It does include a brief description of pertinent information, but needs a lot of attention.

Content and Overall Impressions

There were links to external sources when different cnidarianologists are mentioned, but that is the only content on the page. Overall, this page needs extensive work.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)