User:Adambiswanger1/Archive 4

Thanks
Thanks for your response and willingness to help out. Now I understand better why the articles were removed despite the offer I saw at the tail end of the Discussion for you and others to clean things up.

I think 95% of the "weasel word" claims are probably simply unsourced assertions made in the various readings which sadly never got documented in Wikipedia as opposed to students weighing in with their guesses about public opinion etc. I've got many other To Do's but will try in the mid to late September timeframe to systematically devote an hour or so a week on this, so if it's reasonable to somehow red-flag sentences that you otherwise would delete because they are unsourced (e.g., put in brackets with a boldfaced conoverc at the beginning so I can quickly spot these?) that might be the most efficient use of everyone's time. Anyway, sorry I myself couldn't do a better job as master editor on these. I essentially lost my TA mid-semester and it was a scramble just to keep up with the course. Best wishes, Chris Conover

JNW

More thanks
Thanks for your welcome (26 August). I've been slow responding, but it was good to receive it.

Best wishes, Rwb001 05:39, 15 October 2006 (UTC)]]

Hi Adambiswanger1, and thank you for your kind welcome. I look forward to making some small contribution, via editing a few artist's biographies. Very best of luck on all your endeavors!

--JNW 18:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

RfA oppose pile ups
I like your defence of that Oppose pileup, maybe you could change to support as it doesn't seem to be detering anyone.-- Andeh 22:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yea I think its a good idea, but I don't want to seem like I'm babying the guy. 2 moral supports is fine, but if we all did it might seem a bit cheesy.  Also, I think the oppose votes have stopped.  I'm glad you are on the side of consideration as well : ) AdamBiswanger1 22:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Interwikis
I got a lot of work collecting all interwikis for the Welcome template. But is nice to seem all of them. I forgot some from sister projects: q:Template:Welcome wikt:Template:welcome b:Template:Welcome n:Template:Hello s:Template:Welcome wikispecies:Template:Welcome commons:Template:Welcome m:Template:MediaWiki Welcome mw:Template:MediaWiki Welcome

Now i think we got 99% of interwikis :-) Add them to the template. Thanks. Mosca2 05:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Edits
Fascinating. Thanks for the tip. Best wishes,

--JNW 11:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Get an account

 * I know you're being pestered about this, but it really is a good idea to create an account--you don't even have to "log in" at all if you click "remember me" upon sign in.

Oh, like this? I think I'm going to ignore that particular rule for now. Maybe when the Forces of Evil ruin WP:IAR and disable anon edits entirely... ;-) -Dan 15:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well then, just keep on doin things your way. : ) AdamBiswanger1 16:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Tahirih Justice Center
Hey Adam, I've taken the article to FAC now, implementing the changes that you and others recommended. Your input there would be much appreciated! Thank you.UberCryxic 16:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello Adam. I'm back again haha! The article is still in FAC because, unfortunately, it has received little attention there. On the other hand, the attention it has received so far has been positive, with all supports so far! I would just like to kindly ask for you to review this article again if you're not too busy, this time at FAC. Thank you so much!UberCryxic 00:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

your opinion sought at WP:LIST talk
I've made a proposal here, and am seeking feedback. Best,--Anthony Krupp 14:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

List of automobiles that were commercial failures up for deletion
Hi,

You have taken part in the AfD process for List of successful automobiles and voted delete. The decision was unanimous and the article was subsequently deleted. Now a corresponding article, List of automobiles that were commercial failures, is up for deletion for the same reasons. It would be only logicial and just to have them both deleted, so I cordially invite you to take part in the new discussion.

Regards, Bravada, talk - 09:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You left a note on my (and presumably other editors) talk page referring to a prior AfD discussion on List of automobiles that were commercial failures that had occurred under another name (presumably List of automotive flops). However, I cannot find the AfD discussion for List of automotive flops. If you provide me with the link, I'd be happy to read it and reconsider my "delete" comment, if warranted. Agent 86 23:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Automobile flops
I voted to keep it from the start, dude! Drett 23:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry ! my fault AdamBiswanger1 23:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Me, I have reviewed the previous AfD—thank you for informing me of it—but do not wish to change my vote. --Scheinwerfermann 00:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

hello.
I'm sorry, but i stand by my vote on the AFD. dposse 23:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Thanks for considering the noted information AdamBiswanger1 23:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

A Medal!

