User:Adamsshort/Digital rhetoric/MWairimu Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Adamsshort


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Adamsshort/Digital rhetoric


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Digital rhetoric - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall Impressions

The content added is well researched, and the sources are acknowledged. It seems like it will improve the overall quality of the main article. The content can be improved by making it more succinct. It feels like it's a lot. Also, it mentions the various authors too much within the text so maybe you could use the "cite" function to work around this. I don't know too much about the topic at this point to know how well this piece fits into the larger topic.