User:Adamsd2016/United States Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command/SlayerWill Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Im really not sure, I think its Dan's but it might just be the actual article.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: United States Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * I don't think so
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes but I don't think its something that we edited
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? I don't think so
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? the lead paragraph is good but I don't think that what im seeing is an edited article, I think its the actual article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The entire article seems concise I don't see anything wrong with it
 * Is the content added up-to-date? It was last updated September 29th so id say yeah its pretty up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No it seems like everything that needs to be here is here

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? It seems like the paper has good flow
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not really, it seems like the article is concise and well written
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No it seems like theirs an adequate amount of information in the article
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Not really I mean its an article on a military group

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes everything has sources and links to support the actual assignment.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yeah all the links I click on take you to supporting articles
 * Are the sources current? yeah they've all been updated pretty recently
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yeah all the ones I checked are working

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yeah its simple to read, no huge words or crazy statements.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Im horrible at grammar but it seems like its all right
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? their are lots of sections that are organized really easily.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: theirs pictures that are in the article that seem like their really consise


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? The pictures depict like actual events that happened along with the logo so I feel like their pretty relivant.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes their all labeled
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yeah
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yeah they all look great where their placed in the article

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Sure, I think, the article is really complete
 * What are the strengths of the content added? It makes the article a lot stronger
 * How can the content added be improved? It would help if I new if the article was reviewed or edited first so then I could be like yeah this part really helped but overall I fell like it is really good.