 * Thank you, I'm honored. Actually, even with 6000 edits and tons of mental effort, that's my first award! AdamBiswanger1 01:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I tell ya I get no respect. AdamBiswanger1 01:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes I noticed, don't worry your collection should start building soon. ;)
 * Not going on your user page?-- Andeh 11:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fear not-- I just need to figure out the best way to arrange an "awards" section AdamBiswanger1 13:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Automotive Commercial Failures RfA
Just a quick note to say thanks for bringing the previous RfA on this topic to my attention, I hadn't noticed. At this time I'm sticking to delete but none the less I appreciate you raising it to my attention as otherwise I wouldn't have know. While seeing your user page I see you have a bit of a UK architechture fetish and it sounds as though you may study here. If you do be sure to check out Canterbury Cathedral, I think you'll find it much more impressive than salisbury Cathedral. ta, --WikipedianProlific(Talk) 01:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for considering the previous AfD. I would love to argue my point, but I've barely caught my breath from the last one, and I'm not too fond of having this article, although I'd like to see it stay.  And regarding Canterbury cathedral, I've been wanting to travel there, but I haven't been in that part of the country yet.  Strange to think that's where Thomas a Beckett was killed.  But yes, I love the architecture of England, but moreover the atmosphere in general, being from boring, homogenous America.  Winchester Cathedral is also on my list... AdamBiswanger1 02:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

list of automotive failures AfD
Sorry, but I think this list article fails at least items 1 and 2 of your own list criteria. I continue to favor deletion of the article. At best it could be a category. --Cassavau 03:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Touché AdamBiswanger1 12:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Hi
I am writing to inform you, and many others, that an AfD in which you voted delete, List of automobiles that were commercial failures, was already unsucessfully nominated a short time ago, but under a different title. This was not noted in the nomination. Please read the opposing arguments here, and reconsider your vote, because it is important that the opinions of previous voters be considered. Thanks! AdamBiswanger1 23:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Noone addressed my concern that there has to be an objective criterion that defines the list, so I see no reason to change my vote. You could say that the criterion is "must be an unprofitable automobile", but then you must provide profit figures (estimates are fine, but cite where you got them from). It seems infeasible to me because I don't know how verifiable automobile-specific profit figures are. If you can do it, good luck.  Cdcon  15:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have addressed the issue, and quite extensively--however I mistakenly gave you the wrong link, which is here. It is my contention that although the criterion is subjective, it is uncontroversial and not likely to contain examples that don't belong there.  Any gray areas can be explained--the beauty of a list.  I have seen many people argue from your viewpoint, even arguing that "Tango singers" is too subjective in List of Tango singers.  I see where you are coming from, but sometimes one has to overlook the vague criteria and realize that there is no problem with the list as it is, and will not be in the future. AdamBiswanger1 16:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The Nutcracker (in answer to your question)
In my audio CD of "The Nutcracker", featuring the St. Louis Symphony Orchestra conducted by Leonard Slatkin, each number is given a separate track. The Apotheosis is always combined with the Final Waltzin all performances, however. On the DVD of the Baryshnikov Nutcracker, however, the last ten minutes of the ballet are all lumped into one "chapter" - that includes the "Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy", the "Tarantella", the "Coda", the "Pas de Deux", and the "Final Waltz and Apotheosis". Hope this helps. Albert SM

GHe's RfA


Articles for deletion/Electronic Standard Book Number
Hehe, yeah but I was also the nominator! Computerjoe 's talk 18:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you


Thanks for reviewing me!
Thank you so very much for reviewing me. I'd like to address your concern. I don't know anything about Ben Affleck. I barely remember what he looks like most of the time, so I figured maybe it was an honest mistake or somebody experimenting. I left a test message on the vandal's userpage, but I thought it was either a mistake or a simple test, so I used test1. I've started using more "vandal" reverts very (VERY) recently. Thank you so much for taking the time to review me!!! It means a LOT to me. Have a great day! Srose (talk)  13:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

