User:Adam conlon/Minimum wage/Osa225 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Adam Conlon
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Adam conlon/Minimum wage

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? There is no heading.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?It does have an introductory sentence.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?It is not divided into different sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? There is but it is confusing because it is not divided into specific sections.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? There could be more information on the topic.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? It is relevant.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? One of the source is old so I don't know how relevant the data is.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?There could be more information about why minimum wage does not increase unemployment.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There are no biased toward a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it does not persuade readers.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, there needs to be more sources and also put in correctly on the Wikipedia format.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?No, there could be more literature on the topic.
 * Are the sources current? One of the source is almost 40 years old so the information is not relevant.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? There's no links.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is well written but explanations can be expanded more.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There are some grammatical issues with punctuation. Some sentences can be combined.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No, it needs to be divided into different sections.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? NA
 * Are images well-captioned?NA
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?NA
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?NA

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No, there needs to be more articles and one of them should not be use.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? No
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?No, it needs to be put into the Wikipedia format.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? It needs to be expanded with more research about the topic.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? If you can expand more about relative minimum wage it can improve the overall quality of your article.
 * How can the content added be improved? It can be improve by adding more sources. You should also divide your article into different sections because it will help the reader understand what the topic you are talking about. I recommend putting more research and content to make it more acceptable.