User:Adam conlon/Minimum wage/Chiqueno Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Adam Colon
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Adam conlon/Minimum wage

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
N/A

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Yes, adding relative minimum wage to the existing article is a good section. The content itself is more of a bulleted list without much depth into the concept itself or what it currently is in the country. It may steer into some controversial topics with policy implications about raising and lowering minimum wage and the standard of living. Other than that the basics were there.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
It's neutral except the ending, which is more of a call to action with what to do with minimum wage.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
There seems to be only two sources listed, and one is from 1981. I'm not sure how relevant this source is considering you used income data in the article. Conceptually both the articles seem like good sources to explain what relative minimum wage is.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
You should probably add more than just one reference point at the end of the paragraph. The paragraph is also choppy and doesn't flow sentence to sentence but rather a bunch of points made. It does do a good job in the fact that it explains what relative mimic wage is, state the numeric of it and then branch into detail. Maybe break it into a few paragraphs if you add detail.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
The basic information on relative minimum wage is there but it appears more depth or ideas around it need be introduced that aren't as controversial.