User:Adamng926/Digital citizen/Melissawwang Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Adamng926
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Adamng926/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Lead evaluation
The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added by the peer. Also, I like how there were introductory parts to each of the sections that were going to be mentioned to clearly delineate your information for the reader to understand. I think the information is concise and effective in its wording and also does a good job including information that is not currently present in the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes

Content evaluation
Overall, I found that the content you included was relevant to the topic. I would suggest to add even more examples of digital citizenship in contemporary times, since the original article mainly focuses upon the surveys conducted for the engagement of youth and the overlapping goals of digital citizenship education. Otherwise, I really think you did a conclusive and good job including relevant information.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone you added into the article was with a neutral point of view and was informational. I think the strongest part of this content was the addition of new factual data, which is not necessarily something that would be "persuasive". By adding data, it is up to the reader's own interpretation to see whether or not digital citizenship is something more beneficial or more harmful than originally intended for society. I liked how you included Estonia's e-residency as a additional topic for discussion as well.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Sources and references evaluation
The sources I checked were all working and there were many contemporary articles that were included as well which would certainly help update the digital citizen Wikipedia page. I appreciate how you added research reports and books that demonstrate the positive and negative sides of digital citizenship, impacting the way that it has upon contemporary society.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? no

Organization evaluation
I enjoy how you were able to keep the information very concise yet effectively worded. I think the fact that you wanted to include more factual statistics in order to strengthen the original article is very conclusive and open-ended for the readers to get their own perspectives without having to be persuaded by the Wikipedia article. Good job on following the guidelines and keeping the neutral point of view.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

Images and media evaluation
Although there are not any images, I think adding a graphic or image to further explain the digital citizen ideas to its best capacity. Not only that, I think it would be great to include more eye-catching graphics that would be more engaging for the audience.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? yes
 * How can the content added be improved? yes

Overall evaluation
Overall, I really enjoy the digestible organization you created for this topic. Since the original website already has so many sources, I appreciate how you wanted to create a new section on the education as well as giving a different perspective of the risks of digital citizenship. This definitely gives this article more well-roundedness while we are trying to learn about this new topic in this contemporary political environment. Not only that, I appreciate how you wanted to cite a various range of different perspectives such as the pros and cons of civic engagement speeches. This makes it much more convincing and informational.