User:AddWittyNameHere/Lepidoptera to-do list/Genera

Lots and lots of Lepidoptera genera that could use some attention.

Genera lacking own article

 * Ariola (moth) (tribe Ariolicini, also non-existent. Articles exist for Ariola coelisigna, Ariola ransonneti. Convert Ariola from redir into proper disambiguation page after.)
 * Austrocarea. (Article Austrocarea iocephala exists.)

Genera with significant portion of species lacking articles

 * Dichromia – 30/33 species listed are redlinks (!)

Underdeveloped articles

 * Practically everything. Only listing cases that are exceptionally underdeveloped. (That is, genus-and-species clusters with over 50% of articles involved being unsourced/hiiiighly undersourced 'infobox+one-line text' stubs & similar.)

Other genera issues

 * Properly categorizing monotypic Lepidoptera genera as such. If/when monotypic Lep. genera are properly categorized, see which if any are worth further categorizing (would require cats to be made for most part, thus only if a significant number of such articles exist)
 * Taxonomy. Especially genera synonyms. Many miss redirects. Many existing redirects miss templates. (When it comes to taxonomy and categorization, try and work with the currently existing category-structure. It's a bloody mess*, but with the sheer number of species and genera currently not even properly contained in it, it's not going to be easy to straighten out just yet. Let's tackle that after the stuff is at least halfway properly there)

Bloody mess examples: as in, for some inexplicable reason, Category: Moth taxonomy is in Category: Lepidoptera taxonomy and in Category: Moths, both of which in return are direct subcats of Category: Lepidoptera. Butterfly is in both Category:Lepidoptera and its direct subcat Category:Butterflies.

Direct parent-category 1: Category:Lepidoptera described in 1904 Direct parent-category 2: Category:Moths described in the 20th century Good grief...
 * A real example of a headache, though, would be Category:Moths described in 1904.
 * Category:Lepidoptera described in 1904 within Category:Lepidoptera taxonomy within Category:Lepidoptera (+two levels up for Category:Insects, of which Category:Insect taxonomy is a subcat)
 * Category:Lepidoptera described in 1904 within Category:Lepidoptera taxonomy within Category: Insect taxonomy within Category:Insects
 * Category:Lepidoptera described in 1904 within Category: Insects described in 1904 within Category:Insects described in the 20th century in Category:Insects by year of formal description also in Category:Insect taxonomy
 * Category:Moths described in the 20th century in Category:Insects described in the 20th century in Category:Insects by year of formal description also in Category:Insect taxonomy
 * Category:Moths described in the 20th century in Category:Moths by year of formal description in, yup. Category: Insects by year of formal description that's still in Category:Insect taxonomy.
 * Category:Moths described in the 20th century in Category:Moths by year of formal description in Category:Moths in Category: Lepidoptera.