User:Aconitum napellus/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Euphorbia candelabrum
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I chose to evaluate this article because a classmate had suggested that it was a page that needed more editing. Upon discovering the page, there was barely any information and I was determined to update it. After reading multiple papers I was quite surprised by how interesting this plant was to read about and I hope more people stumble upon the Euphorbia candelabrum page!

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise lead, only a few paragraphs

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, many.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Not many, this is a plant that isn't frequently discussed.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is currently rated as a stub-class article that needs more views and content.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? We haven't discussed this plant in class but perhaps the effects of climate change could be discussed more.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Stub-class
 * What are the article's strengths? Details about medicinal use.
 * How can the article be improved? More details about its ecology and industrial uses.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Decently developed, could use more work.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk:Euphorbia candelabrum