User:Adahl5/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title: :Amphitheatre of Pompeii
 * Article Evaluation: :The introduction does concisely talk about what the article's topic is. It's not over detailed but it does not does not reference what the major sections are going to be. The content does appear to be up to date and it's about the topic, however, I do not think the earthquake section is necessary to be alone. The article is written in a neutral tone, there isn't persuasion to feel a certain way. The sources seem to be up to date and about the topic. The article is organization is fine, same with the images. There is not a lot in the talk page, it was a part of a supported class project.
 * Sources:https://uwyo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_springer_books_10_1007_978_3_319_00143_2_36&context=PC&vid=01UOW_INST:quicksearch&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,amphitheatre%20of%20pompeii&offset=0:

Option 2

 * Article title: :Jali
 * Article Evaluation: :Introduction talks about what the topic is. The introduction seems to include a lot of details and information before the first section however. The content is up to date and about the topic, and is written well and concisely. It is written in a neutral tone and does not try to convince the reader the think a certain way. The sources seem up to date, and are about the topic. The organization is professional and concise. The images are handled well, and under the guidelines of Wikipedia. There is little in the talk section of the article.
 * Sources:https://sites.psu.edu/perforatedscreendesigner/history-of-jalis-in-indian-architecture/

Option 3

 * Article title: :Lessay Abbey
 * Article Evaluation: :Introduction opens up and talks about the topic. It does give a brief intro into the rest of the article. The content is relevant to the topic and it is up to date. It is also written in a neutral tone, and is not trying to persuade the reader to think in a certain way. The sources appear to be working, up to date, and relevant to the topic. The organization is clear and concise, and the writing is good. The images are dealt with in the manner of the Wikipedia guidelines. There is nothing in the talk page.
 * Sources:https://uwyo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_journals_1562375924&context=PC&vid=01UOW_INST:quicksearch&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Lessay%20Abbey&offset=0

Option 4

 * Article title: :San Cristoforo
 * Article Evaluation: :The introduction opens up about the topic, but it doesn't have any reference to what's going to be in the article. The content appears to be up to date, and doesn't have something that shouldn't be there. The article is written in a neutral tone and is not trying to convince the reader to think a certain way. The sources seem to be up to date and are relevant to the topic. The organization makes sense and is professional. The images are handled as they should be under Wikipedia guidelines. There is no talk page, but is in the scope of the WikiProject Italy.0
 * Sources:https://uwyo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_jstor_primary_26846337&context=PC&vid=01UOW_INST:quicksearch&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,San%20Cristoforo&offset=0