User review
First of all, thanks for reviewing me. The reason I jumped from test1 to test3 on that particular occassion was that the user had made the same (or at least a substantially similar edit) to the same article as they had been previously warned for by Tawkerbot. Given that, I felt there was no reason that the user would not already be aware that the edit was considered vandalism, and there was therefore no point in a test2 which basically states 'Please do not add nonsense/remove content. It is considered vandalism.' I'll bear your suggestions about Afd and Talkspace in mind, thanks again! Cynical 19:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Association of Members' Advocates
I've posted a reply to your comment on Wikipedia_talk:Association of Members' Advocates. I hope it helps! :-) אמר Steve Caruso ( desk / AMA / vote for me ) 00:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

You still editing Philly pages?
I wanted to see if you were still around. --evrik 03:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Still here, but I can't see myself getting too involved in philly-related articles. I'm from philly, but my talentls lie elsewhere, plus I have my own portal to maintain.  If you guys are doing anything major and you need a hand just drop me a line. AdamBiswanger1 04:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

RE: Hi
The article is entitled "Editing Portal:Poetry/Selected article archive/March 2007". If it is part of the Poetry portal, it should be "Portal:Poetry/Selected article archive/March 2007", without the word Editing at the start. As it stands, it's part of the article namespace, and not the Portal namespace. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 04:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey Adam, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. I hope I've built up some more edits in those two key areas by the time I next show up on RfA. Thanks for your opinion (!vote) :) --jam es (talk) 11:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Lists
Just to be clear: I would happily see every stand-alone list deleted and no more created. Very happily. I recognize this is unlikely to happen; however, the compromise I'm looking for is one that limits lists only to the most important and fewest possible. The Literate Engineer 03:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Portal:Poetry
Well, the general structure seems sound enough, but there are a variety of small—but jarring—formatting faults: As far as content goes, the main thing you're missing is a box listing major topics. Hope that helps! Kirill Lokshin 04:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strange blank bar above the title of the portal.
 * Thumbnail markup on images. Unless you set your background to transparent, the border around these will actually be a subtly different color.  I would suggest using hand-aligned captions (as in Portal:War/Intro).
 * The links at the bottom of boxes should all be on one line, either on opposite margins (as in Portal:History of science) or spaced with bullet points (as in Portal:Portugal).
 * Images should all be at the top of their respective boxes.
 * The "Selected image" box should have an explicit image credit.
 * There's a non-functional show/hide button in the "Categories" box, and the formatting could probably be made somewhat cleaner, with fewer concentric boxes.
 * Thanks alot for the review. I have no idea how to make the "strange blank bar" go away, but I'll work on it and all of the other suggestions you named.  Thanks again, AdamBiswanger1 04:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You still have a thumbnail in the intro. Aside from that, you've now lost the categories completely—which wasn't really a good idea—and still need to work on getting all the links at the bottom of boxes on one line. Kirill Lokshin 21:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok I put the categories back and removed the the intro, but I'm not sure what you mean by "links at the bottom of boxes on one line". AdamBiswanger1 00:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The "Read more" and "Archive" links should be on a single horizontal line. Kirill Lokshin 01:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kirill-- I finally figured it out. AdamBiswanger1 02:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

A hasty kiss
I've been planning to msg you for weeks, dear Adam - I promise I will when I'm not this sleepy :) Hugs! -- P h a e d r i e <font color="#009900">l <font color="#FF0000">♥ <font style="color:#22AA00;">tell me  - 04:28, August 13 2006 (UTC)]] Tired?  But you've only had to thank 300 people!  Dare I say that you are the most famous editor on Wikipedia?  Everyone knows who Phaedriel is, and everyone likes Phaedriel (don't worry, no sarcastic undertone).  But I digress (I do that alot).  In any event, I think your Wikipedia soundtrack is a great idea.  I think we all know that no one will read our lists (well, except yours of course), and yet we still spend many moments pondering what songs define us. It's alot of fun. Good luck with your admin duties AdamBiswanger1 04:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You'll never forgive me for that comment in Kylu's RfA, will you, hun? :( *blushes brightly, looks at the floor and shuffles her feet* Me, famous? Oh please, dear Adam... Bishonen is famous, Durin is famous, Ghirla is famous... me, I'm just another name, and happy to be just that :) and allow me to digress too... I read all entries at the Soundtrack, and you know, we have many things in common (did I list Blind Melon's No rain too? Can't recall now, but I love that song! ;) Anyway, I promise to drop by and visit you again and leave you a lenghtier message asap, k? Have a great Sunday! hugs, <font color="#00BB00">Phaedriel  <font color="#FF0000">♥  The Wiki Soundtrack! <font color="#FF0000">♪  - 05:22, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey
Hey heard from Doc Tropics at all? Æon Insane Ward 14:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunetly not--maybe he is taking a wikibreak, or he just got bored of the project AdamBiswanger1 00:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Feedback requested
At Wikipedia_talk:List_guideline Thanks! --Anthony Krupp 23:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Automotive flops
Thanks for the explanation.

