User:Adam micro/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Amoeba

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I just have a genuine interest in amoeba.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The content was relevant for the topic. The tone of the article was neutral given no view point was over or under presented. The only real concern I had was in the sources, I saw the use of the way back machine was cited. I have never heard of this site, so I did more digging on the website digital archive of the world wide web. I'm not saying the information given on the website is wrong, but there are better choices to cite the information from. It does not state that the information you are getting has even been peer reviewed. The other sources I looked into were much more reliable given they used Pubmed and other reliable sites to gain their information that they presented. My overall impression of the article was that it has the ability to give a good amount of information on the topics of amoeba but not bear down on small finite details.