User:Adamkritz/The Age of A.I./Jvalle58 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Adamkritz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Adamkritz/The Age of A.I.
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * The Age of A.I.

Evaluate the drafted changes
Upon reading your sandbox draft, I like how you included a box of summaries for each of the show's episodes, which can give viewers an idea on what to expect prior to watching it. I've noticed you've also started a "Themes and analysis" section, which is a great idea and definitely something you should elaborate about in depth, especially if they relate to topics that we have discussed in class earlier. That section might be the next one that readers will focus their attention on after going through the individual episode summaries. For the summaries themselves, to avoid repetition I would recommend rewording the points where you talk about the episode transitioning to another AI issue (especially where you write about its next or final part). In the lead, I think a brief mention about the topics discussed in the series or the themes it touches on would be good to include as a summarizing point. You can still leave the elaboration on the topics and themes themselves under "Themes and analysis".

Under the "Interviews" section, I would recommend adding sources that touch on any of the persons talking about the series outside of the production set. More specifically, have any of them had interviews that were not included in the episodes? Have any of them offered opinions as to how the series was run, or what they consider the most important AI issues today? On that note I think it would be helpful to sort the persons either in alphabetical order or whenever they first appeared on the show (say if Pedro Domingos was the first person to be interviewed in the first episode). You can also refer back to the episode they were included in, along with if they made multiple appearances across the series.

For "Reception", I would reword the first sentence talking about the author recommending viewers to stream the show. Outside of that, does Rotten Tomatoes, Fandango, or IMDb have any ratings data or critical reviews pertaining to the series? I think incorporating any of these sites alongside the Common Sense Media review would be great to add as references. If the show has won awards or earned nominations, you can also add these within the same section. I like how you touched on the show's target audience under that section as well. ~Jvalle58