''Later, the article was renamed to List of cars that were considered commercial failures, and someone else nominated it less than a month later not knowing that it was previously nominated. The result in that AfD was "delete".''

And THAT'S OKAY??

&lt;KF&gt; 23:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you-- I think I still have one left! AdamBiswanger1 12:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

opinion
As an editor of Lists of topics, I'd like your opinion at Topics redesign. Thanks. --gatoatigrado 15:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the Barnstar on Jonson (hope I'm doing this right)--User:Jlittlet

Poetry Portal
Hi,

Hope you can wait one day for my assessment. I will surely do a detailed assessment tomorrow. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much: I appreciate your effort AdamBiswanger1 19:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Your question on AMA talk
Steve gave a pretty thorough answer, but you may be interested in reading Guide to Advocacy which is a work in progress and not an official policy. In fact I hope we never need an official policy. One of the strengths of the group is that it is voluntary and informal. One of the values of the group is that it can obviate the necessity for a formal dispute resolution process, which in my opinion can tend to waste community resources that can be spent on writing a better and truer encyclopedia. Feel free to look over the guide to advocacy, and if it seems appropriate, edit the guide. As for your question about objective truth, my answer would be that we cannot find objective truth unless we are willing to look for it, and one of the main goals for myself as an advocate is to make sure that everyone has a voice, so that the truth doesn't become a matter of majority opinion, and so that valid viewpoints don't get repressed without being explored. Thanks very much for your interest in the AMA, and for taking the time to comment.User:Pedant 02:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * True, true. In order to best understand the nature of AMA, I guess I should've gotten involved in it or studied the cases, neither of which I did.  I do thank you for your response, though.  But I suppose I should expect helpful explanations from an AMA member : ) AdamBiswanger1 05:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Evaluation of the Poetry Portal
Hi,

Much of the groundwork has been done per the review by Kirill above. I will be nit-picking a bit.

This looks enough for now. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Avoid fair use/copyrighted images to appear on the main page. Ex. Imagists.jpg. Also note that the image didn't had any caption. While it is okay if there aren't captions, keep it consistant for all summaries.
 * On Portal:Poetry/Selected article archive, I see that "Archive" is mentioned for articles only after August. I believe this was because the changes were made to it in August itself, but it wouldn't hurt to keep the whole history impeccable when only two minor changes are needed. Inconsistancy also present for Quotes, and other archives.
 * I find it odd that article for december is already selected while that for October and November are yet to be selected. There isn't anything wrong with it (if it is fixed before the last moment), but probably a slip I feel worth mentioning.
 * Try to keep the selected image always inside the frame for a good looking front page. I follow a 250px rule for images so that the overflow never occurs.
 * Quotes archive shows inconsistant usage of mdash before name of the person quoted.
 * DYKs should have a bullet (*) at the beginning. Also, the article that mentions the fact should be bolded.
 * The first mention of "Benjamin Jonson" is not bolded currently. It is inconsistant with the rest of selected content, like the "Poetry" (in lead), and "Cædmon" (Selected biography).
 * The title "Recent events" looks like a repeat since "News" is already mentioned. Remove it if only recent events are to be listed there.
 * Include the portal browse bar (browsebar) at the top.
 * Try to move the last part of the Intro; i.e. "WikiProject for Poetry | Things you can do | Categories of Poetry Articles...", etc. to a separate frame.
 * Always try to make sure that correct, and recommended licenses are used for images being showcased in the portal. For example, Pro eto by rodchenko.jpg has a disputed template, Yeats.jpg has an obsolete template, etc.
 * In my opinion, if a foreign language poem is selected, the original should be supplied first and translation later.
 * You may copy this to the Peer Review page if you want. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 15:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions-- Once things calm down around here, I'll be sure to implement them! AdamBiswanger1 04:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I'm back and I left a brief explanation on my talkpage. Of course you don't actually need the explanation because we've been in telepathic contact most of the time :) --Doc Tropics Message in a bottle 13:17, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wangi/RFA
Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/wangi 00:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Porter and Hill quotes
Hi. The Porter quote has long haunted me, and I was reminded of it while reading through the new Geoffrey Hill book Without Title. I think the pair of quotes work together well, and they both serve as useful landmarks through the landscape. Where possible I'm trying to use the quotes archive to put down quotes that are in some way important to me. Stumps 04:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

