User:Acheermann/Cyberbullying/Ssblee98 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Samanthahuckstep19)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Cyberbullying

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Added content as well as sources to the article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes the content was neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? It is neither over represented nor underrepresented, but a little bit underrepresented on the "Trolling" part of the article
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It is persuaded to discourage cyber bullying.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all the new references were added accordingly to the content added
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? It is a bit dated, from 2010, however it is reliable.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It was very concise and clear.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, they were added in the correct sections, well-organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Did not add new images.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? It is not necessarily improved the overall quality of the article since he/she has done few revisions and few additional information in different parts of the article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The TED Talks from Ashley Judd about how online abuse of women has spiraled out of control.
 * How can the content added be improved? More precise details and different wording.