User:Ad45465/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
String Quartets, Op. 33 (Haydn)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Preparation for class project

Evaluate the article
The article has a strong lead section. In the content sections, the information provided was succinct and helpful, but a bit imbalanced. For example, the fourth movement of Op. 33 No. 2 gets a full 3 paragraphs of information while some other portions of the article have only one basic sentence (such as the remark about Op. 33 No. 1 playing with D Major before settling in b minor). I think it would also be helpful to unify the information by addressing a few key points for each quartet. Instead of mentioning key in one, form in another, nicknames in another, etc., I think it may be helpful to choose the most important points and touch on them in each quartet, or if each of the quartets except one or two shares a certain similar feature, to also make a pattern of pointing that similarity or difference out (i.e., all of the quartets except xyz share this formal feature). The writing and use of score images were professional and useful, and the sources seemed reliable. I did not note a whole lot of commentary on the talk page, so I do not believe this article is regularly expanded or edited. What commentary I did see there mostly pertained to the information imbalance I mention earlier as well as the validity and inclusion of all referenced sources.