User: 71.198.250.36
I am suspicious of these additional links. The 'Ye Olde Library' doesn't seem to have anything other than Project Gutenberg works. But it doesn't seem to have any advertising either. What do you reckon? --MrArt 00:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

M.M.D. Article: Thanks!
Hi, Adam! Thank you so much for your tone tag on the Michael Madhusudan Dutt page! That page is on my list of what I call "Wiki Failures" (a.k.a. "Wiki Failures (Sigh)" :-D). However, it is now the only Wiki Failure that clearly includes a notice that (essentially) points toward the article's POV (which is, at least in part, what makes it informal in style).

(The other "Wiki Failures" are listed on my user page. Interestingly, they are all related to Indian celebrities who lived long before this century. What a shame that Indians can be so partial to their heroes that they carry these opinions to Wikipedia articles, which are supposed to be objective!) --Kuaichik 03:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Nice job
Good addition to Kant!--Anthony Krupp 03:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you--I have been thinking about that quote for a long time, and having just found it, I felt that I absolutely had to put it on wikipedia AdamBiswanger1 03:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

HEY ADAM, THIS IS MOUNTOLIVE...THE NAME MAY NOT EVEN BE FAMILIAR, BUT I GOT A WELCOME MESSAGE FROM YOU WHEN I REGISTERED, SO I GUESS YOU ARE MY 'TUTOR' OR WHATEVER THE NAME MAY BE FOR THAT. NOW I HAVE A LITTLE PROBLEM: I MADE SOME CHANGES ON THE ENTRY 'ETA' AND MANY OF THEM HAVE BEEN REMOVED. I FEEL LIKE THE 'REMOVER' IS NOT BEING NEUTRAL (THAT WAS THE AIM OF MY CHANGES). OF COURSE I MAY BE WRONG AND MYSELF BEING THE ONE BIASED, BUT IT IS JUST FRUSTRATING THAT I DON'T FIND A TALK PAGE FOR THIS ENTRY TO EXPOSE MY POINT OF VIEW TO THIS OTHER GUY AND WHOEVER MIGHT BE INTERESTED AND I AM NOT INTERESTED AT ALL TO KEEP STUBBORNINGLY POSTING MY CHANGES ONLY TO SEE THIS OTHER GUY REVERTING THEM OVER AND OVER, THIS SHOULDN'T BE THE WAY...I WOULD LIKE THAT SOMEONE WHO IS NOT THIS GUY NOR MYSELF DECIDES ON SOME OF THE ISSUES, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE IMPARTIAL, BECAUSE WE BOTH SEEM TO HAVE CLEAR (AND RATHER OPPOSITE) IDEAS ON THE ISSUE.

I JUST THOUGHT YOU COULD LET ME KNOW HOW TO DO THAT. IN OTHER WORDS: I JUST DON'T KNOW HOW TO COMMUNICATE TO OTHER WIKIPEDIANS...IF YOU CAN HELP, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT.

THANKS!

Mountolive again here...well, just FYI, I wanted you to know that I managed to leave a message on the User talk: Error (that's the user of the guy I'm discussing). I'm guessing this is the way wikipedians we communicate between each other, right?. Anyway, you are more than invited to look at it. I would be grateful if I hear back from you with any kind of comments or advice you may have in this regard. Thanks again.

