User:Accerniglia/sandbox

Adding Sources:
Correction with new article

Title: Vegaphobia

-Recognition of the vegaphobia phenomenon since 21st century

 -First Source: 

(insert text from article here): "It is in the 21st that it began to frame the phenomenon in the sociological sphere and makes its appearance "vegaphobia". In 2007, a survey called "Vegaphobia: disproportionate talk about veganism in British national newspapers" took place in the United Kingdom, which examined 397 articles containing the terms "vegan", "vegans" and "veganism". That's what the researchers found was that 74.3% of the items are classified as "negatives"; 20.2% "neutral" and only 5.5% "positive". Negative items were in order of frequency: ridiculing veganism; characterize veganism as asceticism; affirming that veganism is difficult or impossible to sustain; describe veganism as a fashion; portray vegans as sentimentalists; defining vegans as hostile. [11]"

(insert reference to source here in plain text): The British Journal of Sociology

(insert excerpt from source here): In a survey, it was found many people associate the terms "vegan", "vegans", and "veganism" as mostly negative. This is problematic in many ways. First, the fact that just those words are considered negative, already demeans people who classify as one of those three terms. If those terms have a negative connotation, that already diminishes any first impression of someone who classifies themselves as a vegan. Secondly, this pessimistic view portrays vegans as antagonistics and also brands veganism in a misrepresentative way. Lastly, it misinterprets the relationship between human and nonhuman animals in an unethical way, ultimately degrading veganism as a whole.

Cole, Matthew and Karen Morgan. "Vegaphobia: Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK National Newspapers." British Journal of

Sociology, vol.62, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 134-153. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01348.x.

 -Second Source: 

(insert text from article here): Laura Wright makes the case that media organisations and wider discourse routinely mischaracterise vegan diets and highlights situations where media outlets report the death of children from a 'vegan diet' rather than the neglect that was the actual cause. [5] . However, Christophe Traïni writes that some vegan activists may present themselves 'as members of an oppressed minority rebelling against ‘vegephobia’'

(insert reference to source here in plain text): Laura Wright

(insert excerpt from source here): [5] Many people disregard the valid reason women and others choose to have vegetarian or vegan diets and they are looked at as having harsh diet with many restrains. The neglect to understand the thought behind vegetarian or vegan diets have led vegetarian and vegan women have a negative status when judged upon their diet. This outlook has caused women who choose to have a vegetarian or vegan diet to be misunderstood and interpreted in the wrong way.

Citation:

Laura, Wright and Adams Carol J. Chapter 4 Death by Veganism, Veganorexia, and Vegaphobia: Women, Choice, and the Politics of Disordered Eating. The Vegan Studies Project : Food, Animals, and Gender in the Age of Terror, University of Georgia Press, 2015. EBSCOhost, libezp.lib.lsu.edu/login?url= https://search-ebscohost-com.libezp.lib.lsu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edspmu&AN=edspmu.MUSE9780820348544.11&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=eds-main.

 Lead: 

Title: CIA activities in Colombia

Colombia is borderline of the northwest by Panama and the east of Venezuela and Brazil, located to the to south by Ecuador and Peru; through seven agreements on the Caribbean Sea and three agreements on the Pacific Ocean, it has established its boundaries with neighboring countries. The country of Colombia, like many countries, faces many issues with crime. Through the years, Colombia has cracked down and advanced, stopping all the crime that they can. Colombia has advanced through solving crimes consisting of drug trafficking, drug cultivation, and political violence. From the years of 1991 to 2008, Colombia's CIA has improved and advanced through the evolution of these crimes.

Corrected Lead:

The Central Intelligence Agency focuses on fighting two major conflicts of the cultivation and trafficking of cocaine and the local extremist groups in Colombia. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, otherwise known as the FARC, is one of the main extremist groups in Colombia. The FARC has resulted in the killings of innocent civilians making them a top priority for the CIA. The CIA activities revolve heavily around stopping the production of cocaine and the FARC. Evraziatskii Entomologicheskii Zhurnal, vol. 11, no. 3, n.d., pp. 249-260. EBSCOhost, libezp.lib.lsu.edu/login?url=https://search- ebscohost-com.libezp.lib.lsu.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=boh&AN=BACD201300102291&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=eds-main.