User:Adahl5/Amphitheatre of Pompeii/Kvanval2 Peer Review

Lead- No lead here only new information

Content- It is relevant to the topic and up to date. I believe the content is good that have been given.

Tone and balance- the content is neutral, the tone isn't biased either

Sources- There are 6 sources and they all seem to be good sources giving non biased information. They all work too.

Organization- The new data was added into a few spots in the article and some made new spots.

Images- no new images

Overall- The information that was added to knowing about the amphitheater was that there was events like hunting and competitions, that there is a fresco of a gladiators fate. It was also one of the earliest amphitheaters. The information is nice non biased and short. I think it was a good job to added this new information.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)