Wanamaker Organ on Featured_article_candidates
Why not? The important information is there; it's well-written, and it's sourced. Why would you think it isn't ready? Worst case scenario- the nom either dies from lack of interest, or the nom raises awareness of the article and invites either other contributors; or helpful advice on the FAC discussion page. I think it's a good faith nomination.Spikebrennan 19:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Outside view requested
Greetings; if you have time and are inclined, please provide comments in the Outside Perspective section of this conduct-related RfC: Requests_for_comment/Kmaguir1. Thanks,--Anthony Krupp 17:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

 * Best of luck in your first year in college! Don't forget to keep studying, and don't let us distract you too much. <font color="DodgerBlue">alpha Chimp  laudare 19:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Poetry Portal Format
I think this seemingly minor change to the Biography article has fixed things. Let me know if you think it looks ok now. Stumps 00:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!
Hi there, Adam!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte! <font color="#008000"> hoopydink Conas tá tú? 23:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Belated thanks
Thank you for participating in my RfA. Consensus to promote was reached, and I am now an administrator. I'll be using the tools cautiously at first, and everyone should feel welcome to peer over my shoulder and make sure I'm not doing anything foolish. --RobthTalk 03:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Hey, thanks for all your help regardless. At least you took the time answer the PR, a rare feat nowadays. Thanks again!UberCryxic 01:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Your RFA
I have to admit that first oppose vote was the funniest thing i've seen at RFA in a longtime! Stubbleboy 00:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha yea--my first instinct was to take it seriously because it was my first oppose vote, but then I was like, hey good point. AdamBiswanger1 00:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Time's up, Big Wanker. Congratulations. Consider changing your username though. Adminship could be a dirty business. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Crz. I'll do as TenOfAllTrades suggested and "Let [my] mighty wang yield the extra inch of adminship" (whatever that means).  But anyway, thanks for the kind words.  Sorry to hear about your yanks, though.  Maybe we can give you 'ol Charlie and you can "unload" Torre on us.  (I guess 4 rings isn't enough)  AdamBiswanger1 03:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Well considering I get the dubious distinction of having the official congratulations, here it be. :) Use the new tools wisely, and use them conservatively, especially at first. Re-read policy before acting, but as you get the hang of things, jump in and help out with the backlogs. Have fun and again, congrats. - Taxman Talk 03:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Congratulations. --Guinnog 03:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sure that, subconsciously, your username was the main reason I supported you :D All the best with your new tools! &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc-damage report 10:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Congrats to you and the mighty one -- Samir धर्म 17:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Big Wanker. "my editing will no doubt slow down as I become acclimated and subsequently face the challenges of academic life". Beer pong???? Hmmmm...what do you have to say about that, mister?? Anyway, if you or your big wanker have any admin-related questions, feel free to contact me. Nish kid  64  20:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:203.10.72.213
I blocked the user before seeing your reply at AIV -- while looking through their contribs, I noticed what I'd consider a pretty strong pattern of editing. It's a soft block, one week long, given the IP's history. In retrospect, this may have been a bit trigger-happy on my part; if you'd like to reduce or negate the block, I have no objections. Luna Santin 00:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Blocking a vandal-only IP never hurt anyone ; ) We should be fine AdamBiswanger1 01:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Deleted Article
You recently deleted an article with the reason "Questionable IP votes attacking logical established-user votes".

Can you please explain to me why this is a valid reason for a page being deleted, saying it seems to me you just looked at IP votes and said "Nah.. delete", even though that is not relevant to the article. f3llah1n <sup style="color:#FF9900;">(talk)  16:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not the case. 6 of the 7 "keep" votes came from single purpose accounts whose only contributions related to that AfD.  1 of them has a total 6-9 edits with the only 3 AfD votes being in that article.  With that said, there were 4 delete votes from established users.  Hope this clears things up, AdamBiswanger1 20:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but its not a vote, its a discussion, and it met the criteria in WP:WEB =/
 * Yes but being that I am closing the AfD, my own opinion is irrelevant and I only follow the established consensus. I ignored the single purpose accounts, or at least counted them as a single voice, and a consensus for delete remained. AdamBiswanger1 20:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Your discussion addition
Answered on my page. Have a great evening! Rsm99833 04:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Favor++
Any chance of leaving an edit summary like "list clear" or "mt" or "not mt" when you deal with AIV? Your summaries are really confusing me :). Btw, congrats...I know you'll do great. Thanks, Alphachimp 04:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem--I was using a "done" for each individual case dealt with. AdamBiswanger1 04:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Alphachimp 04:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

A word on IPs
First off, I'd like to preface this message by congratulating you on your (extremely) recent RfA: you appear to have done fairly well since you received the mop, and I expect you'll do a fine job with it. Although, I don't know how I could possibly trust anyone with the word "wang" in their name - how immature! :)

Anyway, I noticed that you recently blocked the vandal IP 147.31.184.88 for three hours, and thought I could suggest an improvement for the future. I don't know if you've ever read Mindspillage's very excellent essay, but I believe its major point has some relevance here. Although the IP had been vandalising steadily for a while, and had received warnings in the past, you may have missed this message they left on their userpage shortly before they were blocked; Riana dzasta followed up on that by placing a tag on their talk page just one minute before you banned. Again, I'm guessing you missed that - not unreasonably - since they two happened so closely together that the change may not have been obvious to you at the time.

My suggestion is simply that you slow down a little, and ensure that the IP hasn't already stopped vandalising before issuing a block, even if it's only a short one. In this particular instance, since the IP hadn't vandalised any pages for forty-five minutes or so before the block, it would probably have been preferable to simply wait an hour or two to check that they hadn't continued to mess things up. Blocks aren't a punishment, they're a preventative measure: the IP appeared to have stopped vandalising, so it may have been the case that no prevention was truly necessary.

Your actions were reasonable and fair, and I'm certainly not saying that you made a mistake. I just thought I'd take a moment to promote a slightly more lenient kind of blocking policy. :)

Again, congratulations on your successful RfA, and I hope to see a lot of you around in the future (as soon as I get back into RCP...). Good luck with the mop! Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 13:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My apologies-- I did miss that message on the userpage. I sort of remember that as I was issuing the block notice, I believe I had an edit conflict with the editor who added the  notice.  I thought it was a nice thing to do, having such an outreaching attitude toward a vandal, but I also saw 8 or so warnings so I thought I'd administer a short block.  But in any event, I can't justify my actions completely and I'm sure I was a little trigger-happy, trying to clear the backlog at WP:AIV.  But I certainly don't want you to think that I am carelessly exercising my new powers and not investigating anything-- One of the things you learn on Wikipedia is that you have to check everything.  So, thanks for your note and your congratulations, and I'll be sure to be a bit more careful next time. AdamBiswanger1 14:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I probably would've done the same, in your situation, and I only reported him because I saw the previous warnings. I'll be a little more careful with reporting to AIV next time, too.
 * Yay, we all learned a lesson. This is so Sesame Street. ;) &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc-damage report 14:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, I think you might have taken my suggestion as being more severe than it was really intended. You didn't do anything wrong, and you weren't really trigger-happy - it's just that I think things could be improved for the future. Nobody's about to judge you on your third day of adminship anyway. :) Keep up the good work! Daveydw ee b ( chat/patch ) 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense taken-- I think what we all need here is a group hug AdamBiswanger1 14:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * You're the best, editor who added the message! AdamBiswanger1 17:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Recognition at last! :p Alright, I'll stop bothering you and your big wang now. Enjoy :) &mdash; riana_dzasta wreak havoc-damage report 18:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

+sysop
Sorry I didn't support you on your RfA...congrats on becoming an admin. :-) 1ne 05:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your help
Thank you for your assistance in the Single-grain experiment article. I was a DYK on October 12. I really appreciated it. Chris 01:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Big-Wang in Big Trouble!
No, just kidding...

OR AM I?

Anyway, I saw you removed the Currie Cup info from ITN, and I'm perfectly fine with that. In fact, I was one of the people who actually asked why it was put on in the first place because it didn't seem of international importance. Apparently, this competition is followed by many other countries, so I guess it notable. See Template_talk:In_the_news for details. Hope you're having fun at 'Cuse. Nish kid 64  02:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ooops... still a bit questionable (I would expect fans to overstate its significance), but that just goes to show you have to check EVERYTHING before you make the slightest change. Thanks for letting me know, AdamBiswanger1 02:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)